Biodiversity and Land‐Use Change in the American Mountain West

References

• Alexander, B., and L. Propst. 2002. Saving the Family Ranch: New Directions. In Ranching West of the 100th Meridian: Culture, Ecology, and Economics, edited by R. L. Knight, W. C. Gilgert, and E. Marston, 203–217. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, W. B., H. A. Whitlaw, S. J. Young, R. A. Jenkins, and G. J. Forbes. 1999. Predation and Survival of White‐Tailed Deer Fawns in Northcentral New Brunswick. Journal of Wildlife Management 63 (2): 574–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beissinger, S. R., and D. R. Osborne. 1982. Effects of Urbanization on Avian Community Organization. Condor 84 (1): 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R. B. 1996. Land Use and Avian Species Diversity along an Urban Gradient. Ecological Applications 6 (2): 506–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, C. E., J. H. Bock, and B. C. Bennett. 1999. Songbird Abundance in Grasslands at a Suburban Interface on the Colorado High Plains. Studies in Avian Biology 19: 131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Buechner, M., and R. Sauvajot. 1996. Conservation and Zones of Human Activity: The Spread of Human Disturbance across a Protected Landscape. In Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice, edited by R. C. Szaro and D. W. Johnston, 605–629. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher, P. B., and J. H. Lawton. 1987. Predation by Domestic Cats in an English Village. Journal of Zoology [London] 212: 439–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, K. R., and M. E. Soulé. 1999. Mesopredator Release and Avifaunal Extinctions in a Fragmented System. Nature 400 (6744): 563–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech, B., P. R. Krausman, and P. K. Devers. 2000. Exonomic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States. BioScience 50 (7): 593–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, V. H., S. Brown, R. A. Haeuber, N. T. Hobbs, N. Huntly, R. J. Naiman, W. E. Riebsame, M. G. Turner, and T. J. Valone. 2000. Ecological Principles and Guidelines for Managing the Use of Land. Ecological Applications 10 (3): 639–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, D. L. 1999. The Western Range Revisited: Removing Livestock from Public Lands to Conserve Native Biodiversity. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, T. M., and F. R. Thompson III. 2001. Modeling the Ecological Trap Hypothesis: A Habitat and Demographic Analysis for Migrant Songbirds. Ecological Applications 11 (3): 871–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerksen, C. J., N. T. Hobbs, D. L. Elliot, E. Johnson, and J. R. Miller. 2000. Managing Development for People and Wildlife: A Handbook for Habitat Protection by Local Governments. [http:ndis.nrel.colostate.eduescophandbookintro.html].
   Google Scholar
• Emlen, J. T. 1974. An Urban Bird Community in Tucson, Arizona: Derivation, Structure, Regulation. Condor 76 (2): 184–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, T. M., and C. W. Sexton. 1994. Negative Correlation of Blue Jays and Golden‐Cheeked Warblers near an Urbanizing Area. Conservation Biology 8(1): 286–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischner, T. L. 1994. Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America. Conservation Biology 8 (3): 629–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GCOFR [Governor's Commission on Saving Open Spaces, Farms, and Ranches]. 2000. Natural Landscapes: Colorado's Legacy to Its Children. December. [http:www.state.co.usissuesopen_space8.pdf].
   Google Scholar
• Germaine, S. S., S. S. Rosenstock, R. E. Schweinsburg, and W. S. Richardson. 1998. Relationships among Breeding Birds, Habitat, and Residential Development in Greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecological Applications 8 (3): 680–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. L. 1997. A Comparison of Gray Fox Ecology between Residential and Undeveloped Rural Landscapes. Journal of Wildlife Management 61 (1): 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. L. 1998. Bobcats in Residential Areas: Distribution and Homeowner Attitudes. Southwestern Naturalist 43 (4): 469–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. C. 1998. Impact of a Subsidized Exotic Predator on Native Biota: Effect of House Cats (Felis catus) on California Birds and Rodents. Ph.D. diss., Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Heimlich, R. E., and W. D. Anderson. 2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. L. 1999. Private Lands: The Neglected Geography. Conservation Biology 13 (2): 223–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, R. L. 2002. The Ecology of Ranching. In Ranching West of the moth Meridian: Culture, Ecology, and Economics, edited by R. L. Knight, W. C. Gilgert, and E. Marston, 123–144. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. L., and T. W. Clark. 1998. Boundaries between Public and Private Lands: Defining Obstacles, Finding Solutions. In Stewardship across Boundaries, edited by R. L. Knight and P. B. Landres, 175–191. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. L., J. Mitchell, E. Odell, and J. Maestas. Forthcoming. Subdividing the West. In Principles of Conservation Biology, edited by M. Groom, G. K. Meffe, and C. R. Carroll. 3d ed. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Linhart, S. B., and F. F. Knowlton. 1975. Determining the Relative Abundance of Coyotes by Scent Station Lines. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3 (3): 119–124.
   Google Scholar
• LTA [Land Trust Alliance]. 2001. Summary Data from the National Land Trust Census. 12 September. [http:www.lta.orgnewsroomcensus_summary_data.htm].
   Google Scholar
• Marzluff, J. M., F. R. Gehlbach, and D. A. Manuwal. 1998. Urban Environments: Influences on Avifauna and Challenges for the Avian Conservationist. In Avian Conservation: Research and Management, edited by J. M. Marzluff and R. Sallabanks, 283–299. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masnick, G. 2001. America's Shifting Population: Understanding Migration Patterns in the West. Changing Landscapes 2 (2): 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, R. A., and R. L. Sheley. 2001. Principles and Practices for Managing Rangeland Invasive Plants. Journal of Range Management 54 (5): 502–517.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. G., R. L. Knight, and C. K. Miller. 2001. Wildlife Responses to Pedestrians and Dogs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29 (1): 124–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, S. G., J. B. Dunning Jr., and J. M. Bates. 1989. Effects of Urbanization on Breeding Bird Community Structure in Southwestern Desert Habitats. Condor 91 (2): 416–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, D. C. 1980. Soil Survey of Larimer County Area, Colorado, GPO 239–812/48. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., and K. J. Dueker. 1990. The Exurbanization of America and Its Planning Policy Implications. Journal of Planning and Education Research 9(2): 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Obermann, B., D. Carlson, and J. Batchelder, eds. 2000. Tracking Agricultural Land Conversion in Colorado. Colorado Department of Agriculture. September. [http:www.ag.state.co.usresourceAgriculturalLandConversion.html].
   Google Scholar
• Odell, E. A., and R. L. Knight. 2001. Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado. Conservation Biology 15 (4): 1143–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, T. M. 1996. Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulliam, H. R. 1996. Sources and Sinks: Empirical Evidence and Population Consequences. In Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time, edited by O. E. Rhodes Jr., R. K. Chesser, and M. H. Smith, 45–69. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riebsame, W. E., H. Gosnell, and D. M. Theobald. 1996. Land Use and Landscape Change in the Colorado Mountains, I: Theory, Scale, and Pattern. Mountain Research and Development 16 (4): 395–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romme, W. H. 1997. Creating Pseudo‐Rural Landscapes in the Mountain West. In Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology, edited by J. I. Nassauer, 139–161. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotenberry, J. T. 1998. Avian Conservation Research Needs in Western Shrublands: Exotic Invaders and the Alteration of Ecosystem Processes. In Avian Conservation: Research and Management, edited by J. M. Marzluff and R. Sallabanks, 261–272. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 8.0. 3 vols. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. M., F. W. Davis, R. G. Mcghie, R. G. Wright, C. Groves, and J. Estes. 2001. Nature Reserves: Do They Capture the Full Range of America's Biological Diversity Ecological Applications 11 (4): 999–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullins, M. J., D. T. Theobald, J. R. Jones, and L. M. Burgess. 2002. Lay of the Land: Ranch Land and Ranching. In Ranching West of the 100th Meridian: Culture, Ecology, and Economics, edited by R. L. Knight, W. C. Gilgert, and E. Marston, 25–31. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. 2001. The West's Forest Lands: Magnets for New Migrants and Part‐Time Residents. Changing Landscape 2 (2): 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D. M. 2000. Fragmentation by Inholdings and Exurban Development. In Forest Fragmentation in the Southern Rocky Mountains, edited by R. L. Knight, F. H. Smith, S. W. Buskirk, W. H. Romme, and W. L. Baker, 155–174. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D. M., J. R. Miller, and N. T. Hobbs. 1997. Estimating the Cumulative Effects of Development on Wildlife Habitat. Landscape and Urban Planning 39 (1): 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., J. L. Laake, J. F. Derry, S. T. Buckland, D. L. Borchers, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, S. Strindberg, S. L. Hedley, M. L. Burt, F. Marques, J. H. Pollard, and R. M. Fewster. 1998. DISTANCE 3.5. St. Andrews, Scotland: University of St. Andrews, Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. J. 1996. Winter Foraging Response of Elk to Spotted Knapweed Removal. Northwest Science 70 (1): 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trammell, M. A., and J. L. Butler. 1995. Effects of Exotic Plants on Native Ungulate Use of Habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59 (4): 808–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Resident Population. 15 March. [http:blue.census.govpopulationwwwcen2000respop.html].
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, W. O. 1989. Response of Deer to Density and Distribution of Housing in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17 (4): 406–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, W. W. 2002. Cloudy Sky over the Range: Whose Home and Why It Matters. In Ranching West of the 100th Meridian: Culture, Ecology, and Economics, edited by R. L. Knight, W. C. Gilgert, and E. Marston, 219–231. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzel, N. H. 1988. Nest‐Site Competition between the European Starling and Native Breeding Birds in Northwestern Nevada. Condor 90 (2): 515–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuerthner, G. 1994. Subdivisions versus Agriculture. Conservation Biology 8 (3): 905–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar