Comparison of error breeding, singular vectors, random perturbations and ensemble Kalman filter perturbation strategies on a simple model

References

• Anderson, J. L. 1996. Selection of initial conditions for ensemble forecasts in a simple perfect model framework. J. Atmos. Sc i. 53, 22–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L. 2001. An ensemble adjustment kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Re v. 129, 2884–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkmeijer, J., Buizza, R. and Palmer, T. N. 1999. 3D-Var Hessian singu-lar vectors and their potential use in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 2333–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. H., Etherton, B. J. and Majumdar, S. J. 2001 Adaptive sam-pling with the ensemble transform kalman filter. Part 1: theoretical aspects Mon. Wea. Re v. 129,420–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic, S. M. 1979. Digital and Kalman Filtering. Edward Arnold (Pub-lishers) Ltd., London.
   Google Scholar
• Buizza, R., Tribbia, J., Molteni, E and Palmer, T. 1993. Computation of optimal unstable structures for a numerical weather prediction model. Tellus 45A, 388–407.
   Google Scholar
• Buizza, R., Houtekamer, P. L., Toth, Z., Pellerin, G., Wei, M. and co-authors. 2005. Assessment of the status of global ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev. 133, 1076-1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza, M., Kalnay, E., Patil, D. J., Ott, E., Szunyogh, J. and co-authors 2002. Use of the breeding technique in the estimation of the back-ground error covariance matrix for a quasi-geostrophic model. In: Symposium on Observations, Data Assimilation, and Probabilistic Prediction, 13-17 January 2002, Orlando, Florida ANIS, Boston, MA, 154–157.
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., Mullen, S. L. and Sanders, E 1997. Short-range ensemble fore-casting of quantitative precipitation. Mon. Wea. Re v. 125,2427–2459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, G. 1994. Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using monte-carlo methods to forecast error statis-tics. J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans 99 (C5), 10 143-10 162.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, G. 2004. Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for the EnKF. http://www.nersc.no/-geir/EnKF/Publications/eve04a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. and Andersson, E. 2001. Developments in 4D-Var and Kalman filtering. ECMWF technical memo no. 347 ECMWF.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspari, G. and Cohn, S. E. 1999 Construction of correlation func-tions in two and three dimensions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 723–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill, T. M., Snyder, C. and Morss, R. E. 2000 A comparison of proba-bilistic forecasts from bred, singular-vector, and perturbed observation ensembles. Mon. Wea. Re v. 128, 1835–1851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtekamer, P. L. and Derome, J. 1995. Methods for ensemble predic-tion. Mon. Wea. Re v. 123, 2181–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaivre, L. and Derome, J. 1995 The RPN ensemble prediction system. In: Proceedings of the seminar on predictability (Reading, Berkshire, UK, 1995), vol. H, ECMWF, pp. 121–146.
   Google Scholar
• Houtekamer, P. L. and Mitchell, H. L. 1998. Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Re v. 126, 796–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalman, R. E. 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans. AMSE - .1. Basic Eng. 82 (D), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 1965. A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmo-spheric model. Tellus 17, 321–333.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 1995. Predictability: a problem partly solved. In: In Pro-ceedings of the seminar on predictability. Volume I, ECMWF, Read-ing, Berkshire, UK., pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. and Emanuel, K. A. 1998. Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: simulation with a small model. J. Atmos. Sc i. 55, 399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, H. L., Houtekamer, P. L. and Pellerin, G. 2002. Ensemble size, balance, and model-error representation in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Re v. 130, 2791–2808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molteni, E, Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T. 1996. The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 73–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, E., Hunt, B. R., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A. V., Kostelich, E., and co-authors. 2004. A local ensemble kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Tellus 56A, 415–428.
   Google Scholar
• Szunyogh, I., Kostelich, E., Gyarmati, G., Patil, D., Hunt, B., and co-authors. 2005. Assessing a local ensemble kalman filter: perfect model experiments with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction global model. Tellus 57A, 528–545.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. 1993. Ensemble forecasting at NNIC: the generation of perturbations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 74, 2317-2330.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. 1997. Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Re v. 125,3297–3319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. and Bishop, C. H. 2003. A comparison of breeding and en-semble transform kalman filter ensemble forecast schemes. J. Atmos. Sc i. 60, 1140–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Bishop, C. H. and killer, S. J. 2004. Which is better, an ensemble of positive-negative pairs or a centered spherical simplex ensemble? Mon. Wea. Re v. 132, 1590–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, M. and Toth, Z. 2003. A new measure of ensemble performance: perturbation versus error correlation analysis (PECA) Mon. Wea. Re v. 131, 1549–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, J. S. and Hamill, T. M. 2002. Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Re v. 130, 1913–1924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar