Assessing the impact of crops on regional CO₂ fluxes and atmospheric concentrations

References

• Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J. D., Bakwin, P. S., Zhao, C. and Tans, P. 2009. Carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide dry air mole fractions from the NOAA ESRL tall tower network, 1992-2009. Version: 2009-05-12, ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/towers/.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, I. T. and Denning, A. S. 2008. SiB3 modeled global 1-degree hourly biosphere-atmosphere carbon flux, 1998-2006. In: Data set. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, http://daac.ornl.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L. H., Olson, R., Hollinger, D. and co-authors. 2001. FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. B. Am. Meteor Soc. 82, 2415-2434.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, R. A. 2005. Integrated approaches to climate-crop modelling: needs and challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 2049–2065, doi:10/1098/rstb.2005.1739.
   Google Scholar
• Bonan, G. B. 1997. Effects of land use on the climate of the United States. Climatic Change 37,449–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W. and co-authors. 2007. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biol. 13, 679-706, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, J. H., PieIke, R. A. and Kittel, T. G. F. 1996. Potential climatic impacts of vegetation change: a regional modeling study. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos 101(D3), 7409–7418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, K. D., Denning, A. S., Lu, L., Wang, J.-W. and Baker, I. T. 2008. Using a high resolution coupled ecosystem-atmosphere model to es-timate representation errors in inversions of satellite CO2 retrievals. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos 113(D02301), doi:10.1029/2007JDO08716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson, E. R. 2008. A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring at-mospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor. AppL Phys. B 92 (3), 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, A. S., Nicholls, M., Prihodko, L., Baker, I. T., Vidale, P.-L. and co-authors. 2003. Simulated variations in atmospheric CO2 over a Wisconsin forest using a coupled ecosystem-atmosphere model. Global Change Biol. 9, 1241-1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Noblet-Ducoudre, N., Gervois, S., Ciais, R, Viovy, N., Brisson, N. and co-authors. 2004. Coupling the Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere-Transfer Scheme ORCHIDEE to the agronomy model STICS to study the influence of croplands on the European carbon and water budgets. Agronomie 24, 397-407, doi:10.1051/agro:2004038.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration. 2007. Emissions of greenhouse gases. Report DOE/EIA-0573. Office of Integrated Analysis and Fore-casting. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 64.
   Google Scholar
• Frietas, S. R., Longo, K. M., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Silva Dias, P. L., Chat-field, R. and co-authors. 2005. Monitoring the transport of biomass burning emissions in South America. Environ. Fluid Mech. 5(1-2), 135-167.
   Google Scholar
• Gervois, S., de Noblet-Ducoudre, N., Viovy, N. and Ciais, P. 2004. Including croplands in a global biosphere model: methodology and evaluation at specific sites. Earth Interact. 8 (16), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Griffis, T. J., Sargent, S. D., Baker, J. M., Lee, X., Tanner, B. D. and co-authors. 2008. Direct measurement of biosphere-atmosphere isotopic CO2 exchange using the eddy covariance technique. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 113(D08304), doi:10.1029/2007JDO09297.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, K. R., Mendoza, D. L., Thou, Y., Fischer, M. L., Miller, C. C. and co-authors. 2009. High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States. Environ. Sci. TechnoL 43, doi:10.1021/es900806c.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, R. A. 2003. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850-2000. Tellus 55B, 378–390.
   Google Scholar
• International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP). 2000. Global soil data products CD-ROM (IGBP-DIS). In: Global Soil Data Task. Data and Information System, Potsdam, Germany. Available from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributive Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, http://www.daac.ornl.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, I. A., Freibauer, A., Ciais, R, Smith, P., Nabuurs, G.-J. and co-authors. 2003. Europe's terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science 300 (5625), 1538-1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D. M. and Slingo, J. M. 2004. An annual cycle of vegetation in a GCM. Part II: Global impacts on climate and hydrology. Climate Dyn. 22, 107–122, doi:10.1007/s00382-003-0367-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokupitiya, E., Breidt, F. J., Lokupitiya, R., Williams, S. and Paustian, K. 2007. Deriving comprehensive county-level crop yield and area data for U.S. cropland. Agron. J., 99 (3), 673–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokupitiya, E., Denning, A. S., Paustian, K., Baker, I. T., Schaefer, K. and co-authors. 2009. Incorporation of crop phenology in Sim-ple Biosphere Model (SiBcrop) to improve land-atmosphere carbon exchanges from croplands. Biogeosciences 6, 969-986.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Denning, A. S., da Silva-Dias, M. A., da Silva-Dias, P., Longo, M. and co-authors. 2005. Mesoscale circulations and atmospheric CO2 variations in the Tapajos Region, Para, Brazil. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 110(D21102), doi:10.1029/2004JD005757.
   Google Scholar
• Matamala, R., Jastrow, D. J., Miller, R. M. and Garten, C. 2008. Tempo-ral changes in the distribution of C and N stocks in a restored tallgrass prairie in the U.S. Midwest. EcoL Appl. 18, 1470–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesinger, E, DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C. and co-authors. 2006. North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Am. MeteoroL Soc. 87 (3), 343-360.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E., Denning, A. S., Prihodko, L., Vidale, P.-L., Baker, I. T. and co-authors. 2004. A multiple-scale simulation of variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide using a coupled biosphere-atmospheric model. J. Geophys. Res .-Atmos 109(D18117), doi:10.1029/2003JD004482.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle, S., Davis, K. J., Andrews, A., Gurney, K. R., West, T. and co-authors. 2006. Mid-continent intensive campaign of the North America Carbon Program. Sci. Plan., http://www.nacarbon.org/ nacp/mci.html.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. M., Lawrence, D. M., Challinor, A. J., Slingo, J. M. and Wheeler, T. R. 2007. Development and assessment of a coupled crop-climate model. Global Change Biol. 13,169–183, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01274.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parazoo, N. C., Denning, A. S., Kawa, S. R., Corbin, K. D., Lokupitiya, R. S. and co-authors. 2008. Mechanisms for synoptic variations of atmospheric CO2 in North America, South America, and Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 7239-7254.
   Google Scholar
• Ramankutty, N. and Foley, J. A. 1998. Characterizing patterns of global land use: an analysis of global croplands data. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 12 (4), 667–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, S. J., Miles, N. L., Davis, K. J., Crosson, E., Van Pelt, A. D. and co-authors. 2009. EOS Trans. AGU 90 (52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract B51E-0343.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, S. B., Dobermann, A., Cassman, K. G., Walters, D. T., Knops, J. M. and co-authors. 2005. Annual carbon dioxide exchange in ir-rigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agric. Forest. Met. 131(1-2), 77-96.
   Google Scholar
• Vleeshouwers, L. M. and Verhagen, A. 2002. Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for Europe. Global Change Biol. 8,519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-W., Denning, A. S., Lu, L., Baker, I. T., Corbin, K. D. and co-authors. 2007. Observations and simulations of synoptic, regional, and local variations in atmospheric CO2. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 112(D04108), doi:10.1029/2006JD007410.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, J. F., Zhuang, Q. L., Baldocchi, D. D., Law, B. E., Richardson, A. D. and co-authors. 2008. Estimation of net ecosystem carbon ex-change for the conterminous United States by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data. Agric. Forest Met. 148 (11), 1827-1847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Heinsch, E A., Nemani, R. R. and Running, S. W. 2005. Im-provements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Rem. Sens. Environ. 95, 164–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar