Pressure image assimilation for atmospheric motion estimation

References

• Andersson, E., Pailleux, J., Thepaut, J.-N., Eyre, J. R., McNally, A. P., and co-authors. 1994. Use of cloud-cleared radiances in three/four-dimensional variational data assimilation.Q. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 120, 627-653.
   Google Scholar
• Bayler, G., Aune, R. M. and Raymond, W. H. 2000. NWP cloud ini-tialization using GOES sounder data and improved modeling of non-precipitating clouds. Mon. Wea. Re v. 128, 3911–3920.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S., Kim, D. and Brown, J. 2002. Cloud/hydrometeor initial-ization in the 20-km RUC using GOES and radar data. In: Proceedings of 10th Conf on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology. Am. Meteor. Soc., Portland, Orlando, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, A. 1992. Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography. Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. and Thorburn, M. 1992. The generalized inverse of a non-linear quasigeotrophic ocean circulation model. J. Phys. Ocean. 22, 213–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, A., Chua, B. and Leslie, L. 1996. Generalized inversion of a global numerical weather prediction model. Meteor Atmos. Phys. 60, 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corpetti, T., Memin, E. and Perez, P. 2002. Dense estimation of fluid flows. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 24, 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corpetti, T., Heitz, D., Arroyo, G., Memin, E. and Santa-Cruz, A. 2006. Fluid experimental flow estimation based on an optical-flow scheme. Experiments in fluids 40, 80-97.
   Google Scholar
• Corpetti, T., Heas, P., Memin, E. and Papadalcis, N. 2008. Pressure im-age assimilation for atmospheric motion estimation. Research Report 6507, INRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Courtier, P. and Talagrand, J. 1990. Variational assimilation of me-teorological observations with the direct and adjoint shallow-water equations.Tellus 42A, 531-549.
   Google Scholar
• Courtier, P., Thepaut, J.-N. and Hollingsworth, A. 1994. A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-VAR, using an incremental approach.Q. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 120, 1367-1388.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzol, A., Hellier, P. and Memin, E. 2007. A low dimensional fluid motion estimator. Int. J. Comput. Vision 75, 329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzol, A. and Memin, E. 2008. A stochastic filter technique for fluid flows velocity fields tracking. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. in press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Adamo, J., Papadalcis, N., Memin, E. and Artana, G. 2007. Variational assimilation of pod low-order dynamical systems.J. Turbulence 8, 1-22.
   Google Scholar
• De Saint-Venant, A. 1871. Theorie du mouvement non-permanent des eaux, avec application aux crues des rivieres et a l’ introduction des marees dans leur lit. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris (in French) 73, 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Delanay, A. and Bresler, Y. 1998. Globally convergent edge-preserving regularized reconstruction: an application to limited-angle tomogra-phy. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7, 204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, U. 1995. Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Geman, D. and Reynolds, G. 1992. Constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 14(3), 367–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghil, M. and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P. 1991. Data assimilation in meteorol-ogy and oceanography. Adv. Geophys. 23, 141-266.
   Google Scholar
• Héas, P. and Memin, E. 2008.3D motion estimation of atmospheric layers from image sequences. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 46, 2385–2396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héas, P., Memin, E., Papadalcis, N. and Szantai, A. 2007. Layered es-timation of atmospheric mesoscale dynamics from satellite imagery. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45 (12), 4087-4104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund, K. 1998. The utilization of statistical properties of satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors to derive quality indicators. Wea. Forecast. 13, 1093–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, J. 2004. An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology 4th Edition. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, B. and Schunck, B. 1981. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intell. 17, 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, P. 1981. Robust Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. S. and Benjamin, S. G. 2000. Assimilation of cloud-top pressure derived from GOES sounder data into MAPS/RUC. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conf on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography Soc. Long Beach, CA, 110–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kurganov, A. and Tadmor, E. 2000. New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convetion-diffusion equations. J. Comput. Phys. 160, 241–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dimet, F.-X. and Blum, J. 2002. Assimilation de donnees pour les fluides geophysiques. MATAPLL Bulletin de la SMAI (in French) 67, 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dimet, F.-X. and Talagrand, J. 1986. Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects.Tellus 38A, 97-110.
   Google Scholar
• Leese, J., Novack, C. and Clark, B. 1971. An automated technique for obtained cloud motion from geosynchronous satellite data using cross correlation.J. AppL MeteoroL 10, 118-132.
   Google Scholar
• Lions, J. 1971. Optimal Control of Systems Governed by PDEs. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B. and Kanade, T. 1981. An iterative image registration tech-nique with an application to stereovision. In: Proceedings of the InL Joint Conf on Artificial Intel. (LICAI). Vancouver, BC, Canada, 674-679.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, H. 1999. Cloud processing for meteosat second generation. Techni-cal report, European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorolog-ical Satellites (EUMETSAT). Available at: http://www.eumetsat.de, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. N., Ferziger, J. H. and Reynolds, W. C. 1978. Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent mixing layer. Technical report No. TF-11, Thermosciences Div., Dept. of Mech. Eng., Standford University.
   Google Scholar
• Mémin, E. and Perez, P. 1998. Dense estimation and object-based seg-mentation of the optical flow with robust techniques.IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7, 703-719.
   Google Scholar
• Meneveau, C. and Katz, J. 2000. Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, W. R, Smith, W. L. and Stewart, T. 1983. Improved cloud motion wind vector and altitude assignment using vas. J. AppL MeteoroL 22, 377–384.
   Google Scholar
• Oksendal, B. 1998. Stochastic Differential Equations. Spinger-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, N. and Memin, E. 2007. A variational method for joint track-ing of curve and motion. Technical Report 6283, INRIA Research report.
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, N. and Memin, E. 2008. A variational technique for time consistent tracking of curves and motion. J. Math. Imaging Vision 31, 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis, N., Corpetti, T. and Memin, E. 2007. Dynamically con-sistent optical flow estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE InL Conf Comp. Vis. (ICCV ’07). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 14-20 October 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rabier, F., Thepaut, J.-N. and Courtier, P. 1998. Extended assim-ilation and forecasts experiments with a four-dimensional varia-tional assimilation system. Quat. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 124, 1861–1888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhnau, P. and Schnorr, C. 2007. Optical stokes flow estimation: an imaging-based control approach.Exp. Fluids 42, 61-78.
   Google Scholar
• Sagaut, P. 1998. Introduction a la simulation des grandes echelles pour les ecoulements de fluide incompressible, Collection: Mathematiques et applications 30 (in French). Springer Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Schmetz, J., Holmlund, K., Hoffman, J., Strauss, B., Mason, B. and co-authors. 1993. Operational cloud-motion winds from meteosat in-frared images.J. AppL Meteorol. 32, 1206-1225.
   Google Scholar
• Schmetz, J., Geijo, C., Menzel, W. P., Strabala, K., Van De Berg, L. and co-authors. 1995. Satellite observations of upper tropospheric relative humidity, clouds and wind field divergence. Contrib. Atmos. Phys. 68, 345-357.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primi-tive equations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 91(3), 99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Talagrand, J. 1997. Assimilation of observations, an introduction.J. MeteoroL Soc. Jap. 75, 191-209.
   Google Scholar
• Talagrand, J. and Courtier, P. 1987. Variational assimilation of meteo-rological observations with the adjoint voracity equation, I: theory.J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 113, 1311-1328.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. 1932. The transport of voracity and heat through fluids in turbulent motion. In Proc London Math Soc. Ser A,151-421.
   Google Scholar
• Vidard, P., Blayo, E., Le Dimet, F.-X. and Piacentini, A. 2000. 4d variational data analysis with imperfect model. Flow, Turbulence Com-bustion 65, 489-504.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. and Shu, C.-W. 2006. Anti-diffusive finite difference weno meth-ods for shallow water with transport of pollutant. J. Comput. Math. 24,239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., Schnoerr, C. and Memin, E. 2007. Discrete orthogonal decom-position and variational fluid flow estimation.J. Math. Imaging Vision 28, 67-80.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Kambhamettu, C. and Goldgof, D. 2000. Fluid structure and motion analysis from multi-spectrum 2D cloud images sequences. In: Proc. Conf Comp. Vision Pattern Rec. Volume 2. Hilton Head Island, USA, 744–751.
   Google Scholar