Cycles of Repression and Tactical Innovation: The Evolution of Environmental Dissidence in Communist Czechoslovakia

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, Catherine. 1998. “Environmental Policy in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Pp. 267–93 in Ecological Policy and Politics in Developing Countries: Economic Growth, Democracy, and Environment, edited by U. Desai. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, Paul D. 2003. “Opportunity Organizations and Threat-Induced Contention: Protest Waves in Authoritarian Settings.” American Journal of Sociology 109(2):345–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, Paul D. 2008. Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925–2005. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, Petr. 2008. “Akce ‘Přednáška’, Sledování Ivana Dejmala” (Action “Lecture,” Surveillance of Ivan Dejmal). Pamet a dejiny 2:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, Margaret and David Hunter. 1992. “Environmental Reforms in Post-Communist Central Europe: From High Hopes to Hard Reality.” Michigan Journal of International Law 13:921–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bren, Paulina. 2004. “1969 East and West: Visions of Political Change and Student Protest from across the Iron Curtain.” Pp. 119–35 in Transnational Moments of Change: Europe 1945, 1968, 1989, edited by G. Horn and P. Kenney. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. Christopher. 2004. “Faction in Movement: The Impact of Inclusivity on the Anti-Globalization Movement.” Social Science Quarterly 85(3):559–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bursík, Tomáš. 2009. “A Cheap and Dispensable Tool for Uranium Extraction.” Pp. 34–7 in Behind the Iron Curtain: Review of the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, Czech Republic, edited by C. Johnston and A. Gibson. Prague, Czech Republic: Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes.
   Google Scholar
• Carmin, JoAnn and Barbara Hicks. 2002. “International Triggering Events, Transnational Networks, and the Development of the Czech and Polish Environmental Movements.” Mobilization 7(3):305–24.
   Google Scholar
• Carmin, JoAnn and Petr Jehlička. 2005. “By the Masses or for the Masses? The Transformation of Voluntary Action in the Czech Union for Nature Protection.” Voluntas 16:397–416.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Francis W. 1993. “Czechoslovakia.” Pp. 63–88 in Environmental Problems in Eastern Europe, edited by F. W. Carter and D. Turnock. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Day, Barbara. 1999. The Velvet Philosophers. London, UK: Claridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer-Ashworth, Elizabeth. 2000. The Global Political Economy and Post-1989 Change: The Place of the Central European Transition. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dejmalová, Kateřina and Háta Dejmalová. 2008. Ivan Dejmal, Prostor k Úvaze (Ivan Dejmal, Space for Thought). Lomnice nad Popelkou, Czech Republic: Jaroslav Bárta Studio JB.
   Google Scholar
• Dingsdale, Alan and Denes Locszy. 2001. “The Environmental Challenge of Societal Transition in East Central Europe.” Pp. 187–99 in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Environment and Society, edited by D. Turnock. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, Jennifer. 2003. “Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression.” Sociological Theory 21(1):44–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, Jennifer. 2004. “Controlling Protest: New Directions for Research on the Social Control of Protest.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 25:55–83.
   Google Scholar
• Einwohner, Rachel L. 2003. “Opportunity, Honor, and Action in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943.” American Journal of Sociology 109:650–75.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67(1):11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagin, Adam. 1999. “The Development of Civil Society in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Sector as a Measure of Associational Activity.” Journal of European Area Studies 7(1):91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fagin, Adam. 2004. Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, Myra Marx. 2005. “Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Silencing in Gender-Based Movements.” Pp. 138–55 in Repression and Mobilization, edited by C. Davenport, H. Johnston, and C. Mueller. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Duncan. 1992. Paradise Deferred: Environmental Policymaking in Central and Eastern Europe. London, UK: The Royal Institute of International Affairs and Ecological Studies Institute/The Chameleon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, Jack and Charles Tilly. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamic of Contention Politics.” Pp. 179–94 in Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by R. Aminzade, J. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. Perry, W. Sewell, S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Jeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Havlíček, Peter. 1997. “The Czech Republic: First Steps toward a Cleaner Future.” Environment 39(3):16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, S. W. 1975. “The Case of Ivan Dejmal.” Critique 4(1):116.
   Google Scholar
• Holy, Ladislav. 1996. The Little Czech and the Great Czech Nation: National Identity and the Post-Communist Transformation of Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horák, Martin. 2001. “Environmental Policy Reform in the Post-Communist Czech Republic: The Case of Air Pollution.” Europe—Asia Studies 53(2):313–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hron, Jan, ed. 2009. Věčné Casy: Ceskoslovenské totalitní roky (Eternal Times: Czechoslovakian Totalitarian Years). Prague, Czech Republic: Respeckt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jancar-Webster, Barbara. 1987. Environmental Management in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia: Structure and Regulation in Federal Communist States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jancar-Webster, Barbara. 1998. “Environmental Movement and Social Change in the Transition Countries.” Pp. 69–90 in Dilemmas of Transition: The Environment, Democracy and Economic Reform in East Central Europe, edited by S. Baker and P. Jehlička. London, UK: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Jehlička, Petr. 2001. “The New Subversives—Czech Environmentalists after 1989.” Pp. 81–94 in Pink, Purple, and Green: Women's, Religious, Environmental and Gay/Lesbian Movements in Central Europe Today, edited by H. Flam. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. Craig. 1998. “Channeling Social Protest: Foundation Patronage of Contemporary Social Movements.” Pp. 206–16 in Private Action and the Public Good, edited by W. W. Powell and E. C. Clemens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karabel, Jerome. 1995. “The Revolt of the Intellectuals: The Prague Spring and the Politics of Reform Communism.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 18:93–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, Padraic. 2002. A Carnival of Revolution: Central Europe 1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud. 2004. “Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention.” Pp. 19–46 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, Charles. 1996. “Structural Opportunity and Perceived Opportunity in Social Movement Theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979.” American Sociological Review 61(1):153–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1997. The Czech and Slovak Republics: Nation versus State. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan José. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. 1983. “Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency.” American Sociological Review 48:735–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” Pp. 23–40 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly J. 2003. “‘Out of the Parlors and into the Streets’: The Changing Tactical Repertoire of the U.S. Women's Suffrage Movements.” Social Forces 81:787–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John D., David W. Britt, and Mark Wolfson. 1991. “The Channeling of Social Movements in the Modern American State.” Social Movements, Conflict, and Change 13:45–76.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:125–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, David S. and Debra C. Minkoff. 2004. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82(4):1457–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldan, Bedrich and Tomas Hak, eds. 2000. Czech Republic 2000 Ten Years On: Environment and Quality of Life after Ten Years of Transition. Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberschall, Anthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Osa, Maryjane. 2001. “Mobilizing Structures and Cycles of Protest: Post-Stalinist Contention in Poland, 1954–1959.” Mobilization 6(2):211–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, Petr. 1997. Economic Restructuring and Local Environmental Management in the Czech Republic. Lewistown, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, Petr and John Pickles. 2000. Environmental Transitions: Transformation and Ecological Defense in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prečan, Vilém, ed. 1990. Charta 77, 1977–1989: Od Morální k Demokratické Revoluci, Dokumentace (Charter 77, 1977–1989: From Moral to Democratic Revolution). Bratislava, Slovakia: Archa Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Prečan, Vilém. 1993. “Independent Literature and Samizdat in Czechoslovakia in the 1970s and the 1980s.” Pp. 91–107 in Literature and Politics in Central Europe: Studies in Honour of Marketa Goetz-Stankiewicz, edited by L. Miller, K. Peterson, and P. Stenberg. Columbia, SC: Camden House.
   Google Scholar
• Roscigno, Vincent J. and William F. Danaher. 2001. “Media and Mobilization: The Case of Radio and Southern Textile Worker Insurgency, 1929–1934.” American Sociological Review 66(1):21–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, Kurt. 1999. “People Power and Political Opportunities: Social Movement Mobilization and Outcomes in the Philippines and Burma.” Social Problems 46(3):355–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilling, H. Gordon. 1981. Charter 77 and Human Rights in Czechoslovakia. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Skilling, H. Gordon and Paul Wilson, eds. 1991. Civic Freedom in Central Europe: Voices from Czechoslovakia. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stockdill, Brett C. 1996. “Multiple Oppressions and Their Influence on Collective Action: The Case of the AIDS Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “State and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” Pp. 41–61 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tichý, Martin and Olga Bezděkova. 2009. “Communist Regime Investigation Aids Help Historians Uncover Secrets.” Pp. 30–2 in Behind the Iron Curtain: Review of the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, Czech Republic, edited by C. Johnston and A. Gibson. Prague, Czech Republic: Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes.
   Google Scholar
• Tickle, Andrew. 2000. “Regulating Environmental Space in Socialist and Post-Socialist Systems: Nature and Landscape Conservation in the Czech Republic.” Journal of European Area Studies 8(1):57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tickle, Andrew and Josef Vavroušek. 1998. “Environmental Politics in the Former Czechoslovakia.” Pp. 114–45 in Environment and Society in Eastern Europe, edited by A. Tickle and I. Welsh. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Turnock, David, ed. 2001. East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Environment and Society. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Vaněk, Miroslav. 1996. Nedalo se tady dýchat (It Was Impossible to Breathe Here). Maxdorf, Germany: Ústav Pro Soudobé Dějiny, AV CR, Prague, CR.
   Google Scholar
• Vaněk, Miroslav. 2004. “The Development of a Green Opposition in Czechoslovakia: The Role of International Contacts.” Pp. 173–88 in Transnational Moments of Change: Europe 1945, 1968, 1989, edited by G. Horn and P. Kenney. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wathern, Peter. 1998. Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar