Ensemble prediction for nowcasting with a convection-permitting model—I: description of the system and the impact of radar-derived surface precipitation rates

References

• Bannister, R., Migliorini, S. and Dixon, M. 2011. Ensemble prediction with a convection-permitting model for nowcasting. Part II: Forecast error statistics. Tel/us 63A, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, S., Takacs, L., da Silva, A. and Ledvina, D. 1996. Data as-similation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Wea. Rev. 124, 1256–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, N. E., Arribas, A., Mylne, K. R., Robertson, K. B. and Beare, S. E. 2008. The MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc. 134, 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 2009. Limited area modelling in CRM mode. In: Proceedings of the ECMWF Seminar on Parametrization of Subgrid Physical Processes. ECMWF, 165-192. Available at: http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T., Cullen, M. J. P., Malcolm, A. J., Mawson, M. H., Stani-forth, A., and co-authors. 2005. A new dynamical core for the Met Office’s global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc. 131, 1759–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, M., Li, Z., Lean, H., Roberts, N. and Ballard, S. 2009. Impact of data assimilation on forecasting convection over the United Kingdom using a high-resolution version of the Met Office Unified Model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 137, 1562–1584.
   Google Scholar
• Done, J. M., Craig, G. C., Gray, S. L., Clark, P. A. and Gray, M. E. B. 2006. Mesoscale simulations of organized convection: importance of convective equilibrium. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc. 132, 737–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, J. M. and Carbone, R. R. 2004. Improving quantitative precipi-tation forecasts in the warm season: a USWRP research and develop-ment strategy. Bull. Amer Meteor. Soc. 85, 955–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, M. S., Straka, J. M. and Rasmussen, E. N. 2004. Precipi-tation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle param-eters within a simple microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev. 132, 2610–2627.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, B. W. 1998. Nimrod: a system for generating automated very short range forecasts. Meteor Appl. 5, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hamill, T. M. 2001. Interpretation of rank histograms for verifying ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev. 129, 550–560.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. L., Driscoll, S. J. and Kitchen, M. 2000. Improving precip-itation estimates from weather radar using quality control and correc-tion techniques. Meteor. AppL 7, 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenegger, C. and Schär, C. 2007. Predictability and error growth dynamics in cloud-resolving models. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 4467–4478.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D. and Macpherson, B. 1997. A latent heat nudging scheme for the assimilation of precipitation data into an operational mesoscale model. Meteor. AppL 4, 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Koizumi, K., Ishilcawa, Y. and Tsuyulci, T. 2005. Assimilation of pre-cipitation data to the JMA mesoscale model with a four-dimensional variational method and its impact on precipitation forecasts. SOLA 1, 45–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, H. W., Clark, P. A., Dixon, M., Roberts, N. M., Fitch, A. and co-authors. 2008. The Met. Office global three-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc. 131, 1759–1782.
   Google Scholar
• Lilly, D. K. 1990. Numerical prediction of thunderstorms-has its time come? Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc. 116, 779–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorene, A. C., Ballard, S. P., Bell, R. S., Ingleby, N. B., Andrews, P. L. E and co-authors. 2000. Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Wea. Rev. 136, 3408-3424.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, B., Wright, B. J., Hand, W. H. and Maycock, A. J. 1996. The impact of MOPS moisture data in the U.K. Meteorological Office Mesoscale Data Assimilation Scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev. 124, 1746–1766.
   Google Scholar
• Mass, C. F., Ovens, D., Westrick, K. and Colle, B. A. 2002. Does in-creasing horizontal resolution produce more skilful forecasts? Bull. Amer Meteor. Soc. 83,407–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, C., Fillion, L. and Zwack, P. 2007. Diagnosing summertime mesoscale vertical motion: implications for atmospheric data assimi-lation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 135, 2076–2094.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. K. and Droegemeier, K. K. 2000. Sensitivity analysis of a 3D convective storm: implications for variational data assimilation and forecast error. Mon. Wea. Rev. 128, 140–159.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, C. A., Talagrand, 0. and Bocquet, M 2010. Diagnosis and im-pacts of non-Gaussianity of innovations in data assimilation. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 239, 1701–1717.
   Google Scholar
• Sakov, P. and Oke, P. R. 2008. Implications of the form of the ensemble transformation in the ensemble square root filters. Mon. Wea. Rev. 136, 1042–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Stensrud, D. J., Xue, M., Wicker, L. J., Kelleher, K. E., Foster, M. P. and co-authors. 2009. Convective-scale warn-on-forecast system. Bull. Amer. Meteor Soc. 90, 1487-1499.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. 2005. Convective-scale assimilation of radar data: progress and challenges. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc. 131, 3439–3463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talagrand, O., Vautard, R. and Strauss, B. 1997. Evaluation of proba-bilistic prediction systems. In: Proceedings, ECMWF Workshop on Predictability, Shinfield Park, Reading, UK, 1-25.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, M. and Xue, M. 2008. Simultaneous estimation of microphysi-cal parameters and atmospheric state with radar data and ensemble Kalman filter. Part I: Sensitivity analysis and parameter identifiability. Mon. Wea. Rev. 136, 1630–1648.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. and Bishop, C. H. 2003. A comparison of breeding and en-semble transform Kalman filter ensemble forecast schemes. J. Atmos. Sci 60, 1140–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Bishop, C. H. and Julier, S. J. 2004. Which is better, an ensemble of positive-negative pairs or a centered spherical simplex ensemble?. Mon. Wea. Rev. 132, 1590–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, D. S. 2006. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 2nd edition, Volume 59. International Geophysics Series. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. R. and Ballard, S. P. 1999. A microphysically based pre-cipitation scheme for the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 131, 1607–1636.
   Google Scholar