286
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Local ensemble Kalman filtering in the presence of model bias

, , , &
Pages 293-306 | Received 06 Apr 2005, Accepted 05 Dec 2005, Published online: 15 Dec 2016

References

  • Anderson, J. L. 2001. An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 129, 2884–2903.
  • Annan, J. D. and Hargreaves, J. C. 2004. Efficient parameter estimation for a highly chaotic system. Tellus 56A, 520–526.
  • Baer, E and Tribbia, J. J. 1977. On complete filtering of gravity modes through nonlinear initialization. Mon. Wea. Rev. 105, 1536–1539.
  • Bell, M. J., Martin, M. J. and Nichols, N. K. 2004. Assimilation of data into an ocean model with systematic errors near the equator. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 130, 873–893.
  • Bishop, C. H., Etherton, B. J. and Majumdar, S. J. 2001. Adaptive sam-pling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev. 129, 420–436.
  • Carton, J. A., Chepurin, G. and Cao, X. 2000. A simple ocean data assimilation analysis of the global upper ocean 1950-1995. Part I: Methodology. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 30, 294–309.
  • Cohn, S. E. 1997. An introduction to estimation theory. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan 75, 257–288.
  • Daley, R. 1992. The effect of serially correlated observation and model error on atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 120, 164–177.
  • Dee, D. P. and Da Silva, A. M. 1998. Data assimilation in the presence of forecast bias. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 124, 269–295.
  • Dee, D. P. and Todling, R. 2000. Data assimilation in the presence of fore-cast bias: The GEOS moisture analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev. 128, 3268–3282.
  • Derber, J. C. 1989. A variational continuous assimilation technique. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 2437–2446.
  • Etherton, B. J. and Bishop, C. H. 2004. Resilience of hybrid ensem-ble/3DVAR analysis schemes to model error and ensemble covariance error. Mon. Wea. Rev. 132, 1065–1080.
  • Evensen, G. 1994. Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res. 99C5, 10 143–10 162.
  • Friedland, B. 1969. Treatment of bias in recursive filtering. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 14, 359–367.
  • Ghil, M., Cohn, S., Tavantzis J., Bube, K. and Isaacson, E. 1981. Ap-plications of estimation theory to numerical weather prediction. In: Dynamic Meteorology: Data Assimilation Methods (eds. A. L. Bengts-son, M. Ghil, and E. Kallen) Springer-Verlag, New York, 139–224.
  • Hamill, T. M. and Snyder, C. 2000. A hybrid ensemble kalman filter-3D variational analysis scheme. Men. Wea. Rev. 128, 2905–2919.
  • Hamill, T. M., Whitaker, J. S. and Snyder, C. 2001. Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev. 129, 2776–2790.
  • Hamill, T. M. and Whitaker, J. S. 2005. Accounting for the error due to unresolved scales in ensemble data assimilation: A comparison of different approaches. Mon. Wea. Rev. 133, 3132–3147.
  • Hansen, J. A. 2002. Accounting for model error in ensemble-based state estimation and forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev. 130, 2373–2391.
  • Houtekamer, P. L. and Mitchell, H. L. 1998. Data assimilation using an ensemble kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Rev. 126, 796–811.
  • Houtekamer, P. L. and Mitchell, H. L. 2001. A sequential ensemble kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 129, 123–137.
  • Houtekamer, P. L., Mitchell, H. L., Pellerin, G., Buehner, M. and Charron, M., 2005. Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensem-ble kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 133, 604–620.
  • Jazwinski, A. H. 1970. Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Aca-demic Press, San Diego.
  • Lorenz, E. N. and Emanuel, K. A. 1998. Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: Simulation with a small model. J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 399–414.
  • Lynch, P. and Huang, X.-Y. 1992. Initialization of the HIRLAM model using a digital filter. Mon. Wea. Rev. 120, 1019–1034.
  • Lynch, P. 1997. The Dolph-Chebyshev window: A simple optimal filter. Mon. Wea. Rev. 125, 655–660.
  • Machenhauer, B. 1977. On the dynamics of gravity oscillations in a shallow water model with applications to normal mode initialization. Contrib. Atmos. Phys. 50, 253–271.
  • Margolin, L. G., Titi, E. S. and Wynne, S. 2003. The postprocess-ing Galerkin and nonlinear Galerkin methods-A truncation analysis point of view. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41,695–714.
  • Martin, M. J., Bell, M. J. and Nichols, N. K. 2002. Estimation of system-atic error in an equatorial ocean model using data assimilation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 40, 435–444.
  • Ott, E., Hunt, B. R., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A. V. and Kostelich, E. J. 2004a. A local ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Tellus 56A, 415–428.
  • Ott, E., Hunt, B. R., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A. V. and Kostelich, E. J. 2004b. Estimating the state of large spatio-temporally chaotic systems. Phys. Lett. A 330, 365–370.
  • Szunyogh, I., Kostelich, E. J., Gyarmati, G., Patil, D. J. and Hunt, B. R. 2005. Assessing a local ensemble Kalman filter: Perfect model experiments with the NCEP global model. Tellus 57A, 528–545.
  • Whitaker, J. S. and Hamill, T. M. 2002. Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 130, 1913–1924.
  • Whitaker, J. S., Compo, G. P., Wei, X. and Hamil T. M. 2004. Reanalysis without radiosondes using ensemble data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 132, 1190–1200.
  • Zupanski, D. 1997. A general weak constraint applicable to operational 4DVAR data assimilation systems. Mon. Wea. Rev. 125, 2274–2292.