Interannual variation and trends in air pollution over Europe due to climate variability during 1958–2001 simulated with a regional CTM coupled to the ERA40 reanalysis

References

• Andersson, C. and Largner, J. 2005. Interannual variations of ozone and nitrogen dioxide over Europe during 1958-2003 simulated with a regional CTM. Accepted to the Acid Rain, 2005, Journal special issue of Focus: Water, Air and Soil Pollution.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., Beljaars, A., Chevallier, E, HOlm, E., Janiskovd, M. and co-authors. 2005. Assimilation and modelling of the hydrological cy-cle in the ECMWF forecasting system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 387–402.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, L., Hagemann, S. and Hodges, K. I. 2004. Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? J. Geophys. Res. 109(D11), D11111, 10.1029/2004JD004536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, E. 1993. Coupling of wet scavenging of sulphur to clouds in a numerical weather prediction model. Tellus 45B, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, A. 1989. A positive definite advection scheme obtained by non-linear renormalization of advective fluxes. Month. Weath. Rev. 117, 1006–1015.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. P. L. 1996. Condensed atmospheric photo oxidation mecha-nisms for isoprene. Atmosph. Env. 30, 4275–4290.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, M., Jacob, D. J., Gardner, G. M., Foreman-Fowler, M. S. and Spiro, P. A. 1996. A global three-dimensional model of tropospheric sulphate. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (D13), 18667-18 690.
   Google Scholar
• Dameris, M., Grewe, V., Kohler, R., Sausen, R., Brfihl, C. and co-authors. 1998. Impact of aircraft NO emissions on tropospheric and strato-spheric ozone. Part II: 3-D model results. Atmosph. Env., 3185-3199.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, M. T. and Hales, J. M. 1976. Statistical aspects of the washout of polydisperse aerosols. Atm. Env. 10, 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Serves, C. 1994. Gas phase formaldehyde and peroxide measure-ments in the Arctic atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 99(D12), 25 391-25 398.
   Google Scholar
• EMEP/CCC, 1999. EMEP measurement data. URL: http://www.emep.int, Jan. and Jul. 2001 (ozone) and Apr. 2003 (other compounds).
   Google Scholar
• Foltescu, V. L., Pryor, C. S. and Bennet, C. 2005. Sea salt generation, dispersion and removal on the regional scale. Atm. Env. 39, 2123–2133.
   Google Scholar
• Fusco, A. C. and Logan, J. A. 2003. Analysis of 1970-1995 trends in tro-pospheric ozone at Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes with the GEOS-CHEM model./. Geophys. Res. 108(D15), 4449–4473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidhagen, L., Johansson, C., Langner, J. and Foltescu, V. L. 2005. Urban scale modeling of particle number concentration in Stockholm. Atm. Env. 39, 1711–1725.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, S. L., Barrie, L. A. and Blanchet, J.-P. 1997. Modeling sea-salt aerosols in the atmosphere. 1. Model development. J. Geophys. Res. 102(D3), 3805–3818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grermfelt, P. and Hov, 0. 2005. Regional air pollution at a turning point. Ambio 34 (1), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., Arpe, K. and Bengtsson, L. 2005. Validation of the hydrological cycle of ERA40, ERA40 Project Report Series, No. 24. European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts. http://www.ecmwf@int
   Google Scholar
• Hjellbrekke, A. G. 2001. Data report 1999. Acidifying and eutrophying compounds. Part 2: monthly and seasonal summaries. EMEP/CCC-Report 03/2001. Internet URL: http://www.nilu.no, 25 May 2005. Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. E, Arkin, A., Chang, A., Ferraro, R. and co-authors. 1997. The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation data set. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 78, 5–20. Jonson, J. E., Simpson, D., Fagerli, H. and Solberg, S. 2006. Can we explain the trends in European ozone levels? Atmos. Chem. and Phys. 6,51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kanakidou, M., Singh, H. B., Valentin, K. M. and Crutzen, P. J. 1991. A two dimensional study of ethane and propane oxidation in the tropo-sphere. J. Geophys. Res. 96(D8), 15 395-15 413.
   Google Scholar
• Koutrakis, P., Wolfson, J. M., Spengler, J. D., Stern, B. and Franklin, C. A. 1989. Equilibrium size of atmospheric aerosol sulfates as a function of the relative humidity./. Geophys. Res. 94,6442–6448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac, N., 2002. Mandatory data checking for the EMEP assess-ment. Environmental Agency of Slovenia, Monitoring office, air quality section, 2 pp. Internet URL: http://www.nilu.no/projects/ ccc/sitedescriptions/si/index.html, 27 May 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, K. B., Rohrer, E, Grobler, E. S. and Ehhalt, D. H. 1996. The global trorpspheric distribution of NO estimated by a three-dimensional chemical tracer model. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (D13), 18 587-18 604. Milberg, P. 1997. Aspects of the re-analysed climate ECMWF Reanal. Proj. Rep. Ser. 2, 89. European Centre For Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Langner, J., Bergstrom, R. and Pleijel, K. 1998. European scale model-ing of sulphur, oxidized nitrogen and photochemical oxidants. Model
   Google Scholar
• development and evaluation for the 1994 growing season, SMHE re-port, RMK No. 82, Swedish Met. and Hydrol. Inst., Norrkoping, Swe-den.
   Google Scholar
• Langner, J., Bergstrom, R. and Foltescu, V. L. 2005. Impact of climate change on surface ozone and deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe. Atm. Env. 39, 1129–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelieveld, J. and Dentener, E 2000. What controls tropospheric ozone?. J. Geophys. Res. 105(D3), 3531–3551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovblad, G., Tarrason, L., Torseth, K. and Dutchak, S. (eds), 2004. EMEP Assessment, Part 1, European Perspective, EMEP MSC-W, Oslo, October 2004. URL: http://www.emep.int/index_assessment.html
   Google Scholar
• Moxim, W. J., Levy, H. and Kasibhatla, P. S. 1996. Simulated global tropospheric PAN: Its transport and impact on NOR. .1. Geophys. Res. 101(D7), 12 621-12 638.
   Google Scholar
• Martensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de L,eeuw, G., Cohen, L. H. and Hansson, H.-C. 2003. Laboratory simulations and parametrization of the primary marine aerosol production. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D9), 10.1029/2002JD002263.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, E. C., Spiel, D. E. and Davidson, K. L. 1986. A model of marine aerosol generation via whitecaps and wave disruption. In: Oceanic Whitecaps and Their Role in Air-Sea Exchange (eds E. C. Monahan and G. Mac Niocaill). D Reidel, Norwell, MA, pp. 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Nds, A., Moldanovd, J., Lindskog, A., Bergstrom, R. and Langner, J. 2003. Identification and management of critical environmental im-pacts from air transportation over North Europe EIATNE. URL: http://www.eiatne.se/intemt/F0I-S-1041-SE-EIATNE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peters, W., Krol, M., Dentener, E and Lelieveld, J. 2001. Identification of an El Nino-southern Oscillation signal in a multilayer global sim-ulation of tropospheric ozone. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (D10), 10389-10 402.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. L. and Ondov, J. M. 1998. Influence of temporal changes in relative humidity on dry deposition velocities and fluxes of aerosol particles bearing trace elements. Atm. Env. 32, 3467–3479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, L., Langner, J. and Engardt, M. 1999. An Eulerian limited-area atmospheric transport model. J. Appl. Met. 38, 190–210.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, M., Beekman, M., Bergstrom, R., Boersen, G., Feldman, H., and co-authors. 2003. Ozone trends according to ten disper-sion models, EUROTRAC-2, http://www.mep.tno.nl/eurotrac, click on EUROTRAC-trends.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, P., Derwent, R., Manning, A. and Spain, G. 2004. Significant growth in surface ozone at Mace Head, Ireland 1987-2003. Atm. Env. 38, 4769–4778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J., Jones, P. D., da Costa Bechtold, V.,Beljaars, C. M., Milberg, P. W. and co-authors. 2004. Comparison of trends and low-frequency variability in CRU, ERA40, and NCEP/NCAR analy-ses of surface air temperature. J. Geophys. Res. 109 (D24), D24115, 10.1029/2004JD005306.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D., Andersson-Skold, Y. and Jenkin, M. E. 1993. Updating the chemical scheme for the EMEP MSC-W oxidant model: current status, EMEP MSC-W Note 2/93.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N. and Steinbrecher, R. 1995. Bio-genic emissions in Europe. 1. Estimates and uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 22875–22890.
   Google Scholar
• Siniarovina, U. and Engardt, M. 2005. High-resolution model simula-tions of anthropogenic sulphate and sulphur dioxide in Southeast Asia. Atm. Env. 39, 2021–2034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjelkvale, B. L., Evans, C., Larssen, T., Hindar, A. and Raddum, G. G. 2003. Recovery from acidification in European surface waters: A review to the future. Ambio 30(3), 170–175.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, S., Bergstrom, R., Langner, J., Laurila, T., Sjoberg, K. and co-authors. 2002. Changes in ozone episodes due to emission reduc-tions - A Nordic study. EMEP/CCC-Report 10/2002, Norwegian In-stitute for Air Research, P.O. Box 100, No-2027 Kjeller, Norway. URL: http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/reports/cccr10-2002.pdf Solberg, S., Bergstrom, R., Langner, J., Laurila, T. and Lindskog, A. 2005a. Changes in Nordic ozone episodes due to European emission reductions in the 1990s. Atm. Env. 39, 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, S., Derwent, R. G., Hov, 0., Langner, J. and Lindskog, A., 2005b. European abatement of surface ozone in a global perspective. Ambio 34(1), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J. L., Jeffries, D. S., Lukeswille, A., Clair, T. A., Dillon, P. J. and co-authors. 1999. Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe 1980-1995. Nature 40, 575–578.
   Google Scholar
• Svenningsson, B., Hansson, H.-C., Wiedensohler, A., Noone, K., Ogren, J. and co-authors. 1994. Hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles and its influence on nucleation scavenging in cloud: experimental results from Keiner Feldberg. J. Atm. Chem. 19, 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Swietlicki, E., Zhou, J., Berg, 0. H., Martinsson, B. G., Frank, G. and co-authors. 1999. A closure study of sub-micrometer aerosol particle hygroscopic behaviour. Atm. Env. 50, 205–240.
   Google Scholar
• Swietlicki, E., Zhou, J., Covert, D. S, Hämeri, K., Busch, B. and co-authors. 2000. Hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles in the north-eastern Atlantic during ACE-2. Tellus 52B, 201–227.
   Google Scholar
• Tilmes, S., Brandt, J., Flatoy, E, Bergstrom, R., Flemming, J. and co-authors. 2002. Comparison of five Eulerian air pollution forecasting systems for the summer of 1999 using the German ozone monitoring data./. Atm. Chem. 42,91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tsyro, S. G. 2005. To what extent can water explain the discrepancy between model calculated and gravimetric PMio and PM2.5?. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5,515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppala, S., Milberg, P., Hernandez, A., Saarinen, S., Fiorino, M. and co-authors. 2004. ERA40:ECMWF 45-year reanalysis of the global atmosphere and surface conditions 1957-2002. ECMWF Newsletter 101,2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Uppala, S. M., Milberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., da Costa Bechtold, V. and co-authors. 2005. The ERA40 re-analysis. Quart. .1. Roy. Met. Soc. 131B, 2961–3012.
   Google Scholar
• van Loon, M., Roemer, M. G. M., Builtjes, P. J. H., Bessagnet, B., Rouil, L. and co-authors. 2004. Model inter-comparison. In the framework of the review of the unified EMEP model, TNO-report, TNO-MEP - R 2004/282, 53 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Vestreng, V. 2003. EMEP/MSC-W Technical report. Review and Revi-sion. Emission data reported to CLRTAP, MSC-W Status Report 2003. EMEP/MSC-W Note 1/2003. ISSN 0804–2446.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Gong, S., Padro, J. and Barrie, L. 2001. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atm. Env. 35, 549–560.
   Google Scholar