The status of developmental curriculum in North American psychoanalysis

References

• Abrams S (1978). The teaching and learning of psychoanalytic developmental psychology. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 26:387–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrams S (1983). Development. Psychoanal Stud Child 38:113–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams S (1999). How child and adult analysis inform and misinform one another. Annu Psychoanal 26:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams S, Solnit AJ (1998). Coordinating developmental and psychoanalytic processes: Conceptualizing technique. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 46:85–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams S, Neubauer PB, Solnit AJ (1999). Coordinating the developmental and psychoanalytic processes: Three case reports. Psychoanal Stud Child 54:87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander F (1934). The influence of psychologic factors upon gastro‐intestinal disturbances: A symposium – I. General principles, objectives, and preliminary results. Psychoanal Q 3:501–39.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony EJ (1961). Panel reports: Learning difficulties in childhood. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 9:124–34.
   Google Scholar
• Auchincloss EL, Michels R (2003). A reassessment of psychoanalytic education: Controversies and changes. Int J Psychoanal 84:387–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auchincloss EL, Vaughan SC (2001). Psychoanalysis and homosexuality: Do we need a new theory? J Am Psychoanal Assoc 49:1157–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum HP (2004). Separation–individuation theory and attachment theory. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 52:535–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinich PM (1980). Some potential effects of adoption on self and object representations. Psychoanal Stud Child 35:107–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgess GA (2005). Intimate uncertainty: Reflections on infant observation in psychoanalytic training. Canadian J Psychoanal 13:273–81.
   Google Scholar
• Busch F (2007). ‘I noticed’: The emergence of self‐observation in relationship to pathological attractor sites. Int J Psychoanal 88:423–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chused JF (2000). Discussion: A clinician’s view of attachment theory. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 48:1175–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates SW (2004). John Bowlby and Margaret S. Mahler: Their lives and theories. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 52:571–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper AM (2005a) Changes in psychoanalytic ideas: Transference interpretation (1985/1987). In: Auchincloss EL, editor. The quiet revolution in American psychoanalysis, 212–26. New York, NY: Brunner Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper AM (2005b) Infant research and adult psychoanalysis (1988/1989). In: Auchincloss EL, editor. The quiet revolution in American psychoanalysis, 95–102. New York, NY: Brunner Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De litvan MA (2007). Infant observation: A range of questions and challenges for contemporary psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal 88:713–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De marneffe D (1997). Bodies and words: A study of young children’s genital and gender knowledge. Gend Psychoanal 2:3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Emde RN (1981). Changing models of infancy and the nature of early development: Remodeling the foundation. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 29:179–219.
   Google Scholar
• Erreich A (2003). A modest proposal: (Re)defining unconscious fantasy. Psychoanal Q 72:541–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajardo B (1998). A new view of developmental research for psychoanalysts. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 46:185–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (1999). Psychoanalysis as therapy and storytelling. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis, vol. 38.)
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P (1996). Commentaries. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 44:404–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P (2008). A genuinely developmental theory of sexual enjoyment and its implications for psychoanalytic technique. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 56:11–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P, Target M (2003). Being mindful of minds: A homage to the contributions of a child‐analytic genius. Psychoanal Stud Child 58:307–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist EL, Target M (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman RC, Downey JI (2008). Sexual differentiation of behavior: The foundation of a developmental model of psychosexuality. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 56:147–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galatzer‐levy RM (2004). Chaotic possibilities: Toward a new model of development. Int J Psychoanal 85:419–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergely G (2007). The social construction of the subjective self: The role of affect mirroring, markedness, and ostensive communication in self‐development. In: Mayes L, Fonagy P, Target M, editors. Developmental science and psychoanalysis: Integration and innovation, 45–82. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Gergely G, Watson JS (1996). The social biofeedback theory of parental affect‐mirroring: The development of emotional self‐awareness and self‐control in infancy. Int J Psychoanal 77:1181–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill HS (1987). Effects of oedipal triumph caused by collapse or death of the rival parent. Int J Psychoanal 68:251–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore K (2005). Play in the psychoanalytic setting: Ego capacity, ego state, and vehicle for intersubjective exchange. Psychoanal Stud Child 60:213–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore K (2008a). Psychoanalytic developmental theory: A contemporary reconsideration. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 56.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore K (2008b). Birth mother, adoptive mother, dying mother, dead mother. In: Jurist E, Slade A, Bergner S, editors. Mind to mind: Infant research, neuroscience, and psychoanalysis, 478–514. New York, NY: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Govrin A (2006). The dilemma of contemporary psychoanalysis: Toward a ‘knowing’ post‐modernism. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 54:507–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grignon M (2003). Infant observation: Its relevance in teaching psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Canadian J Psychoanal 11:421–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann H, Kris E (1945). The genetic approach in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Stud Child 1:11–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog JM (1980). Sleep disturbance and father hunger in 18 to 28 month‐old boys: The Erlkonig syndrome. Psychoanal Stud Child 35:219–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herzog JM (2004). Father hunger and narcissistic deformation. Psychoanal Q 73:893–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravis N (2006). Friedman’s corpus since his Anatomy: A psychoanalytic odyssey. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 54:946–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann FM, Beebe BA (1996). Three principles of salience in the organization of the patient–analyst interaction. Psychoanal Psychol 13:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten P, Blatt SJ, Corveleyn J (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 54:571–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes L (1999). Clocks, engines, and quarks; Love, dreams, and genes: What makes development happen? Psychoanal Stud Child 54:169–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes LC (2001). The twin poles of order and chaos: Development as a dynamic, self‐ordering system. Psychoanal Stud Child 56:137–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes LC, Cohen DJ (1992). The development of a capacity for imagination in early childhood. Psychoanal Stud Child 47:23–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayes L, Fonagy P, Target M (2007). Developmental science and psychoanalysis: Integration and innovation. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Michels R (1999). Psychoanalysts’ theories. In: Fonagy P, Cooper A, Wallerstein R, editors. Psychoanalysis on the move: The work of Joseph Sandler, 187–200. London: Hogarth. (New Library of Psychoanalysis, vol. 35.)
   Google Scholar
• Michels R (2006). Unpublished discussion of Karen Gilmore, ‘Psychoanalytic developmental theory: A contemporary reconsideration’, presented at the Association of Psychoanalytic Medicine Scientific Meeting, 6 June 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SA (1984). Object relations theories and the developmental tilt. Contemp Psychoanal 20:473–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore R (1999). The creation of reality in psychoanalysis: A view of the contributions of Donald Spence, Roy Schafer, Robert Stolorow, Irwin Z. Hoffman, and beyond. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickman SL (1985). Losses in adoption:The need for dialogue. Psychoanal Stud Child 40:365–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick KK, Novick J (1994). Postoedipal transformations: Latency, adolescence, and pathogenesis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 42:143–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olds D (2006). Interdisciplinary studies and our practice. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 54(3):857–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osofsky JD (1996). Commentaries. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 44:422–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine F (1994). Some impressions regrading conflict, defect, and deficit. Psychoanal Stud Child 49:222–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinodoz D (1996). An adopted analysand’s transference of a ‘hole‐object’. Int J Psychoanal 77:323–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblitt DL (1996). States of overstimulation in early childhood. Psychoanal Stud Child 51:542–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandler J, Sandler A‐M, Davies R, Green A (2001). Clinical and observational psychoanalytic research: Roots of a controversy. London: Karnac. (Monograph Series of the Psychoanalysis Unit of University College, London and the Anna Freud Centre, no. 4.)
   Google Scholar
• Sekoff J (1999). The undead: Necromancy and the inner world. In: Kohon F, editor. The dead mother: The work of André Green, 109–27. London: Brunner Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis, vol. 36.)
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro T (1991). Book review: Relationship disturbances in early childhood: The developmental approach, Sameroff AJ, Emde RN, editors (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1989). J Am Psychoanal Assoc 39:277–80.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro T (1993). A view from the bridge. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 41:923–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe SA, Rosenblatt AD (1994). Oedipal sibling triangles. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 42:491–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HF (2000). Towards an international dialogue: North American reflections on the Santiago conference. Int J Psychoanal 81:307–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern DN, Sander LW, Nahum JP, Harrison AM, Lyons‐ruth K, Morgan AC, Bruschweilerstern N, Tronick EZ (1998). Non‐interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. Int J Psychoanal 79:903–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg J (2005). Infant observation at the heart of training. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Strenger C (1991). Between hermeneutics and science: An essay on the epistemology of psychoanalysis. Guilford, CT: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Sugarman A (2003). Dimensions of the child analyst’s role as a developmental object: Affect regulation and limit‐setting. Psychoanal Stud Child 58:189–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman A (2006). Mentalization, insightfulness, and therapeutic action: The importance of mental organization. Int J Psychoanal 87:965–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen E (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanal Dialog 15:255–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson P (1996). Object relations, affect management, and psychic structure formation: The concept of object constancy. Psychoanal Stud Child 51:172–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyson P (1998). Developmental theory and the postmodern psychoanalyst. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 46:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson P (2002). The challenges of psychoanalytic developmental theory. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 50:19–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson P (2005). Affects, agency, and self‐regulation: Complexity theory in the treatment of children with anxiety and disruptive behavior disorders. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 53:159–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell M (2006). Infant observation in Britain: The Tavistock approach. Int J Psychoanal 87:1103–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein JS, Lewis JM (2004). The unexpected legacy of divorce: Report of a 25‐year study. Psychoanal Psychol 21:353–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein JS, Resnikoff D (1997). Parental divorce and developmental progression: An inquiry into their relationship. Int J Psychoanal 78:135–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieder H (1977). On being told of adoption. Psychoanal Q 46:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieder H (1978). On when and whether to disclose about adoption. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 26:793–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff PH (1996). The irrelevance of infant observations for psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 44:369–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar