188
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Common ground for behavioural and neuroimaging research

Pages 4-10 | Received 05 Apr 2011, Accepted 01 Nov 2011, Published online: 20 Nov 2020

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J. R. (1992). Automaticity and the ACT* theory. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 165–180.
  • Beck, D. (2010). The appeal of the brain in the popular press. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 762–766.
  • Bogacz, R., & Gurney, K. (2007). The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Computation, 19, 442–477.
  • Brown, S. D., Marley, A., Dodds, P., & Heathcote, A. (2009). Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 583–593.
  • Churchland, A. K., Kiani, R., & Shadlen, M. N. (2008). Decision‐making with multiple alternatives. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 693–702.
  • Cisek, P., Crammond, D. J., & Kalaska, J. F. (2003). Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 922–942.
  • Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2005). Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron, 45, 801–814.
  • Coltheart, M. (2006). What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)? Cortex, 42(3), 323–331.
  • Danker, J., Gunn, P., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2674–2685.
  • Deniau, J., & Chevalier, G. (1985). Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. II. The striato‐nigral influence on thalamocortical cells of the ventromedial thalamic nucleus. Brain Research, 334, 227–233.
  • Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95, 91–101.
  • Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S., Neumann, J., Von cramon, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R. et al. (2008). Striatum and pre‐SMA facilitate decision‐making under time pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 17538–17542.
  • Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E.‐J., Eichele, T., Brown, S., & Serences, J. T. (2011). Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and cognitive models: Opposites attract? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 272–279.
  • Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535–574.
  • Gonsalves, B., & Cohen, N. J. (2010). Brain imaging, cognitive processes, and brain networks. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 744–752.
  • Heeger, D., Huk, A., Geisler, W., & Albrecht, D. (2000). Spikes versus bold: What does neuroimaging tell us about spikes versus bold: What does neuroimaing tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Neuroscience, 3(7), 631–633.
  • Insel, T. (2010). Faulty circuits. Scientific American, 302, 44–51.
  • Lo, C.‐C., & Wang, X.‐J. (2006). Cortico‐basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 956–963.
  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.
  • Mcintosh, A. (2000). Towards a network theory of cognition. Neural Networks, 13, 861–870.
  • Miller, G. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.
  • Mink, J. W. (1996). The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology, 50, 381–425.
  • Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59–63.
  • Qin, Y., Sohn, M.‐H., Anderson, J. R., Stenger, V., Fissell, K., Goode, A. et al. (2003). Predicting the practice effects on the blood oxygenation level‐dependent (bold) function of fMRI in a symbolic manipulation task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(8), 4951–4956.
  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
  • Ratcliff, R., Philiastides, M. G., & Sajda, P. (2009). Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial‐to‐trial variability of the EEG. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 6539–6544.
  • Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two–choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
  • Ratcliff, R., Segraves, M., & Cherian, A. (2003). A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of simple two–choice decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 1392–1407.
  • Rees, G., Friston, K., & Koch, C. (2000). A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque v5. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 716–723.
  • Serences, J. T., & Boynton, G. (2007). Feature‐based attentional modulations in the absence of direct visual stimulation. Neuron, 55(2), 301–312.
  • Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (2001). Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1916–1936.
  • Sirotin, Y., & Das, A. (2009). Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity. Nature, 457, 475–479.
  • Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). The psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 161–168.
  • Sohn, M.‐H., Goode, A., Stenger, V., Carter, C. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2003). Competition and representation during memory retrieval: Roles of the prefrontal cortex and the posterior parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 7412–7417.
  • Stewart, N., & Matthews, W. (2009). Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 594–599.
  • Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice–reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251–260.
  • Teller, D. (1984). Linking propositions. Vision Research, 24(10), 1233–1246.
  • Usher, M., & Mcclelland, J. L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.
  • Van zandt, T., Colonius, H., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 208–256.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.