Climate-carbon cycle feedbacks under stabilization: uncertainty and observational constraints

References

• Andreae, M.O., Jones, C. D. and Cox, P. M.2005. Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future. Nature 435, 1187–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Andronova, N. G. and Schlesinger, M. E. 2001. Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 22 605-22 612.
   Google Scholar
• Annan, J. and Hargreaves, J. C. 2006. Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L06704. 10.1029/2005GL025259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annan, J. D., Hargreaves, J. C., Ohgaito, R., Abe-Ouchi, A. and Emori, S. 2005. Efficiently constraining climate sensitivity with ensembles of paleoclimate simulations. SOLA 1, 181–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C. and Berry, J. A. 1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: A model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric. For MeteoroL 54, 107–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collatz, G. J., Ribas-Carbo, M. and Berry, J. A. 1992. A coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for leaves of C4 plants. Aust. J. Plant PhysioL 19, 519–538.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. M. 2001. Description of the TRIFFID Dynamic Global Vegeta-tion Model, Technical Note 24, Hadley Centre, Met Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A. and Tonerdell, I. J. 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon—cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408, 184–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, P.M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A. and Tonerdell, I. J. 2001. Modelling vegetation and the carbon cycle as interactive elements of the climate system. In: Meteorology at the Millennium (ed. R. Pearce), pp. 259-279. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C. and Harding, R. J. 1998. A canopy con-ductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme. J. HydroL 212-213, 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Eliseev, A. V. and Mokhov, I. I. 2006. Carbon cycle-climate feedback sensitivity to parameter changes of a zero-dimensional terrestrial car-bon cycle scheme in a climate model of intermediate complexity. Theor. AppL Climatol., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R. and Web-ster, M. D. 2002. Quantifying uncertainties in climate system prop-erties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295, 113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, P., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Dufresne, J.-L., Fairhead, L. and co-authors. 2001. Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1543–1546.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, R, Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W. and co-authors.2006. Climate—carbon cycle feedback analysis, results
   Google Scholar
• from the C4MILP model intercomparison. Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, No. 14, pp. 3337-3353. 10.1175/J0L13800.1.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, P., Dufresne, J. L., Cox, P. M. and Rayner, P. 2003. How positive is the feedback between climate change and the carbon cycle?. Tellus 55B, 692–700.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H., Gregory, J. M. and co-authors.2000. The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dyn. 16, 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Govindasamy, B., Thompson, S., Mirin, A., Wickett, M., Caldeira, K. and co-authors.2005. Increase of carbon cycle feedback with climate sensitivity: results from a coupled climate and carbon cycle model. Tellus 57B, 153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J., Raper, S. C. B., Stott, P. A. and Rayner, N. A. 2002. An observationally based estimate of the climate sensi-tivity. J. Climate 15, 3117–3121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. D. D. and Kaufmann, R. K. 2002. Simultaneously constrain-ing climate sensitivity and aerosol radiative forcing. J. Climate 15, 2837–2861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegerl, G. C., Crowley, T. J., Hyde, W. T. and Frame, D. J. 2006. Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries. Nature 440, 1029–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. and co-authors.2001. Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, R. A. and Hackler, J. L. 2002. Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes. In: Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.
   Google Scholar
• Huntingford, C. and Cox, P. M. 2000. An analogue model to derive additional climate change scenarios from existing GCM simulations. Clim. Dyn. 16, 575–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntingford, C., Cox, P. M. and Lenton, T. M. 2000. Contrasting re-sponses of a simple terrestrial ecosystem model to global change. EcoL Model. 134,41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D. and Cox, P. M. 2001. Constraints on the temperature sensi-tivity of global soil respiration from the observed interannual variabil-ity in atmospheric CO2. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 10.1006/asle.2000.0041.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D., Cox, P. M., Essery, R. L. H., Roberts, D. L. and Woodage, M. J. 2003a. Strong carbon cycle feedbacks in a climate model with interactive CO2 and sulphate aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 10.1029/2003GL016867.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D., Cox, P. M. and Huntingford, C. 2003b. Uncertainty in climate-carbon cycle projections associated with the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature. Taus 55B, 642–648.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D., Cox, P. M. and Huntingford, C. 2006. Impact of climate-carbon cycle feedbacks on emission scenarios to achieve stabiliza-tion. In: Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change Chapter 34 (eds. H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley and G. Yohe). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Joos, F., Bruno, M., Fink, R., Siegenthaler, U., Stocker, T. E and co-authors.1996. An efficient and accurate representation of com-plex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake. Tellus 48B, 397–417.
   Google Scholar
• Joos, F., Meyer, R., Bruno, M. and Leuenberger, M. 1999. The variability in the carbon sink as reconstructed for the last 1000 years. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1437–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr, W., Prentice, I. C., House, J. I. and Holland, E. A. 2005. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433, 298–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti, R., Joos, F., Muller, S. A., Plattner, G. K. and Stocker, T. F. 2005. Probabilistic climate change projections for CO2 stabilization profiles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 10.1029/2005GL023294.
   Google Scholar
• Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F. and Plattner, G. K. 2002. Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416, 719–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marland, G., Boden, T. A. and Andres, R. J. 2005. Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions In: Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrandrea, M. D. and Schneider, S. H. 2006. Probabilistic assess-ment of ‘dangerous’ climate change and emissions scenarios: Stake-holder metrics and overshoot pathways. In: Avoiding Dangerous Cli-mate Change chapter 27 (eds.H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley and G. Yohe). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, H. D. 2005. Decrease of emissions required to stabilize atmo-spheric CO2 due to positive carbon cycle-climate feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 10.1029/2005GL023435.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, H. D. 2006. Emissions targets for CO2 stabilization as mod-ified by carbon cycle feedbacks. Tellus 58B, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, H. D., Eby, M., Weaver, A. J. and Hawkins, B. J. 2005. Primary productivity control of the simulated climate-carbon cycle feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 10.1029/2005GL022941. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, 0. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnera-bility, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. D., Melillo, J. M., Joyce, L. M., Kicklighter, D. M., Grace, A. L., Moore, B. and Vorosmarty, C. J. 1992. Interactions between carbon and nitrogen dynamics in estimating net primary productivity for potential vegetation in North America. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6, 101–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinshausen, M. 2006. What does a 2 °C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? a briefanalysis based on multi-gas emission path-ways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. In: Avoid-ing Dangerous Climate Change Chapter 28 (eds. H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley and G. Yohe). Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Melnikov, N. B. and O'Neill, B. C. 2006. Learning about the carbon cycle from global budget data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, 10.1029/2005GL023935.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J., Collins, M. and Stainforth, D. A. 2004. Quantification of mod-elling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430, 768–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalciéenovié, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J. and co-authors.2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 599pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pachauri, R. 2006. Avoiding dangerous climate change. In: Avoid-ing Dangerous Climate Change Chapter 1 (eds. H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley and G. Yohe). Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. E., Folland, C. K. and Jackson, M. 1995. Marine surface temperature: observed variations and data requirements. Clim. Change 31, 559–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Fasham, M. J. R., Goulden, M. L., Heimann, M. and co-authors.2001. The carbon cycle and atmo-spheric carbon dioxide. In: Climate Change 2001: The scientific ba-sis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Chapter 3 (eds. J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. van der Lin-den, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. I. Johnson). pp. 183-237, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. L., Dixon, K. W., Gnanadesilcan, A., Stouffer, R. J. and Toggweiler, J. R. 2006. The southern hemisphere westerlies in a warm-ing world: Propping open the door to the deep ocean. J. Climate, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. H. and Lane, J. 2006. An overview of dangerous climate change. In: Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change Chapter 2 (eds. H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nalcicenovic, T. Wigley and G. Yohe). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Collatz, C. J., Berry, J. A., Field, C. B. and co-authors.1996. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: Model formulation. J. Climate 9,676–705.
   Google Scholar
• Stainforth, D. A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Frame and co-authors.2005. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate re-sponse to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433, 403–406.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. L., Govindasamy, B., Mirin, A., Caldeira, K., Delire, C. and co-authors.2004. Quantifying the effects of CO2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 10.1029/2004GL021239.
   Google Scholar
• von Deimling, T. S., Held, H., Ganopolslci, A. and Rahmstorf, S. 2006. Climate sensitivity estimated from ensemble simulations of glacial climate. Clim. Dyn. 27. 149-163. 10.1007/s00382-006-0126-8.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. and Edmonds, J. A. 1996. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 con-centrations. Nature 379, 242–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, N., Qian, H., Munoz, E. and Iacono, R. 2004. How strong is carbon cycle-climate feedback under global warming? Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 10.1029/2004GL020904.
   Google Scholar