Safety Measures after the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado

References

• Beito, D. T., and D. J. Smith. 2012. Tornado Recovery: How Joplin is Beating Tuscaloosa. Wall Street Journal, 13 April.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, T. V., and B. K. Paul. 2003. Public Response to a Tornado Disaster: The Case of Hoisington, KS. Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences 26: 343–351.
   Google Scholar
• City of Joplin. 2013. Joplin, Missouri Hit by EF‐5 Tornado on May 22, 2011: General Information. 1 July.
   Google Scholar
• Christoplos, I. 2006. The Elusive ‘Window of Opportunity’ for Risk Reduction in Post‐Disaster Recovery. Discussion Paper. Bangkok, Thailand: Prevention Consortium Forum 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, M., and S. Gerking. 1996. Formation of Risk Beliefs, Joint Production and Willingness to Pay to Avoid Skin Cancer. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (3): 451–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, R. n.d. Disaster Management Lifecycle. Manchester: Centre for Disaster Resilience. Manchester, U.K.: University of Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Janmaat, J. 2007. A Little Knowledge: Household Water Quality in Investment in the Annapolis Valley. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 55 (2): 233–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. 2013. Debris is Gone and New Projects Mark the City's Ongoing Recovery. USA Today, 21 May.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, L. H. 2003. Town Battle But Not Broken. The Kansas City Star, 18 May, B1 and B4.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agenda, Alternatives and Public Policy. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Mckinney, R. 2012. More than 100 Houses in Works through Nonprofits, Other Groups. Joplin Globe, 1 February.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2012. Wall Street Journal: Joplin and Tuscaloosa's Approaches to Disaster Recovery. Uncategorized, 22 April.
   Google Scholar
• Mileti, D. S. 1999. Disaster by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olshansky, R. B. 2006. Planning after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of American Planning Association 72 (2): 147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B. K. 2011. Environmental Hazards and Disasters: Contexts, Perspectives and Management. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley‐Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B. K., and D. Che. 2011. Opportunity and Challenges in Rebuilding Tornado‐Impacted Greensburg, Kansas as “Stronger, Better, and Greener”. GeoJournal 76 (1): 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B. K., and M. Stimers. 2012. Exploring Probable Reasons for Record Fatalities: The Case of 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado. Natural Hazards 64: 1511–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B. K., and M. Stimers 2014. Spatial Analyses of the 2011 Joplin Tornado Mortality: Deaths by Interpolated Damage Zones and Location of Victims. Weather, Climate and Society 6: 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B. K., D. Che, M. Stimers, and S. Dutt. 2009. Disaster in Kansas: The Tornado in Greensburg. Quick Response Report #196. Boulder, Colo.: The Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, Rutherford. 1998. Planning and Land Use Adjustments in Historical Perspective. In Cooperating with Nature, edited by Raymond Burby, 29–56. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prater, C. S., and M. K. Lindell. 2000. Politics of Hazard Mitigation. Natural Hazards Review 1 (2): 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Roueche, D. B., and D. O. Prevatt. 2013. Residential Damage Patterns Following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL and Joplin, MO Tornadoes. Journal of Disaster Research 8 (6): 1061–1067.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, K. M., and D. Sutter. 2011. Economic and Societal Impacts of Tornadoes. Boston: American Metrological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, K. M., and D. Sutter 2012. Deadly Season: Analysis of the 2011 Tornado Outbreaks. Boston: American Metrological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J., and D. Sutter. 2013. Response and Recovery after the Joplin Tornado: Lessons Applied and Lessons Learned. Independent Review 18 (2): 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, K., M. K. Lindell, and R. W. Perry. 2001. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Younker, E., and M. Kabel. 2011. Joplin Homebuilder Celebrates Tax‐Credit Project. Joplin Globe, 16 June.
   Google Scholar