Proprietary Residential Communities in the United States

References

• ACIR [Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations]. 1989. Residential Community Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System? Washington, D.C.: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
   Google Scholar
• American Housing Survey. 2002. HUD User Policy Development and Related Information Services Washington D.C. [http://www.huduser.orgDatasetsahsahsdatao1.html].
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., D. B. Massey, and N. J. Thrift. 2000. Cities for the Many, Not the Few. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, S., and C. Silverman. 1989. The Political Life of Mandatory Homeowners Associations. In Residential Community Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System?, edited by United States Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, 31–37. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Beito, D., P. Gordon, and A. Tabarrok. 2002. The Voluntary City: Choice, Community, and Civil Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1998a. Civil Society versus Civic Virtue. In Freedom of Association, edited by A. Gutmann, 239–272. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1998b. Residential Community Associations: Community or Disunity? In The Essential Communitarian Reader, edited by A. Etzioni, 167–176. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., and M. G. Snyder. 1999. Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bollens, J., and H. Schmandt. 1982. The Metropolis: Its People, Politics and Economic Life. 4th ed. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. 1965. An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica, n.s., 32 (125): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, T. 2000. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sāo Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S. 1994. The Fortress City: Privatised Spaces. Consumer Citizenship. In Post‐Fordism: A Reader, edited by A. Amin, 409–427. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, I. 2004. Design out Crime. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Community Associations Institute. 2004. Industry Data. [http://www.caionline.orgaboutfacts.cfm].
   Google Scholar
• Coy, M., and M. Pöhler. 2002. Gated Communities in Latin American Megacities: Case Studies in Brazil and Argentina. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (3): 355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. 2000. Metropolis, Memory and Citizenship. In Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City, edited by E. Isin, 26–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Damstra, R. 2001. Don't Fence Us Out: The Municipal Power to Ban Gated Communities and the Federal Takings Clause. Valparaiso University Law Review 35 (3): 525–560.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dilger, R. 1992. Neighborhood Politics: Residential Community Associations and American Governance. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1996. The New Golden Rule: Community and Modernity in a Democratic Society. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., and H. Boyte. 1986. Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Foldvary, F. 1994. Public Goods and Private Communities: The Market Provision of Social Services. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, K. 2001. Gated Communities in Metro Phoenix: A New Trend in the U.S. American Urban Development. Geographische Rundschau 53 (1): 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, K. 2006. Private Gated Neighbourhoods: A Progressive Trend in US Urban Development. In Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, edited by G. Glasze, C. Webster, and K. Frantz, 64–75. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G. 2003. Private Neighbourhoods as Club Economies and Shareholder Democracies. BELGEO 2003 (1): 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., and A. Alkhayyal. 2002. Gated Housing Estates in the Arab World: Case Studies in Lebanon and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (3): 321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., C. Webster, and K. Frantz, eds. 2006. Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gooblar, A. 2002. Outside the Walls: Urban Gated Communities and Their Regulation within the British Planning System. European Planning Studies 10 (3): 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2005. Planning Responses to Gated Communities in Canada. Housing Studies 20 (2): 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2006. Planning the Good Community: New Urbanism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., ed. 1998. Freedom of Association. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2004. The Right to the City. In The Emancipatory City: Paradoxes and Possibilities, edited by L. Lees, 236–239. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haselhoff, K. 2002. Motivations for the San Fernando Valley Secession Movement: The Political Dynamics of Secession. Journal of Urban Affairs 24 (4): 425–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S. 1957. Citadel, Market, and Altar: Emerging Society, Outline of Socionomy, the New Natural Science of Society. Baltimore, Md.: Science of Society Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, E. 1996. Are Municipalities Tieboutian Clubs Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (2): 203–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkin, N., and E. Kingson, eds. 1998. Special Issue on “Keeping the Promise: Advancing the Intergenerational Agenda for the Twenty‐First Century. Generations 22 (4): 99–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, T. 2004. Building Jerusalem: The Rise and Fall of the Victorian City. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Jupp, B., J. Sainsbury, and O. Akers‐douglas. 1999. Living Together: Community Life on Mixed Tenure Estates. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, J. M., and P. S. Posner. 1990a. Class and Community in an Era of Urban Transformation. In Dilemmas of Activism: Class, Community, and the Politics of Local Mobilization, edited by J. M. Kling and P. S. Posner, 23–45. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, J. M., eds. 1990b. Dilemmas of Activism: Class, Community, and the Politics of Local Mobilization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landman, K. 2004. Gated Communities in South Africa: The Challenge for Spatial Planning and Land Use Management. Town Planning Review 75 (2): 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Le Goix, R. 2005. Gated Communities: Sprawl and Social Segregation in Southern California. Housing Studies 20 (2): 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisch, H. 2002. Gated Communities in Indonesia. Cities 19 (5): 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. 1989. C. B. Macpherson: Dilemmas of Liberalism and Socialism. New York: St. Martins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. 2003. Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, C. B. 1964. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, W. 1993. Private Government Formation in the D.C. Metropolitan Area. Growth and Change 24 (3): 385–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzi, T., and B. Smith‐bowers. 2005. Gated Communities as Club Goods: Segregation or Social Cohesion Housing Studies 20 (2): 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. 1996. The Age of Extremes: Concentrated Affluence and Poverty in the Twenty‐First Century. Demography 33 (4): 395–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mchugh, K., P. Gober, and D. Borough. 2002. The Sun City Wars: Chapter 3. Urban Geography 23 (7): 627–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, E. 1994. Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Private Government. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, E. 2005. Constructing the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A Case Study of Emerging Trends in American Gated Communities. Housing Studies 20 (2): 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, E. 2006. The Dynamics of Privatopia: Private Residential Governance in the USA. In Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, edited by G. Glasze, C. Webster, and K. Frantz, 9–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, P. 2003. Deserted Streets in a Jammed Town: The Gated Community in Chinese Cities and Its Solution. Journal of Urban Design 8 (1): 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. 1981. Cities by Contract: The Politics of Municipal Incorporation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minton, A. 2003. Building Balanced Communities: The U.S. and U.K. Compared. London: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. 1991. Contributor to I. M. Stelzer, G. Gilder, N. Macrae, J. Wanniski, and C. Murray, Musings on “The Shape of Things to Come”. National Review, 8 July, 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. 1927. The Political Ideas of the Greeks. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. 1989. The Privatization of Local Government: From Zoning to RCAs. In Residential Community Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System?, 45–52. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, O. 1972. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, S., and M. Rosentraub. 1997. Dimensions of Inter‐Jurisdictional Cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (2): 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 1997. Ruling Los Angeles. Urban Geography 18 (8): 684–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., L. Feldstein, and D. Cohen. 2003. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. 1991. Secession of the Successful. New York Times Magazine, 20 January, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. W., and R. E. Lang. 2002. Security versus Status: The Two Worlds of Gated Communities. Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech, Draft Census Note 02: 02. [http://www.mi.vt.eduFilesGated20Census20Note11‐19.pdf].
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2002. Difference, Fear and Habitus: A Political Economy of Urban Fears. In Habitus: A Sense of Place, edited by J. Hillier and J. Rooksby, 203–218. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Selbourne, D. 1994. The Principle of Duty: An Essay on the Foundations of Civil Order. London: Sinclair‐Stevenson.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1974. The Fall of Public Man. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 2000. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. 1992. Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Noonday Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, A. 1998. America, the Gated Wilson Quarterly 22 (1): 58–79.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, N. 1992. Snow Crash. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, W. K. 1988. Condominium Owners Grapple with Governing Themselves. New York Times (Late City Final Edition), 1 September, §A, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Teaford, J. 1997. Post‐Suburbia: Government and Politics in the Edge Cities. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thucydides. [431 b.c.e.] 1951. The Peloponnesian War. Translated by R. Crawley. New York: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. 1956. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., J. A. Raffel, S. Sweeney, and L. Denson. 2005. Attracting Middle‐Income Families in the Hope VI Public Housing Revitalization Program. Journal of Urban Affairs 27 (2): 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1922] 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated by E. Fischoff, H. Gerth, A. M. Henderson, F. Kolegar, C. Wright Mills, and others. Edited by G. Roth and C. Whittich. 3 vols. New York: Bedminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. 2001. Gated Communities of Tomorrow. Town Planning Review 72 (2): 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson‐doenges, G. 2000. An Exploration of Sense of Community and Fear of Crime in Gated Communities. Environment and Behavior 32 (5): 597–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirt, C. 1989. Dillon's Rule. Virginia Town and City 24 (8): 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar