References
- Bergmann J, Streeck U (2009). The “case” in psychotherapy: Psychodynamic and conversation analytic perspectives. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Psychoanalysis, Hermeneutics and Qualitative Research, 20 May 2009, Magdeburg, Germany.
- Bernardi R (2002). The need of true controversies in psychoanalysis: The debates on Melanie Klein and Jaques Lacan in the Río de la Plata. Int J Psychoanal 83:851–73.
- Bernardi R (2003). What kind of evidence makes the analyst change his or her theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 125–36. London: IPA.
- Blatt SJ (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self‐definition in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Washington, DC: APA.
- Boesky D (2002). Why don’t our institutes teach the methodology of clinical psychoanalytic evidence? Psychoanal Q 71:445–75.
- Canestri J, editor (2006). Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory. Chichester: Wiley.
- Fonagy P (2003). Some complexities in the relationship of psychoanalytic theory to technique. Psychoanal Q 72:13–47.
- Freud S (1900). The interpretation of dreams. SE 4, 5.
- Freud S (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. SE 17, 125–245.
- Freud S (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. SE 17, 3–123.
- Freud S (1925). An autobiographical study. SE 20, 6–74.
- Freud S (1927). Postscript to the question of lay analysis. SE 20, 251–8.
- Freud S (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. SE 23, 211–53.
- Hook S (1959). Psychoanalysis, scientific method and philosophy. New York, NY: International UP.
- Klein GS (1976). Psychoanalytic theory: An exploration of its essentials. New York, NY: International UP.
- Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors (2003). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: IPA.
- Luyten P, Blatt S, Corveleyn J (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 54:571–610.
- Sandler J (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 64:35–45.
- Sandler J, Sandler A‐M, Davies R, editors (2000). Clinical and observational psychoanalytic research: Roots of a controversy. London: Karnac.
- Schachter J, Luborsky L (1998). Who's afraid of psychoanalytic research? Analysts' attitudes towards reading clinical versus empirical research papers. Int J Psychoanal 79:965–9.
- Thomä H, Kächele H (1992). Psychoanalytic practice, vol. 2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Thomä H, Kächele H (2007). Comparative psychoanalysis on the basis of a new form of treatment report. Psychoanal Inq 27:650–89.
- Wallerstein RS (1968). Discussion [of the paper by GL Engel: Some obstacles to the development of research in psychoanalysis]. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 16:215–22.