Lagging Effects of the Use of Activity‐Based Costing on the Financial Performance of Small Firms*

References

• Al‐omiri, M., and C. Drury (2007). “Survey of Factors Influencing the Choice of Product Costing Systems in UK Organizations,” Management Accounting Research 18, 399–424.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. W., and M. S. Young (1999). “The Impact of Contextual and Process Factors on the Evaluation of Activity‐Based Costing Systems,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 24, 525–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N., and V. Govindarajan (2001). Management Control Systems, 10th ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, K. M., G. L. Harrison, and R. C. Reeve (2004). “Adoption of Activity Management Practices: A Note on the Extent of Adoption and the Influence of Organizational and Cultural Factors,” Management Accounting Research 15, 383–399.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., I. R. Bardhan, and T.‐Y. Chen (2008). “The Role of Manufacturing Practices in Mediating the Impact of Activity‐Based Costing on Plant Performance,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 33, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny (1986). “The Moderator‐Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxendale, S. (2001). “Activity‐Based Costing for the Small Business. A Primer,” Business Horizons 41, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M. (1998). “Strategic Planning in Small High Tech Companies,” Long Range Planning 31, 455–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhimani, A., M. Gosselin, M. Ncube, and H. Okano (2007). “Activity‐Based Costing: How Far Have We Come Internationally?,” Cost Management 21(3), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bjornenak, T., and F. Mitchell (2002). “The Development of Activity‐Based Costing Journal Literature, 1987–2000,” European Accounting Review 11, 481–508.
   Google Scholar
• Cagwin, D., and M. J. Bouwman (2002). “The Association between Activity‐Based Costing and Improvement in Financial Performance,” Management Accounting Research 13, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2003). “Management Control Systems Design within Its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency‐Based Research and Directions for the Future,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 127–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2004). “The Role of Conflict in Early Implementation of Activity Cost Management,” Behavioral Research in Accounting 16, 19–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H., and K. Langfield‐smith (1998). “Adoption and Benefits of Management Accounting Practices: An Australian Study,” Management Accounting Research 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (1988). “The Rise of Activity‐Based Costing—Part Two: When Do I Need an Activity‐Based Cost System?,” Journal of Cost Management 2, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Davila, A., and G. Foster (2005). “Management Accounting Systems Adoption Decisions: Evidence and Performance Implications from Early‐Stage/Startup Companies,” Accounting Review 80, 1039–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A., G. Foster, and M. Li (2009). “Reasons for Management Control Systems Adoption: Insights from Product Development Systems Choice by Early‐Stage Entrepreneurial Companies,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(3–4), 322–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, T. (2005). “An Exploratory Study on the Emergence of Management Control Systems: Formalizing Human Resources in Small Growing Firms,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 223–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmar, F., P. Davidsson, and W. Gartner (2003). “Arriving at the High‐Growth Firm,” Journal of Business Venturing 18, 189–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G., and D. W. Swenson (1997). “Measuring the Success of Activity‐Based Cost Management and Its Determinants,” Journal of Management Accounting Research 9, 109–141.
   Google Scholar
• Gosselin, M. (2007). “A Review of Activity‐Based Costing: Technique, Implementation, and Consequences,” in Handbook of Management Accounting Research, 2. Eds. C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood and M. D. Shields. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd., 641–671.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbus, A., and R. N. Lussier (2006). “Entrepreneurs Use a Balanced Scorecard to Translate Strategy into Performance Measures,” Journal of Small Business Management 44(3), 407–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran, A., and D. Singh (1999). “Design of Activity‐Based Costing in a Small Company: A Case Study,” Computers and Industrial Engineering 37, 413–416.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran, A., H. B. Marri, and R. J. Grieve (1999). “Activity‐Based Costing in Small and Medium Enterprises,” Computers and Industrial Engineering 37, 407–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. Jr, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice‐Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. T. (1999). “Yes, ABC Is for Small Business, Too,” Journal of Accountancy 188, 41–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., W. N. Lanen, and D. F. Larcker (2002). “The Association between Activity‐Based Costing and Manufacturing Performance,” Journal of Accounting Research 40, 711–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallunki, J., and H. Silvola (2008). “The Effect of Organizational Life Cycle Stage on the Use of Activity‐Based Costing,” Management Accounting Research 19, 62–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. (1994). “Management Accounting (1984–1994): Development of New Practices and Trends of Development,” Management Accounting Research 5, 247–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and R. Cooper (1998). Cost and Effect, Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton (2001). The Strategy‐Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T., and J. Affleck‐graves (2001). “The Impact of Activity‐Based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance,” Journal of Management Accounting Research 13, 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, E. K. (2001a). “Management Accounting Change in Small Technology Companies: Towards a Mathematical Model of Technology Firm,” Management Accounting Research 12, 507–541.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, E. K. (2001b). Suomalaisten teknologiayritysten talouden ohjausjärjestelmät. Levon Institute. Publication 95. University of Vaasa. (In English: Management Accounting Systems of Finnish Technology Firm).
   Google Scholar
• Lascola needy, K., H. Nachtmann, N. Roztocki, R. C. Warner, and B. Bidanda (2003). “Implementing Activity‐Based Costing Systems in Small Manufacturing Firms: A Field Study,” Engineering Management Journal 15, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J., and M. D. Shields (2003). “Mapping Management Accounting: Graphics and Guidelines for Theory‐Consistent Empirical Research,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 169–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiga, A. S., and F. A. Jacobs (2007). “Activity‐Based Cost Management and Manufacturing, Operational and Financial Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” in Advances in Management Accounting, 16. Eds. J. Y. Lee and M. J. Epstein. Oxford: Emerald Group Publishing, 217–260.
   Google Scholar
• Maiga, A. S., and F. A. Jacobs (2008). “Extent of ABC Use and Its Consequences,” Contemporary Accounting Research 25, 533–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgowan, A. S., and T. P. Klammer (1997). “Satisfaction with Activity‐Based Cost Management Implementation,” Journal of Management Accounting Research 9, 217–237.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmahon, R. G. P. (2001). “Business Growth and Performance and the Financial Reporting Practices of Australian Manufacturing SMEs,” Journal of Small Business Management 39(2), 152–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, F., and G. C. Reid (2000). “Editorial: Problems, Challenges and Opportunities: the Small Business as a Setting for Management Accounting Research,” Management Accounting Research 11, 385–390.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, K., and S. Yuen (2001). “Management Accounting Systems and Organizational Configuration: A Life‐Cycle Perspective,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 26, 351–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, A. I., and S. Bhattacharya (2006). “Organizational Performance Effects of ERP Systems Usage: The Impact of Post‐Implementation Changes,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 7, 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Orser, B. J., S. Hogarth‐scott, and A. Riding (2000). “Performance, Firm Size and Management Problem Solving,” Journal of Small Business Management 38, 42–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. (1999). “Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research,” Management Accounting Research 10, 363–382.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, M. J., and J. Bridge (1998). “How Planning and Capital Budgeting Improve SME Performance,” Long Range Planning 31, 848–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perren, L., and P. Grant (2000). “The Evolution of Management Accounting Routines in Small Businesses: A Social Construction Perspective,” Management Accounting Research 11, 391–411.
   Google Scholar
• Perren, L., A. Berry, and M. Partridge (1998). “The Evolution of Management Information, Control and Decision‐Making Processes in Small Growth‐Oriented Service Sector Businesses: Exploratory Lessons from Four Cases of Success,” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 5, 351–361.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. C. (2001). “The Relationship between Written Business Plans and the Failure of Small Business in the U.S.,” Journal of Small Business Management 39, 201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemenschneider, C. K., and P. P. Mykytyn Jr (2000). “What Small Business Executives Have Learned about Managing Information Technology,” Information and Management 37, 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roztocki, N., J. D. Porter, R. M. Thomas, and K. Lascola needy (2004). “A Procedure for Smooth Implementation of Activity‐Based Costing in Small Companies,” Engineering Management Journal 16, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rue, L. W., and N. A. Ibrahim (1998). “The Relationship between Planning Sophistication and Performance in Small Businesses,” Journal of Small Business Management 36, 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandino, T. (2007). “Introducing the First Management Control Systems: Evidence from the Retail Sector,” Accounting Review 82, 265–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shank, J. K., and V. Govindarajan (1993). Strategic Cost Management. The New Tool for Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shank, J. K., and V. Govindarajan (1995). Strategic Cost Analysis: The Evolution from Managerial to Strategic Accounting. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. D. (1995). “An Empirical Analysis of Firms' Implementation Experiences with Activity‐Based Costing,” Journal of Management Accounting Research 7, 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. D. (1997). “Research in Management Accounting by North Americans in the 1990s,” Journal of Management Accounting Research 9, 3–61.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (2000). Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B. (2001). “Structural Equation Modelling,” Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed. Eds. B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Needham Heights, MA: Pearson Educ. Int., 653–771.
   Google Scholar
• Van der stede, W. A., S. M. Young, and C. X. Chen (2005). “Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Empirical Management Accounting Research: The Case of Survey Studies,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 655–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. A., and T. L. Pett (2006). “Small‐Firm Performance: Modeling the Role of Product and Process Improvements,” Journal of Small Business Management 44(2), 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar