Grasping psychoanalysts’ practice in its own merits

References

• Ablon JS, Jones EE (1998). How expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive–behavioral therapy. Psychother Res 8:71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisenstein M (2003). Does the cure come as a byproduct of psychoanalytic treatment? Psychoanal Q 72:263–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi R (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Int J Psychoanal 70:341–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi R (2002). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis: The debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. Int J Psychoanal 83:851–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi R (2003). What kind of evidence makes the analyst change his or her theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 125–36. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi R (2005). What after pluralism? Ulysses still on the road. Psychoanal Inq 25:654–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleger J (1973). Criterios de curación y objetivos del psicoanálisis. Rev Psicoanál APA 30:317–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner C (1982). The mind in conflict. New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri J (1994). Transformations. Int J Psychoanal 75:1079–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canestri J (2006). Psychoanalysis from practice to theory. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri J, Bohleber W, Denis P, Fonagy P (2006). The map of private (implicit, preconscious) theories in clinical practise. In: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory, 29–44. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher U (2000). Foundation for conceptual research in psychoanalysis. (Psychoanalytic Monograph.) London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Etchegoyen H (1986). Los fundamentos de la técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrater mora J (1969). Diccionario de filosofía. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Figuera SA (1994). Toward the dissection of the psychoanalyst’s mind: The psychoanalytic technical superego. In: The analyst’s mind: From listening to interpretation, 31–41. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P (2006). The failure of practice to inform theory and the role of implicit theory in bridging the transmission gap. In: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory, 69–86. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1893f). Charcot. SE 3, 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1927a). Postscript to The question of lay analysis. SE 20, 251–8.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1933a). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE 22, 1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard GO, Westen D (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal 84:823–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfried MR, Raue PJ, Castonguay LG (1998). The therapeutic focus in significant sessions of master therapists: A comparison of cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic–interpersonal interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:803–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson JG, Gabbard GO (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. JAPA 47(3):679–704.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton V (1996). The analyst’s preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez JP (2003). A psychoanalytical phenomenology of perversion. Int J Psychoanal 85:65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez JP (2005). The search for integration or how to work as a pluralist psychoanalyst. Psychoanal Inq 25:602–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez JP (2006). After pluralism: Towards a new, integrated psychoanalytic paradigm. Int J Psychoanal 87:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez JP (2007). Can research influence clinical practice? Int J Psychoanal 88:661–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez JP (2008). Theoretical plurality and pluralism in psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 89:579–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones EE, Pulos SM (1993). Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive–behavioral therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:306–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S (1995). The social construction of validity. Qual Inq 1:19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten P, Blatt SJ, Corveylen J (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. JAPA 54:571–610.
   Google Scholar
• Mendizabal R (1959). Diccionario griego–español ilustrado. Madrid: Razón y Fe.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH (2005). How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work and professional growth. Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• PCSG (1998). Non‐interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. Int J Psychoanal 79:903–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulver SE (1987a). How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Prologue. Psychoanal Inq 7:141–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pulver SE (1987b). How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Epilogue. Psychoanal Inq 7:289–99.
   Google Scholar
• Renik O (2006). Practical psychoanalysis for therapists and patients. New York, NY: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur P (1977). The question of proof in Freud’s psychoanalytic writings. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 25:835–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty R (2000). Pragmatism. Int J Psychoanal 81:819–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler J (1982). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: The training analyst’s dilemma. In: Joseph ED, Wallerstein RS, editors. Psychotherapy. Impact on psychoanalytic training: The influence of practice and theory of psychotherapy on education in psychoanalysis, 39–47. (International Psychoanalytic Association, Monograph 1.) New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler J (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 64:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler J, Dreher AU (1996). What do psychoanalysts want? The problem of aims in psychoanalytic therapy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (2006). Reflections on truth, tradition, and the psychoanalytic tradition of truth. AIM 64:283–92.
   Google Scholar
• Seitz PFD (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In: Gottschalk LA, Auerbach AH, editors. Method of research in psychotherapy, 209–25. New York, NY: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Spence D (1982). Narrative and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stern DN (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Strenger C (1991). Between hermeneutic and sciences: An essay on the epistemology of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International UP. ( Psychological Issues, Monograph 59).
   Google Scholar
• Szecsödy I (1990). The learning process in psychotherapy supervision. Stockholm: Karolinska Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Thomä H, Jiménez JP, Kächele H (2006). Vergleichende Psychoanalyse – textnahe klinische Forschung (Comparative psychoanalysis: Textual clinical research). In: Thomä H, Kächele H, editors. Psychoanalytische therapie. Forschung, 177–98. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomä H, Kächele H (1987). Psychoanalytic practice. 1. Principles. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomä H, Kächele H (2007). On the basis of a new form of treatment report. Psychoanal Inq 27:650–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (1994a). The conceptualization and communication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. Foreword. Int J Psychoanal 75:865–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (1994b). Developing a grounded hypothesis to understand a clinical process: The role of conceptualisation in validation. Int J Psychoanal 75:1159–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2002). The new style conference and devoloping a peer culture in European psychoanalysis. Presidential Address, Prague. EPF Bulletin 56:2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2003). A ten‐year European scientific initiative. Presidential Address, EPF Bulletin 57:2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2006). The search to define and describe how psychoanalysts work: Preliminary report on the project of the EPF Working Party on Comparative Clinical Methods. In: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory, 167–200. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2007). Wie können Fällen in der Psychoanalyse verglichen und diskutiert werden? Implikationen für künftige Standard der klinischen Arbeit [On the problem of comparing and discussing clinical material in psychoanalysis: Implications for future standards of clinical work]. Psyche – Z Psychoanal 61:1042–71.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D, Basile R, Birksted‐breen D, Böhm T, Denis P, Ferro A, Hinz H, Jernstedt A, Mariotti P, Schubert J (2008). Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable: The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wampold BE (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar