A literature‐driven English Programme’s effectiveness in improving the writing skills of Grade 7 Singaporean students

References

• Asimov, I. (2004 edn.) I, Robot. New York: Bantam Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Translated from Russian by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G. (1998) ‘Grammar without shame’, The Use of English, 49 (2) 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, R.. English composition’, in R. Ebel (ed.) (1969). Encyclopedia of Educational Research. 4th edn. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Census of Population Office (2000) Literacy and language. Singapore: Singapore-Department of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. and Jacobs, V. A. (1983) ‘Writing and reading in the elementary grades: Developmental trends among low SES children’, Language Arts, 60 (5) 617–626.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. A. (1992) ‘Gender differences in aptitude and achievement test scores’, in Sex Equity in Educational Opportunity, Achievement and Testing: Proceedings of the 1991 ETS Invitational Conference. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Daiker, D. A., Kerek, A. and Morenberg, M. (1990). The Writer’s Options: Combining to Composing. 4th edn. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Darling‐hammond, L. (2000) ‘Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence’, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (1) 2–50.
   Google Scholar
• De ford, D. E. (1981) ‘Literacy: Reading, writing, and other essentials’, Language Arts, 58 (6) 652–658.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell, W. B. Ethical consideration in research’ in J. P. Keeves (ed.) (1990). Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, J., Strickland, D. and Wepner, S. (1992). Process Reading and Writing: A Literature‐Based Approach. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, L. R. (1992). ‘Literature‐based reading instruction: An analysis’, Reading Research and Instruction, 31 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Godley, A. (2004). ‘Commentary: Applying “Dialogic Origin and Dialogic Pedagogy of Grammar” to current research on literacy and grammar instruction’, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42 (6) 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, J. A. (2003). ‘Revitalizing grammar: Balancing content and form in the writing workshop’, English Journal, 92 (3) 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, J. A. and Wininger, M. (1999). ‘An ideological approach to grammar pedagogy, English education courses’, English Education, 31 (4) 265–294.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, T. (2001). Boy Oh Boy: How to Raise and Educate Boys. New South Wales: Pearson Education Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. (1999). Understanding the Boys: Issues of Behaviour & Achievement. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honigsfeld, A. M. and Dunn, R. (2003). ‘High school male and female learning‐style similarities and differences in diverse nations’, The Journal of Educational Research, 96 (4) 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivie, S. D. (2001). ‘Metaphor: A model for teaching critical thinking’, Contemporary Education, 72 (1) 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge, F. (1990). A comparison of learning style preferences between seventh‐ and eighth‐grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Loma Linda University.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, J. (1997) ‘Grammar, metalanguage and writing development’, Teacher Development, 1 (3) 431–445.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. and Flihan, S. (2000). Writing and Reading Relationships: Constructive Tasks. Available at http://cela.albany.edu/publication/article/writeread.htm. Accessed 23 February 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. (1978). Little Ironies ‐ Stories of Singapore. Singapore: Heinemann Southeast Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, L. (1979). ‘Learning style and ability grouping among seventh grade students’, The Clearing House, 52 377–380.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, R. (2001). ‘Editorial’, English in Education, 35 (1) 3.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools, & Equal Opportunities Commission. (1996). The Gender Divide: Performance Differences between Boys and Girls at School. London: Office for Standards in Education and the Equal Opportunities Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, C. H. (1977). Foundations for a Theory of Instruction and Educational Psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M.D. (2006). The effectiveness of a literature‐driven English language programme in improving the English language skills of secondary one students in Singapore. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Notre Dame Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Qualification and Curriculum Authority. (1998). The Grammar Papers. London: Qualification and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2002). Introducing N6: A Workshop Handbook. Melbourne: QSR International Pte. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, J. What do we mean about knowledge about language?‘ in R. Carter (ed.) (1990). Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W. and Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, G. (2001) ‘Religion, politics, and the fear of whole language education’, The Humanist, 61 (5) 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Shofield, J. W. Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research’, In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley and P. Foster (eds.) (2000). Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1983) ‘Reading like a writer’, Language Arts, 60 (5) 558–567.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, M. and Lehman, B. (1995). Teaching with Children’s Books: Paths to Literature‐Based Instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. The case study method in social inquiry’, in R. Gomm, M. Hammersley and P. Foster (eds) (2000). Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stotsky, S. (1983) ‘Research on reading/writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions’, Language Arts, 60 (5) 627–642.
   Google Scholar
• Tchudi, S. Teaching of English Education’, in J. W. Guthrie (ed.) (2003). Encyclopedia of Education. 2nd edn., vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. and Birmingham, P. (2003). Using Research Instruments: A Guide for Researchers. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C. (1983). ‘Writing and the teaching of reading’, Language Arts, 60 (5) 600–606.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K., Lam, R. Y. and Ho, L. (2002). ‘The effects of schooling on gender differences’, British Educational Research Journal, 28 (6) 827–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd edn., vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, F. L. and Mcintyre, J. S. (1992). ‘A comparative study of the learning style preferences of students with learning disabilities and students who are gifted’, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25 (2) 124–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar