Validation of a mesoscale weather prediction model using subdomain budgets

References

• Baldauf, M. 2008. A tool for testing conservation properties in the COSMO-model, COSMO Newsletter No. 7, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M., Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, A. 1989. A positive definite advection scheme obtained by non-linear renormalization of the advective fluxes. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 1006–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, G. H. and Fritsch, J. M. 2002. A benchmark simulation for moist nonhydrostatic numerical models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 130, 2917–2928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catry, B., Geleyn, J.-F., Tudor, M., Benard, P. and Trojälcova, A. 2007. Flux-conservative thermodynamic equations in a mass-weighted framework. Tellus 59A, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Doms, G. 2004. Test of the moisture mass conservation in LM, COSMO Newsletter No. 3, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M., Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Doms, G. and Schaettler, U. 2002. A description of the nonhydrostatic Regional Model LM - part I: dynamics and numerics, DWD Docu-mentation, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M., Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Doms, G., Foerstner, J., Heise, E., Herzog, H.-J., Raschendorfer, M. and co-authors. 2002. A description of the nonhydrostatic Regional Model LM - part II: physical parametrization, DWD Documentation, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M., Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Doswell, C. A. and Rasmussen, E. N. 1994. The effect of neglecting the virtual temperature correction on cape calculation. Wea. Forecast. 9, 625–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudhia, J. 1993. A nonhydrostatic version of the penn state-ncar mesoscale model: validation tests and simulation of an atlantic cy-clone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 1493–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durran, D. R. 1999. Numerical methods for wave equations in geophys-ical fluid dynamics. In: Texts in Applied Mathematics, 1st Edition. (ed. Durran, D. R.). Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel, K. A. (ed.) 1994. Atmospheric convection, 1st Edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ferziger, J. H. and Peric, M. 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. In: Motion and Motion Systems, 3rd Edition (eds. Ferziger, J. H. and Peric, M.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Förstner, J., Baldauf, M. and Seifert, A. 2006. Courant number inde-pendent advection of the moisture quantities for the LMK, COSMO Newsletter No. 6, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M., Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gassmann, A. 2002. Nummerische Verfahren in der nichthydrostatis-chen Modellierung und ihr Einfluss auf die Giite der Nieder-schlagsvorhersage. PhD thesis, University of Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Gassmann, A. and Herzog, H.-J. 2008. Towards a consistent numerical compressible nonhydrostatic model using generalized hamiltonian tools. Quart. J. R. Meteor Soc. 134, 1597–1613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, S., Willoughby, H. and Piotrowicz, J. 1984. Role of parameterized ice-phase microphysics in an axisymmetric nonhydrostatic tropical cyclone model. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2836–2848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh, M. 2003. Conservative scheme for a compressible nonhydrostatic model with moist processes. Mon. Wea. Rev. 131, 1033–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliinzen, K. H. 1997. On the validation of high-resolution atmospheric mesoscale models. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 67,68, 479–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliinzen, K. H., Stahlschmidt, T., Rebers, A., Niemeier, U., Kriews, M. and co-authors. 1997. Concept and realization of the mesoscale transport-and fluid-model `METRAS’, METRAS Techn. Rep, Mete-orologisches Institut, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M. and co-authors. 2005. A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 2, NCAR Tech. Note, Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Devision NCAR, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Staniforth, A. and Cote, J. 1991. Semi-lagrangian integration schemes for atmospheric model: a review. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 2206–2223.
   Google Scholar
• Steppeler, J., Doms, G., Schättler, U., Bitzer, H. W., Gassmann, A., and co-authors. 2003. Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydro-static model LM. Meteor. Atmos. Phys. 82, 75-96.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedtke, M. 1989. A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 1779–1799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker, U., Frisius, T. and Herbert, F. 2006. Evaporation and precip-itation surface effects in local mass continuity laws of moist air. J. Atmos. Sci. 63, 2642–2652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker, U. and Herbert, F. 2003. Continuity equations as expressions for local balances of masses in cloudy air. Tellus 55, 247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Weisman, M. L. and Klemp, J. B. 1982. The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev. 110, 504–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicker, L. J. and Slcamarock, W. C. 2002. Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev. 130, 2088–2097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, M., Droegemeier, K. K. and Wong, V. 2000. ARPS: a multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. part I : model dynamics and verification. Meteor Atmos. Physics. 75, 161–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar