The Rise, Fall, and Reconfiguration of the Mexican Ejido*

References

• Altamirano‐jiménez, I. 2004. North American First Peoples: Slipping up into Market Citizenship Citizenship Studies 8 (4): 349–365.
   Google Scholar
• Arce, M., and G. Daniel. 1999. The Political Economy of the Neo‐Liberal Transition. Latin American Research Review 34 (1): 212–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assies, W. 2008. Land Tenure and Tenure Regimes in Mexico: An Overview. Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (1): 33–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow‐strain, A. 2004. (Dis)Accords: The Politics of Market‐Assisted Land Reforms in Chiapas, Mexico. World Development 32 (6): 887–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow‐strain, A. 2007. Intimate Enemies: Landowners, Power, and Violence in Chiapas. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, C. R. 2003. Becoming Campesinos: Politics, Identity and Agrarian Struggle in Post‐Revolutionary Michoacán, 1920–1935. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craib, R. B. 2004. Cartographic Mexico: A History of State Fixations and Fugitive Landscapes. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Ita, A. 2006. Land Concentration in Mexico after PROCEDE. In Promised Land: Competing Visions of Agrarian Reform, edited by P. Rosset, R. Patel, and M. Courville, 148–164. Oakland, Calif.: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, J. 1983. La ciudad invade al ejido: Proletarización, urbanización y lucha política en el Cerro del Judío, D.F. Mexico City: Ediciones de la Casa Chata.
   Google Scholar
• Echánove, F., and C. Steffen. 2005. Agribusiness and Farmers in Mexico: The Importance of Contractual Relations. Geographical Journal 171 (2): 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, M. W. 1995. Privatizing the Countryside: The Mexican Peasant Movement and Neo‐Liberal Reform. Latin American Perspectives 22 (1): 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2008. Geography and Land Reform. Special Issue on “Land Reform. Geographical Review 98 (3): 309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, L. 1995. State Sponsored Land Certification and Titling Programs and Changing State‐Producer Relations: Ejido Reform in Mexico. Common Property Resource Digest, No. 33: 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, C. 2000. The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries. World Development 28 (5): 789–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenn, N. 2006. The Changing and Enduring Ejido: A State and Regional Examination of Mexico's Land Tenure Counter‐Reforms. Land Use Policy 23 (2): 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlihy, P. H., J. E. Dobson, M. Aguilar Robledo, D. A. Smith, J. H. Kelly, and A. Ramos Viera. 2008. The Digital Geography of Indigenous Mexico: Prototype for the American Geographical Society's Bowman Expeditions. Geographical Review 98 (3): 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., and P. M. Ward. 1998. Privatizing the Commons: Reforming the Ejido and Urban Development in Mexico. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (1): 76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepeis, P., and P. Laris. 2008. Hobby Ranching and Chile's Land‐Reform Legacy. Special Issue on “Land Reform. Geographical Review 98 (3): 372–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepeis, P., and C. Vance. 2003. Neo‐Liberal Policy and Deforestation in Southeastern Mexico: An Assessment of the PROCAMPO Program. Economic Geography 79 (3): 221–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klooster, D. 2003. Forest Transitions in Mexico: Institutions and Forests in a Globalized Countryside. Professional Geographer 55 (2): 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourí, E. 2004. A Pueblo Divided: Business, Property, and Community in Papantla, Mexico. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lunstrum, E. 2008. Mozambique, Neoliberal Land Reform, and the Limpopo National Park. Special Issue on “Land Reform. Geographical Review 98 (3): 339–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, D. 2004. Downsizing the State: Privatization and the Limits of Neoliberal Reform in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mccarthy, J. J. 2004. Privatizing Conditions of Production: Trade Agreements as Neo‐Liberal Environmental Governance. Geoforum 35 (3): 327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, J. H. 2001. Reconfiguring the Countryside: Power, Control, and the (Re)Organization of Farmers in West Mexico. Human Organization 60 (3): 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, A. D. 2003. Structural Change and Neo‐Liberalism in Mexico: “Passive Revolution” in the Global Political Economy. Third World Quarterly 24 (4): 631–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, W. G., and B. Mccusker. 2008. Fighting Fire with a Broken Teacup: A Comparative Analysis of South Africa's Land‐Redistribution Program. Special Issue on “Land Reform. Geographical Review 98 (3): 322–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuijten, M. 2003. Family Property and the Limits of Intervention: The Article 27 Reforms and the PROCEDE Programme in Mexico. Development and Change 34 (3): 475–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'toole, G. 2003. A New Nationalism for a New Era: The Political Ideology of Mexican Neo‐Liberalism. Bulletin of Latin American Research 22 (3): 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, M., and C. Wise. 1997. State Policy, Distribution and Neo‐Liberal Reform in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies 29 (2): 419–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson, D., L. Gerzon, and M. Watts. 2003. Locating the Political in Political Ecology: An Introduction. Human Organization 62 (3): 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perramond, E. P. 1996. Hot Cows and Green Pastures in the Rio Sonora Country, Mexico. Geographical Review 86 (3): 462–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAN [Registro Agrario Nacional]. 2006. Registro Agrario Nacional. Mexico City: Secretaría de la Reforma Agraria. Formerly at [www.ran.gob.mxarchivos12.htm].
   Google Scholar
• Randall, L. 1996a. Changing Structure of Mexico: Political, Social, and Economic Prospects. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, L. 1996b. Reforming Mexico's Agrarian Reform. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, L. 1997. The Political Economy of Latin America in the Postwar Period. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., R. Patel, and M. Courville, eds. 2006. Promised Land: Competing Visions of Agrarian Reform. Oakland, Calif.: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. 1988. Where the Dove Calls. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2007. Urban Expansion in Oaxaca, Mexico: Research on the Fringe. In Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, edited by J. W. Craine, 88–100. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press for the APCG.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenfeld, D. A. 1992. Mexico's “Green Revolution,” 1940–1980: Towards an Environmental History. Environmental History Review 16 (4): 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, L. 1998. The Cultural and Political Dynamics of Agrarian Reform in Oaxaca and Chiapas. In The Future Role of the Ejido in Rural Mexico, edited by R. Snyder and G. Torres, 7–30. La Jolla: University of California‐San Diego, Center for U.S.‐Mexican Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, L. 2002. Zapata Lives! Histories and Cultural Politics in Southern Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. L. 2003. Reorganization or Division? New Strategies of Community Forestry in Durango, Mexico. Society & Natural Resources 16 (7): 643–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, R. M., and J. D. Momsen. 2005. Gringolandia: The Construction of a New Tourist Space in Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2): 314–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, J. D. 2006. Land Tenure and the “Evidence Landscape” in Developing Countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (4): 754–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassberg, D. 1984. Land and Society in Golden Age Castile. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 1994. Development II: The Privatization of Everything Progress in Human Geography 18 (3): 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, M., and P. Romero Lankao. 2006. Paradoxes of Decentralization: Water Reform and Social Implications in Mexico. World Development 34 (11): 1977–1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 1993. Democracy and the “Washington Consensus. World Development 21 (8): 1329–1336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A., and W. Wolford. 2003. To Inherit the Earth: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for a New Brazil. Oakland, Calif.: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yetman, D., and A. Búrquez. 1998. Twenty‐Seven: A Case Study in Ejido Privatization in Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Research 54 (1): 73–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar