The use of dreams in the clinical context: Convergencies and divergencies: An Interdisciplinary proposal

References

• Álvarez de toledo L (1954[1996]). The analysis of ‘associating’, ‘interpreting’ and ‘words’. Int J Psychoanal 77:291–317.
   Google Scholar
• Anzieu D (1959). Freud’s self‐analysis, Graham P, translator. Preface by MMR Khan. London: Hogarth and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1986. [(1967). El autoanálisis de Freud y el descubrimiento del psicoanálisis. México: Siglo XXI.]
   Google Scholar
• Anzieu D (1989). The film of the dream. In: Flanders S, editor. The dream discourse today, 137–50. London: Routledge, 2001. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis 17.)
   Google Scholar
• Austin J (1962). How to do things with words. Urmson JO, editor. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M (1993). The mind of the analyst: From listening to interpretation. Int J Psychoanal 74:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger M (2005). Field theory. In: Lewkowicz S, Flechner S, editors. Truth, reality and the psychoanalyst: Latin American contributions to psychoanalysis, 97–124. London: IPL.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger W, Baranger M (196162). La situación analítica como campo dinámico [The analytic situation as a dynamic field]. Rev Urug Psicoanál 4:3–54.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger W, Baranger M (1962). Problemas del campo psicoanalítico [Problems in the psychoanalytic field]. Buenos Aires: Kargieman, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W, Mom J (1988). The infantile psychic trauma from us to Freud: Pure trauma, retroactivity and reconstruction. Int J Psychoanal 69:113–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger W, Godstein N, Goldstein R (1994). Proceso en espiral y campo dinámico [Spiral process and dynamic field]. In: Artesanías psicoanalíticas [Psychoanalytic crafts], 349–70. Buenos Aires: Kargieman.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1962). Learning from experience. London: Karnac, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Blum H (1976). The changing use of dreams in psychoanalytic practice: Dreams and free association. Int J Psychoanal 57:315–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botella C, Botella S (1997). Más allá de la representación [Beyond representation]. Valencia: Promolibro.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner Ch (1969). Dreams in clinical psychoanalytic practice. In: The dream discourse today, op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Deledalle G (2000). Charles S. Peirce’s philosophy of signs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida J (1976[1967]). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD, London: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Eisele C, editor (1976). Letter from Charles S. Peirce to Philip E. B. Jourdain, 5 December 1908. In: The new elements of mathematics. Vol. 3, Part 2. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson E (1954 [1992]). The dream specimen of psychoanalysis. In: Lansky M, editor. Essential papers on dreams, 137–79. New York, NY: New York UP, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fain M, David C (1963). Aspects fonctionnels de la vie onirique [Functional aspects of oneiric life]. Rev Fr Psychanal 27:241–343.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P (2000). Dreams of borderline patients. In: Dreaming and thinking, 91–108. London: Karnac, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester J (1990). The seductions of psychoanalysis: Freud, Lacan and Derrida. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. [(1995). Seducciones del psicoanálisis: Freud, Lacan y Derrida. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.]
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1895[1950]). Project for a scientific psychology. Part I: 19, 20. SE 1, 283–397.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1896[1950]). Letter 52. SE 1:233–9.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1900). The interpretation of dreams. SE 4, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1911). The handling of dream interpretation in psychoanalysis. SE 12:89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1913). The claims of psychoanalysis to the interest of the non‐psychological sciences. Part II. The philological interest of psychoanalysis. SE 13:176–8.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1914). On the history of the psychoanalytic movement. SE 14:7–66.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1915). The unconscious. SE 14:166–208.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (19161917). Introductory lectures in psychoanalysis, lecture X, 149–69.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. SE 18, 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1923). Remarks on the theory and practice of dream interpretation. SE 19:107–22.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. SE 22, 7–184.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1940). An outline of psychoanalysis. SE 23, 144–208.
   Google Scholar
• Frosch J (1967). Severe regressive states during analysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 15:491–507, 606–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green A (1977). The borderline concept. In: On private madness. London: Hogarth, 1986. [(1990). El concepto de fronterizo. In: De locuras privadas, 88–199. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.]
   Google Scholar
• Green A (1990). La nueva clínica psicoanalítica y la teoría de Freud [New psychoanalytic practice and Freud’s theory]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Greenson R (1970). The exceptional position of the dream in psychoanalytic practice. Psychoanal Q 39:519–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice HP (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence‐meaning, and word‐meaning. In: Foundations of language 4, 1–18. [(1994). Quoted in: Levinson S. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.]
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg L, et al. (1967). Función del soñar y clasificación de los sueños en el proceso analítico [The role of dreaming and the classification of dreams in the analytic process]. Rev Psicoanál 24:749–68.
   Google Scholar
• Grinstein A (1968). Sigmund Freud’s dreams. Detroit, MI: Wayne State UP. [(1981). Los sueños de Sigmund Freud. Mexico: Siglo XXI.]
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne C, Weiss P, editors (193135). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2, 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Hjemslev L (1961). Prolegomena to a theory of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph B (1975). The patient who is difficult to reach. In: Giovacchini P, editor. Tactics and techniques in psycho‐analytic therapy, vol. 2, 205–16. New York, NY: Aronson. [(1977). El paciente de difícil acceso. In: Grinberg L, editor. Prácticas psicoanalíticas comparadas en las neurosis. Buenos Aires: Paidós.]
   Google Scholar
• Kanzer M (1955). The communicative function of the dream. Int J Psychoanal 36:260–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M (1962). Dream psychology and the evolution of the psychoanalytic situation. In: Flanders S, editor. The Dream Discourse Today, 29–46. London: Routledge. ( The New Library of Psychoanalysis ).
   Google Scholar
• Khan M (1974). The privacy of the self (Chapters 2, 21). London: Hogarth, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In: Envy and gratitude and other works. London: Hogarth, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan J (1973). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J, Pontalis J‐B (1980). The language of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Mack J (1970). Nightmares and human conflict. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. [Quoted in Blum, op. cit.]
   Google Scholar
• Mahony P (1987). Towards a formalist approach to Freud’s central dream: Psychoanalysis and discourse. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Marafioti R (2005). Charles S. Peirce: El éxtasis de los signos [ Charles S. Peirce: The ecstasy of signs ]. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
   Google Scholar
• Marty P (1984). Los sueños en los enfermos somáticos [Dreams in somatic patients]. In: Pierre Marty y la psicosomática [Pierre Marty and psychosomatics], 79–99. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Marty P (1990). La psicosomática del adulto [ Adult psychosomatics ]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Marty P, De m’uzan M (1983). El pensamiento operatorio [Operational thinking]. Rev Psicoanál APA 40:711–21.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer D (1984). Dream‐life. Strath Tay: Clunie. (The Roland Harris Trust Library.)
   Google Scholar
• Moorjani A (2000). Peirce and psychopragmatics: Semiosis and performativity. In: Muller J, Brent J, editors. Peirce, semiotics and psychoanalysis. London, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Parker K (1998). The continuity of Peirce’s thought. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt UP.
   Google Scholar
• Parret H (1983). Semiotics and pragmatics: An evaluative comparison of conceptual frameworks. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (186793). The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1. Houser N, Kloesel C, editors, 1992. vol. 2 (1893–1913). Peirce Edition Project, editor. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Samaja J (2003). Los límites de la estática del signo. La semiótica y su aplicación a la investigación de la subjetividad [Boundaries of the sign’s statics: Semiotics and its application to research on subjectivity]. Presented at a graduate seminar, Buenos Aires University School of Psychology. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Sami ali M (1974). El espacio imaginario [ Imaginary space ]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• De saussure F (1966). Course in general linguistics. Bally C, Sechehaye A, Riedlinger A, editors. Baskin W, translator. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill. [(1969). Curso de lingüística general. Buenos Aires: Losada.]
   Google Scholar
• Searle J (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1980). The function of dreams. In: Flanders S, editor. The dream discourse today, 100–7. London: Routledge, 2001. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis 17.)
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1997). An interview with H. Segal. In: Pick D, Roper L, editors. Dreams and history, 237–46. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe FE (1937). Dream analysis. London: Hogarth.[(1961). El análisis de los sueños. Buenos Aires: Hormé.]
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur fischbein S (1996). Psicoanálisis y lingüística. Contactos e intercambios [Psychoanalysis and linguistics: Contacts and exchanges]. Lo femenino [The feminine]. Rev Psicoanál APA 8:537–70.
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur fischbein S (2003). Algunas reflexiones sobre el lugar del lenguaje y la expresión de los afectos [Some thoughts on the role of language and the expression of affects]. In: Cachay rodríguez J, editor. El triángulo de la comunicación: Cuerpo, afecto, lenguaje [The triangle of communication: Body, affect, language], 199–227. Lima: Centro de Psicoterapia Psicoanalítica de Lima.
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur fischbein S (2005a). Oneiric activity and analytical process. Int J Psychoanal 86:1329–51.
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur fischbein S (2005b). Psychoanalysis and linguistics: Is dialogue possible? In: Lewkowicz S, Flechner S, editors. Truth, reality and the psychoanalyst: Latin American contributions to psychoanalysis, 97–124. London: IPL.
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur fischbein S (2007). A plea for interdisciplinary conceptual and clinical research into dream narratives. In: Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Canestri J, Target M, editors. Frühe Entwicklung und ihre Störungen 252–4. Klinische, konzeptuelle und empirische Forschung. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur fischbein S (2009). El uso de los sueños en el contexto clínico. Convergencias y divergencias. Una propuesta interdisciplinaria [The use of dreams in the clinical context. Convergences and divergencies: An interdisciplinary proposal]. Rev Psicoanál APA 66:137–59.
   Google Scholar
• Waldhorn H (1967). The place of the dream in clinical psychoanalysis. In: Fine B, Joseph E, Waldhorn H, editors. Indications for Psychoanalysis, Kris Study Group Monograph 2, 22–106. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar