Transformations in dreaming and characters in the psychoanalytic field

References

• Baranes JJ, Sacco F (2002). Inventer en psychanalyse: construire et interpréter [Invention in psychoanalysis: Construction and interpretation]. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M (1993). The mind of the analyst: From listening to interpretation. Int J Psychoanal 74:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (196162). La situación analítica como campo dinámico [The analytic situation as a dynamic field]. Rev Urug Psicoanál 4:3–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bezoari M, Ferro A (1992). From a play between ‘parts’ to transformations in the couple. Psychoanalysis in a bipersonal field. In: Nissim momigliano L, Robutti A, editors. Shared experience: The psychoanalytic dialogue. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1962). Learning from experience. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1963). Elements of psycho‐analysis. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1965). Transformations. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1970). Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1977). A memoir of the future. Book 3. The dawn of oblivion. Revised and corrected edn. London: Karnac, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1985). The Italian seminars, Bion F, editor, Slotkin P, translator. London: Karnac, 2005. [Seminari italiani. Rome: Borla.]
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1987). Clinical seminars and four papers, Bion F, editor. Abingdon: Fleetwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1992). Cogitations, Bion F, editor. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (2005). The Tavistock seminars, Bion F, editor. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger J (1986). Psicohigiene y psicología institucional [Psychological hygiene and institutional psychology]. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas C (1999). The mystery of things. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolognini S (2002). L’empatia psicoanalitica [Psychoanalytic empathy]. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Bolognini S (2008). Passaggi segreti. Teoria e tecnica della relazione interpsichica [Secret passages. Theory and technique of the interpsychic relationship]. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Botella C, Botella S (2001). The work of psychic figurability, Weller A, translator. Hove: Brunner‐Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer LB (1988). Thinking of the interview as if it were a dream. Contemp Psychoanal 24:275–81.
   Google Scholar
• Cairo I (2007). Review of Seeds of illness, seeds of recovery and Psychoanalysis as therapy and storytelling by A. Ferro. Int J Psychoanal 88:1299–304.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri J, editor (2006). Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chianese D (1997). Constructions and the analytic field: History, scenes and destiny, Harvey I, translator. London: Routledge, 2007. [Costruzione e campo analitico. Storia, scene e destino. Rome: Borla.]
   Google Scholar
• Eco U (1979). The role of the reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP.
   Google Scholar
• Eco U (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP.
   Google Scholar
• Eizirik CL (2005). Analytic listening to traumatic situations. Panel, IPA Congress, Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Faimberg H (1996). Listening to listening. Int J Psychoanal 77:667–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faimberg H (2005). The telescoping of generations. Listening to narcissistic links between generations. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fellini F (2007). The book of dreams. Kezich T, Boarini V, editors. New York, NY: Rizzoli International, 2008 [Il libero dei sogni. Milan: Rizzoli].
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (1992). The bi‐personal field: Experiences in child analysis. London: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (1996). In the analyst’s consulting room, Slotkin P, translator. Hove: Brunner‐Routledge, 2002. [Nella stanza d’analisi. Milan: Cortina.]
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (1999). Psychoanalysis as therapy and storytelling, Slotkin P, translator. Hove: Routledge, 2006. [La psicoanalisi come letteratura e terapia. Milan: Cortina.]
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2002a). Some implications of Bion’s thought: The waking dream and narrative derivatives. Int J Psychoanal 83:597–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2002b). Superego transformations through the analyst’s capacity for reverie. Psychoanal Q 71:477–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2005a). Which reality in the psychoanalytic session? Psychoanal Q 74:421–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2005b). Bion: Theoretical and clinical observations. Int J Psychoanal 86:1535–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2006a). Da una psicoanalisi dei contenuti e delle memorie a una psicoanalisi per gli apparati per sognare, sentire, pensare: transfert, transfer, trasferimenti [From a psychoanalysis of contents and memories to a psychoanalysis for the apparatuses for dreaming, feeling, and thinking: Transference, transfer, and transfers]. Riv Psicoanal 52:401–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2006b). Clinical implications of Bion’s thought. Int J Psychoanal 87:989–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2006c). Mind works. Technique and creativity in psychoanalysis, Slotkin P, translator. Hove: Routledge, 2008. [Tecnica e creatività. Il lavoro analitico. Milan: Cortina.]
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2008a). The patient as the analyst’s best colleague: Transformation into dream and narrative transformation. Italian Psychoanalytical Annual, 199–205. Rome: Borla.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Basile R (2004). The psychoanalyst as individual: Self‐analysis and gradients of functioning. Psychoanal Q 73:659–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Basile R, editors (2009). The analytic field. A clinical concept. Hove: Routledge (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Civitarese G, Collovà M, Foresti G, Mazzacane F, Molinari E, Politi P (2007). Sognare l’analisi. Sviluppi clinici del pensiero di Bion [An oneiric approach to analysis: Clinical developments of Bion’s thought]. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Foresti G (2008). ‘Objects’ and characters in psychoanalytical texts/dialogues. Int Forum Psychoanal 17:71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ferruta A (2005). Aggrapparsi: una struttura elementare per la sopravvivenza psichica [Grasping: An elementary structure for psychic survival]. In: Pensare per Immagini. Rome: Borla.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1899). The interpretation of dreams. SE 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through. SE 12, 145–56.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard G (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground. Int J Psychoanal 76:475–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard G, Lester EP (1995). Boundaries and boundary violations in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard G, Westen D (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal 84:823–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibeault A (1991). Interpretation and transference. Bull Eur Psychoanal Fed 36:47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (1989). De la tiercéité [Thirdness]. In: La pensée clinique [Clinical thought]. Paris: Jacob, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (2005). The illusion of the common ground and mythical pluralism. Int J Psychoanal 86:627–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotstein J (2000). Who is the dreamer who dreams the dream? A study of psychic presences. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grotstein J (2002). ‘We are such stuff as dreams are made of’: Annotations on dreams and dreaming in Bion’s works. In: Neri C, Pines M, Friedman R, editors. Dreams in group psychotherapy: Theory and technique, 110–45. London: Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Grotstein J (2007). A beam of intense darkness. Wilfred Bion’s legacy to psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Guignard F (2004). Préface: Facteurs de maladie, facteurs de guérison (A. Ferro). [Foreword to French edition of Ferro 2002c.] Paris: In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanly C (1990). The concept of truth in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal 71:375–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph B (1985). Transference: The total situation. Int J Psychoanal 66:447–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kancyper L, editor (2002). Volviendo a pensar con Willy y Madeleine Baranger [Thinking again with Willy and Madeleine Baranger]. Buenos Aires: Lumen.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg OF (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique. Int J Psychoanal 74:659–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg OF (2001). Recent developments in the technical approaches of English‐language psychoanalytic schools. Psychoanal Q 70:519–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La farge L (2007). Review of Psychoanalysis as therapy and storytelling by A. Ferro. Psychoanal Q 76:1391–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lewkowicz S, Flechner S, editors (2005). Truth, reality and the psychoanalyst: Latin American contributions to psychoanalysis. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1989). The primitive edge of experience. New York, NY: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2003). On not being able to dream. Int J Psychoanal 84:17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2005). This art of psychoanalysis: Dreaming undreamt dreams and interrupted cries. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’shaughnessy E (2005). Discussion of A Ferro’s paper ‘Bion’s thought’ at ‘Wilfred Bion Today’, International Conference at University College London, 11 June.
   Google Scholar
• Pavell TJ (1976). Possible worlds in literary semantics. J Aesthet Art Critic 34:165–76.
   Google Scholar
• Renik O (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in the light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal Q 65:553–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha Barros E (2000). Affect and pictographic image: The constitution of meaning in mental life. Int J Psychoanal 81:1087–99.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer R (1992). Retelling a life: Narration and dialogue in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith H (1999). Subjectivity and objectivity in analytic listening. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 47:465–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence D (1982). Narrative and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D, Basile R, Birksted‐breen D, Bohm T, Denis P, Ferro A, et al. (2008). Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable: The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein RS (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? Int J Psychoanal 69:5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein RS (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. Int J Psychoanal 71:3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein RS (2005). Will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline? Int J Psychoanal 86:623–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widlöcher D (1996). Les nouvelles cartes de la psychanalyse [Psychoanalysis: New cards, new approaches]. Paris: Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar