(Anti)Social Capital in the Production of an (UN)Civil Society in PakistanFootnote^*

* The article benefited from reviews by Chris Meindle, Sharon Lash, and two anonymous reviewers. I thank Dona Stewart for her assistance through the review process.

References

• Abbas, H. 2005. Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, the Army, and America's War on Terror. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J. 1997. Social Capital in Waste—A Solid Investment Journal of International Development 9 (7): 951–961.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. 1997. Social Capital and Rural Intensification: Local Organizations and Islands of Sustainability in the Rural Andes. Geographical Journal 163 (2): 189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., and T. Perreault. 1999. Social Capital, Development, and Access to Resources in Highland Ecuador. Economic Geography 75 (4): 395–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., J. Quisbert, and G. Trujillo. 1996. Technology and Rural Development Strategies in a Small Farmer Organization: Lessons from Bolivia for Rural Policy and Practice. Public and Development 16 (3): 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 1997. Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49 (3): 401–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, J. A., and P. B. Richard. 1998. Civil Society and Political Context in Central America. American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, J. 1998. Social Capital and Sustainability of NGO Intermediated Development Projects in Bangladesh. Community Development Journal 33 (3): 236–248.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., and B. Braun, eds. 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. P. 1998. The Pakistan Army: With a New Foreword and Epilogue. Karachi: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (suppl.): S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, M., ed. 1995. Terrorism in Context. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daechsel, M. 1997. Military Islamization in Pakistan and the Specter of Colonial Perceptions. Contemporary South Asia 6 (2): 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Dawn 2005. Electronic Media Urged to Promote Patriotism. Dawn, 6 May. [www.dawn.com20050506nat8.htm].
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. 1999. NGO Performance—What Breeds Success? New Evidence From South Asia. World Development 27 (2): 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., and D. Hulme. 1996. Too Close for Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Nongovernmental Organizations. World Development 24 (6): 961–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1996. Constructing Nature: Elements for a Post‐Structural Political Ecology. In Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, edited by R. Peet and M. Watts, 46–68. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A., and S. E. Alvarez. 1992. The Making of Social Movements in Latin America. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 1996. Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy. World Development 24 (6): 1119–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, J., and A. Bebbington. 1993. Reluctant Partners? Non‐Governmental Organizations, the State and Sustainable Agricultural Development. With K. Wellard and D. Lewis London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. 1999. The Development State Is Dead—Long Live Social Capital Development and Change 30 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B. 2002. They Fk You up Those Social Capitalists. Antipode 34 (4): 796–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M. W., and B. Edwards. 1999. Is It Time to Disinvest in Social Capital Journal of Public Policy 19 (2): 141–173.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1996. How Does Civil Society Thicken? The Political Construction of Social Capital in Rural Mexico. World Development 24 (6): 1089–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2001. Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third World Quarterly 22 (1): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafoor, A. 1987. A Social Engineering Experiment in Pakistan: A Study of Orangi. Regional Development Dialogue 8 (2): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• GOP [Government of Pakistan]. 1993. National Environmental Action Plan: The Pakistan National Conservation Strategy. Karachi: Government of Pakistan, Environment and Urban Affairs Division.
   Google Scholar
• Groenfeldt, D., and M. Svendsen, eds. 2000. Case Studies in Participatory Irrigation Management. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., and P. Renzio. 1997. “Missing Link” or Analytically Missing? The Concept of Social Capital. Journal of International Development 9 (7): 919–937.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, P. 1996. Social Capital as a Product of Class Mobilization and State Intervention: Industrial Workers in Kerala, India. World Development 24 (6): 1055–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, K. 1987. The Social Space of Terror: Towards a Civil Interpretation of Total War. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 5 (4): 445–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, K. 2001. Between Pinochet and Kropotkin: State Terror, Human Rights and the Geographers. Canadian Geographer 45 (3): 338–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. 1998. Inside Terrorism. New York, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HRCP [Human Rights Commission of Pakistan]. 2003. Council Statement 2003. Lahore: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. [www.hrcp‐web.orgcouncil_statement.cfm].
   Google Scholar
• HRCP [Human Rights Commission of Pakistan]. 2004a. Council Statement 2004. Lahore: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. [www.hrcp‐web.orgcouncil_statement_octo4.cfm].
   Google Scholar
• HRCP [Human Rights Commission of Pakistan]. 2004b. State of Human Rights in 2004. Lahore: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. [www.hrcp‐web.orgar_home_2004.cfm].
   Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, S. 1998. Imagining an Alternative Politics of Knowledge: Subverting the Hegemony of International Relations Theory in Pakistan. Contemporary South Asia 7 (1): 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• ICG [International Crisis Group]. 2005. The State of Sectarianism in Pakistan. Asia Report 95. Brussels: International Crisis Group [www.crisisgroup.orghomeindex.cfm ?id=3575l=1].
   Google Scholar
• Jehangir, A. 2005. Telephone interview with the author. 12 February.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., and G. Wilson. 2000. Biting the Bullet: Civil Society, Social Learning and the Transformation of Local Governance. World Development 28 (11): 1891–1906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H. 1987. Bureaucracy in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, T. A. 2000. Economy, Society and the State in Pakistan. Contemporary South Asia 9 (2): 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. F. 1995. Institutional Design of Public Agencies and Coproduction: A Study of Irrigation Associations in Taiwan. World Development 24 (6): 1039–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. 1996. Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work. Politics and Society 24 (1): 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, I. H. 1997. State and Civil Society in Pakistan: Politics of Authority, Ideology, and Ethnicity. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdudi, S. A. 1970. The Process of Islamic Revolution. Lahore: Islamic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdudi, S. A. 1984. The Islamic Movement: Dynamics of Values, Power and Change. edited by K. Murad. Leicester, England: Islamic Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mcllwaine, C. 1998. Civil Society and Development Geography. Progress in Human Geography 22 (3): 415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghissi, H. 2001. Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, G., and J. Mohan. 2002. Placing Social Capital. Progress in Human Geography 26 (2): 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moten, A. R. 2003. Revolution to Revolution: Jama'at‐e‐Islami in the Politics of Pakistan. Karachi: Royal Book Co..
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, D. 2004. Pakistan and the September 11th Terrorist Attacks: Back from the Brink? In The Unfolding Legacy of 9/11, edited by J. Harf and M. O. Lombardi, 168–184. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, D. 2005. The Terrible Geographicalness of Terrorism: Reflections of a Hazards Geographer. Antipode 35 (1): 72–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, D., and V. Murthy. 2000. “Faces of the Beloved”: Rerouting the Tragic History of the Kashmir Issue. In Handcuffed to History: Narratives, Pathologies and Violence in South Asia, edited by S. P. Udayakumar, 99–126. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, D. 1999. Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty. Policy Research Working Paper 2167. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, Poverty Division.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr, S. V. R. 1994. The Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution: The Jama'at‐i‐Islami of Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr, S. V. R. 1996. Mawdudi and the Making of Islamic Revivalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr, S. V. R. 2000. International Relations of an Islamist Movement: The Case of the Jama'at‐i‐Islami of Pakistan. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. [www.cfr.orgcontentpublicationsattachmentsNasr.pdf].
   Google Scholar
• Nizamani, H. K. 1998. Limits of Dissent: A Comparative Study of Dissident Voices in the Nuclear Discourse of Pakistan and India. Contemporary South Asia 7 (3): 317–337.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, R. 1999. Theories of Development. With E. Hartwick New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., and M. Watts, eds. 1996. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., and M. Watts, eds. 2004. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Platteau, J.‐P. 1994. Behind the Market Stage Where Real Societies Exist—Part I: the Role of Public and Private Order Institutions. Journal of Development Studies 30 (3): 533–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and P. Landolt. 2000. Social Capital: Promise and Pitfalls of Its Role in Development. Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (1): 529–547.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, P. W. 1996. Development Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., and H. Ward. 2001 Social Capital and the Environment. World Development 29 (2): 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putzel, J. 1997. Accounting for the “Dark Side” of Social Capital: Reading Robert Putnam on Democracy. Journal of International Development 9 (7): 939–949.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. 2004. Geography of Development: Development, Civil Society and Inequality—Social Capital Is (Almost) Dead Progress in Human Geography 28 (4): 517–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, I. A. 2005. Telephone interview with the author. 8 February.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, M. A. 2004. A to Z of Jehadi Organizations in Pakistan. Translated by S. Ansari Lahore: Mashal Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. 2000. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil, and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey‐vance, M. 1996. Social Capital, Sustainability, and Working Democracy: New Yardsticks for Grassroots Development. Grassroots Development 20 (1): 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera‐cusicanqui, S. 1990. Liberal Democracy and Ayllu Democracy: The Case of Northern Potosi, Bolivia. Journal of Development Studies 26 (4): 97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, M. 1997. Perverse Social Capital—Some Evidence from Colombia. Journal of Economic Issues 31 (3): 805–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, F. J., ed. 1993. Beyond the Impasse: New Directions in Development Theory. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Serageldin, I., and A. Steer. 1994. Epilogue: Expanding the Capital Stock. In Making Development Sustainable: From Concepts to Action, edited by I. Serageldin and A. Steer, 95–122. Melbourne, Australia: World Bank Environment.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP [United Nations Development Programme]. 2000. UNDP Human Development Report 2000: Human Rights and Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press. [http:hdr.undp.orgreportsglobal2000en].
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, S. G. 1995. The Business of Grassroots Development. Grassroots Development 19 (2): 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Whaites, A. 1995. The State and Civil Society in Pakistan. Contemporary South Asia 4 (4): 229–254.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1997. Draft Report of the Social Capital Satellite Group, ENVDR. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, M. Q. 1998. Sectarianism in Pakistan: The Radicalization of Shi'i and Sunni Identities. Modern Asian Studies 32 (3): 689–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar