“Poppies Are Democracy!” a Critical Geopolitics Of Opium Eradication And Reintroduction In Turkey*

References

• Ahmad, D. L. 2007. The Opium Debate and Chinese Exclusion Laws in the Nineteenth‐Century American West. Reno : University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altindal, A. 1979. Hashas ve Emperyalizm (Poppies and Imperialism). Istanbul : HAVASS.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. K. 1984. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization 38 (2): 225–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. K. 1987. The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics. Alternatives 12 (4): 403–434.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, M. 1998. Opium: A History. New York : St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. V. 1970. Report on BNDD/Turkey Opium Control Pilot Program. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 1988. Recent Changes in Social Theory: Questions for International Relations. In New Directions in International Relations? Australian Perspectives, edited by R. A. Higgott, 11–64. Canberra : Australian National University, Department of International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Coufoudakis, V. 1981. Turkey and the United States: The Problems and Prospects of a Post‐War Alliance. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 9 (2): 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. B. 1980. Operation Intercept: The International Politics of Pressure. Review of Politics 42 (4): 556–580.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 1991. Critical Geopolitics: Discourse, Difference, and Dissent. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9 (3): 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 1996. The Environment as Geopolitical Threat: Reading Robert Kaplan's “Coming Anarchy.” Cultural Geographies 3 (4): 472–496.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 2002. Environmental Security. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debrix, F. 2008. Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics. London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2010. Popular Culture, Geopolitics, and Identity. Lanham , Md. : Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, K. J., and J. D. Sidaway. 1994. Locating Critical Geopolitics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12 (5): 515–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecevit, B. 1976. Dis Politika (World Politics). Ankara : Ajans‐Türk Matbaacilik Sanayii.
   Google Scholar
• Ecevit, B. 1996. Önsöz. In Beyaz Savas: Türk‐Ameriikan Iliskilerinde Afyon Sorunu (White War: The Opium Problem in Turkish‐American Relations), edited by Ç. Erhan, 11–15. Ankara : Bilgi Yayinevi.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, E. J. 1990. Agency of Fear: Opiates and Political Power in America. Rev. ed. London : Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Erhan, Ç. 1996. Beyaz Savas: Türk‐Amerikan Iliskilerinde Afyon Sorunu (White War: The Opium Problem in Turkish‐American Relations). Ankara : Bilgi Yayinevi.
   Google Scholar
• Evered, K. T. 2011. Traditional Ecologies of the Opium Poppy and Oral History in Rural Turkey. Geographical Review 101 (2): 164–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. 2004. The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq. Oxford : Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, N. G. 1972. Bilateral and Multilateral Efforts to Intensify Drug Abuse Control Programs. Department of State Bulletin 66 (April‐June): 504–512.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. J. 1998. Troubling Fields: The Opium Poppy in Egypt. Geographical Review 88 (1): 64–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Info‐Türk Ajansi. 1974. Hashas Tuzagi. Brussels : Info‐Türk Ajansi.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, J. F. 1970. U.S. Proposes New U.N. Action Program against Illicit Narcotics. Department of State Bulletin 63 (October‐December): 492–497.
   Google Scholar
• JT‐AAM [Joint Turkish‐American Agricultural Mission]. 1971. Hashas Ekim Bölgelerinde Tarimsal Gelirin Gelistirilmesi: Türk‐Amerikan Müsterek Tarim Komisyonunun Tavsiyeleri I Improving Farm Income in the Poppy Region: Recommendations of the Joint Turkish/American Agricultural Mission. Ankara : Joint Turkish‐American Agricultural Mission.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, G. 2008. Progressive Geopolitics. Geography Compass 2 (5): 1599–1620.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, N. E. 1994. A History of Federal Crime Control Initiatives, 1960–1993. Westport , Conn. : Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Mccoy, A. W. 2003. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade: Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, Central America, Colombia. Rev. ed. Chicago : Lawrence Hill Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mccoy, A. W. 2004. The Stimulus of Prohibition: A Critical History of the Global Narcotics Trade. In Dangerous Harvest: Drug Plants and the Transformation of Indigenous Landscapes, edited by M. K. Steinberg, J. J. Hobbs, and K. Mathewson, 24–111. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milliyet. 1974. Ecevit Meclis'te Hashas Için Konustu (Ecevit Speaks at the Council for Opium). Milliyet (Nation), 3 July, 1, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Milliyet. 1975. BM Raporu: Türkiye, Gayrimesrû, Hashas Üretimini Önledi (U.N. Report: Turkey's Hard Work Prevents Opium Production). Milliyet (Nation), 17 December, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Musto, D. F. 1999. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. 3rd ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musto, D. F., and P. Korsmeyer. 2002. The Quest for Drug Control: Politics and Federal Policy in a Period of Increasing Substance Abuse, 1963–1981. New Haven , Conn. : Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newsday Staff. 1975. The Heroin Trail: The First Journalistic Investigation to Trace Heroin Traffic from Turkey to France to Its Ultimate Customer, the Young American Addict! London : Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. M. 1969a. Special Message to the Congress on Control of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. In The American Presidency Project, compiled by J. T. Woolley and G. Peters, document 266, 14 July. [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2126#axzz1QPW73Wui].
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. M. 1969b. Remarks at a Bipartisan Leadership Meeting on Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. In The American Presidency Project, compiled by J. T. Woolley and G. Peters, document 404, 23 October. [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2280#axzz1QPW73Wui].
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. M. 1971. Special Message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control. In The American Presidency Project, compiled by J. T. Woolley and G. Peters, document 203, 17 June. [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=3048#axzz1QPW73Wui].
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. M. 1972. Remarks on the Signing of the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972. In The American Presidency Project, compiled by J. T. Woolley and G. Peters, document 96, 21 March. [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=3781axzz1QPW73Wui].
   Google Scholar
• Ó tuathail, G. 1989. Critical Geopolitics: The Social Construction of Space and Place in the Practice of Statecraft. Ph.D. diss. Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Ó tuathail, G. 1996. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oral, Ö. 1972. Hashas Tazminati Zarari Karsilamiyor (Compensation Does Not Cover Opium Losses). Milliyet (Nation), 23 March, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Perramond, E. P. 2001. Oral Histories and Partial Truths in Mexico. Geographical Review 91 (1–2): 151–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, P. 2007. The Opium Crisis and the Iraq War: Historical Parallels in Turkey‐U.S. Relations. Mediterranean Politics 12 (1): 17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. F. 2003. Political Ecology in Political Geography. Political Geography 22 (6): 641–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. F. 2010. Human‐Environment Field Study. In Research Methods in Geography: A Critical Introduction, edited by B. Gomez and J. P. Jones III, 241–256. Oxford : Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, P. 2000. Endless Propaganda: The Advertising of Public Goods. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. P. 2000. Condensing the Cold War: Reader's Digest and American Identity. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2004. American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization. Berkeley : University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spain, J. W. 1975. The United States, Turkey, and the Poppy. Middle East Journal 29 (3): 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. K., J. J. Hobbs, and K. Mathewson, eds. 2004. Dangerous Harvest: Drug Plants and the Transformation of Indigenous Landscapes. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. 1974. The Politics of the Poppy: Report of a Study Mission to Turkey, March 14–16, 1974, Pursuant to H. Res. 109, Authorizing the Committee on Foreign Affairs to Conduct Thorough Studies and Investigations of All Matters Coming within the Jurisdiction of the Committee. Washington , D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. 1975. The Effectiveness of Turkish Opium Control: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Future Foreign Policy Research and Development of the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, Ninety‐fourth Congress, First Session, September 11, 1975. Washington , D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• USDoS [U.S. Department of State]. 1945. Limitation of the Production of Opium: Exchange of Notes between the Governments of the United States and Turkey. Department of State Bulletin 13 (July‐September): 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• USDoS [U.S. Department of State]. 1971a. Agricultural Mission to Turkey to be led by Secretary Hardin. Department of State Bulletin 65 (October‐December): 413–414.
   Google Scholar
• USDoS [U.S. Department of State]. 1971b. United States Hails Turkish Decision to Ban Opium Poppy Production. Department of State Bulletin 65 (July‐September): 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• USDoS [U.S. Department of State]. 1972. Prime Minister Erim of Turkey Visits the United States. Department of State Bulletin 66 (April‐June): 599–604.
   Google Scholar
• Uslu, N. 2003. The Turkish‐American Relationship between 1947 and 2003: The History of a Distinctive Alliance. New York : Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. B. J. 1987. Realism, Change, and International Political Theory. International Studies Quarterly 31 (1): 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. B. J. 1988. Genealogy, Geopolitics, and Political Community: Richard K. Ashley and the Critical Social Theory of International Relations. Alternatives 13 (1): 84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. R. 1971. Drug Abuse: A Challenge to US‐Turkish Cooperation in the Seventies. Department of State Bulletin 64 (January‐March): 140–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, D. 1974. The Opium Poppy: The Forbidden Crop. Journal of Geography 73 (1): 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner, J. L. 1973. The 1972 Turkish Opium Ban: Needle in the Haystack Diplomacy. World Affairs 136 (1): 36–47.
   Google Scholar