66
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Geographical review essay

Megaregions Imaginaries: Excursions Through a Dialectical Maze

Pages 536-550 | Received 07 Mar 2016, Accepted 07 Mar 2016, Published online: 04 Nov 2019

References

  • Brenner, N. 1998a. Between Fixity and Motion: Accumulation, Territorial Organization and the Historical Geography of Spatial Scales. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16 (4): 459–81.
  • Brenner, N. 1998b. Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy 5 (1): 1–37.
  • Brenner, N. 1999. Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re‐ scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union. Urban Studies 36 (3): 431–51.
  • Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brenner, N. 2009. Open Questions on State Rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 39 (2): 123–39.
  • Brenner, N. I., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and the Geography of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. In Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Europe, edited by N. Brenner and N. Theodore, 349–379. Oxford: Wiley.
  • Carbonell, A., and R. D. Yaro. 2005. American Spatial Development and the New Megalopolis. Land Lines 17 (2): 1–4.
  • Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
  • Cochrane, A., and K. Pain. 2000. A Globalising Society? In A Globalising World? Culture, Economics, Politics, edited by D. Held, 5–45. London: Routledge.
  • Faludi, A., ed, 2002. European Spatial Planning, Cambridge, Mass: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Faludi, A., ed, 2010. Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? London: Routledge.
  • Florida, R., T. Gulden, and C. Mellande. 2008. The Rise of the Megaregion. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (3): 459–76.
  • Gravier, J. F. 1947. Paris et le Désert Français. Paris: Le Portulan.
  • Hagler, Y. 2009. Defining US Megaregions, America 2050. New York: Regional Plan Association. http://www.america2050.org/upload/2010/09/2050_Defining_US_Megaregions.pdf
  • Halbert, L. 2006. The Polycentric City Region That Never Was: The Paris Agglomeration, Bassin Parisien and Spatial Planning Strategies in France. Built Environment 32 (2): 184–193.
  • Halbert, L., K. Pain, and A. Thierstein. 2006. European Polycentricity and Emerging Mega‐City Regions ‐ ‘One Size Fits All’ Policy? Built Environment 32 (2): 206–218.
  • Halbert, L., K. Pain, and P. J. Taylor. 2007. Services Globaux, Géographies Locales: Les Services Avances aux Entreprises á Paris et Londres. French Speaking Regional Science Association Annual Meeting 2007. Grenoble France: Association de Science Regionale de Langue Francaise.
  • Halbert, L., and K. Pain 2009. PAR‐LON: Doing Business in Knowledge‐Based Services in Paris and London: A Tale of One City? Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) Research Network Bulletin 307. Loughborough: Globalization and World Cities Research Network. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb307.html
  • Halbert, L. 2010. Services Globaux, Géographies Locales: Les Services aux Entreprises dans les Métropoles de Londres et Paris. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Espace, Société, Territoire 510. http://cybergeo.revues.org/23337510
  • Hall, P., and K. Pain, eds. 2006. The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega‐City Regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
  • Harrison, J., and K. Pain, eds. 2012. Global Cities, Volume IV: Planning and Governance of Cities in Globalization. London: Routledge.
  • Lambregts, B. 2006. Polycentricity: Boon or Barrier to Metropolitan Competitiveness? The Case of the Randstad Holland. Built Environment 32 (2): 114–123.
  • Lang, R. E., and D. Dhavale. 2005a. America's Megapolitan Areas. Land Lines 17 (3): 1–4.
  • Lang, R. E. 2005b. Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America's New ‘Megapolitan’ Geography. Metropolitan Institute Census Report Series 05:01, May 2005. Alexandria, Va.: Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech. http://america2050.org/pdf/beyondmegalopolislang.pdf
  • Lang, R. E., and P. J. Taylor. 2005. U.S. Cities in the ‘World City Network. Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
  • Lang, R. E., and A. C. Nelson. 2007. America 2040: The Rise of the Megapolitans. Planning Magazine of the American Planning Association 6th January.
  • Lang, R. E. 2009. Megapolitan America: Defining and Applying a New Geography. In Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness, edited by C. L. Ross, 107–126. Washington D.C.: Island Press
  • Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Regional Plan Association and University of Pennsylvania School of Design. 2004. Toward an American Spatial Development Perspective. Briefing Book for a Policy Roundtable on the Federal Role in Metropolitan Development. New York: Regional Plan Association.
  • Mehlbye, P. 2000. Global Integration Zones – Neighbouring Metropolitan Regions in Metropolitan Clusters. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 11 (12): 755–762.
  • Montgomery, C., ed. 2011. Regional Planning for a Sustainable America: How Creative Programs are Promoting Prosperity and Saving the Environment. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
  • Ohmae, K. 1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. London: Harper Collins.
  • Pain, K. 2009. Londres: The Place to Be. Sciences Humaines, Les Grands Dossiers 17:30–32.
  • Pain, K. 2010. The Emerging Metacity in North Western Europe and Policy Ramifications for Sustainable Transport Networks. In The Emerging Cross‐border Mega‐city region and Sustainable Transportation KOTI‐EWC 2010 Special Report, edited by C. Mo and Y.H. Kim, 2–27, Hawaii / Korea: East‐West Center / The Korea Transport Institute.
  • Pain, K. 2011a. ‘New Worlds’ for ‘Old’? Twenty‐First‐Century Century Gateways and Corridors: Reflections on a European Spatial Perspective, International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 35 (6): 1154–74.
  • Pain, K. 2011b. Les Macro‐Regions en Europe: Ile‐de‐France, Espace Fluides. In Proceedings Séminaire Européen ‐ Quelles Perspectives pour les Métropoles en Europe? Un Regard Croisé sur l'Ile‐de‐France, 33–38. Paris: IAU‐IDF (Institut d'aménagement et d'urbanisme de la région Ile de France) / Ile de France Europe.
  • Pain, K. 2016. The Strategic Planning Protagonist: Unveiling the Global Mega‐city Region. In Sir Peter Hall – Pioneers in Regional Planning, Transport and Urban Geography, edited by R. Knowles and C. Rozenblatt. International Geographical Union (IGU) Commission on Transport and Geography and International Geographical Union (IGU) Urban Commission, forthcoming. New York: Springer.
  • Pain, K. 2017. World City. In The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology: Economic Geography and Regional Development, edited by D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. L. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. Marston, forthcoming. Chichester, U.K.: The Association of American Geographers / John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pain, K., and P. Hall 2008. Informational Quantity Versus Informational Quality: The Perils of Navigating the Space of Flows. Regional Studies 42 (8): 1065–.1077.
  • Pain, K., and G. Van Hamme, eds. 2014. Changing Urban and Regional Relations in a Globalizing World: Europe as a Global Macro‐Region. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Porter, M. 2001. Regions and the New Economics of Competition. In Global City‐Regions; Trends, Theory, Policy, edited by A. J. Scott, 139–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pushkarev, B. 1969. The Atlantic Urban Seaboard: Development Issues and Strategies. Regional Plan News 90 September. New York: Regional Plan Association.
  • Regional Plan Association. 2006a. America 2050: A Prospectus. New York: Regional Plan Association. http://www.america2050.org/pdf/America2050prospectus.pdf
  • Regional Plan Association. 2006b. America 2050 To‐wards a National Strategy for Prosperity, Equity and Sustainability. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Policy Roundtable on Mega‐Regional 36 Development. Tarrytown, N.Y.: Regional Plan Association.
  • Regional Plan Association. 2008. America 2050: An Infrastructure Vision for 21st Century America. New York: Regional Plan Association.
  • Ross, C., ed. 2009. Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness. Washington DC: Island Press.
  • Sassen, S. 2007. Megaregions: Benefits Beyond Sharing Trains and Parking Lots. In The Economic Geography of Megaregions, edited by K. S. Goldfeld, 59–83. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.
  • Scott, A. J. 2001. Globalization and the Rise of City‐ regions. European Planning Studies 9 (7): 813–26.
  • Short, J. R. 2010. Liquid City: Megalopolis and the Contemporary Northeast. Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.
  • Taylor, P. J. 2004. World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, P. J., and R. E. Lang. 2004. US Cities in the World City Network, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Survey Series, December. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  • Taylor, P. J., D. M. Evans, and K. Pain. 2006. Organisation of the Polycentric Metropolis: Corporate Structures and Networks. In The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega‐City Regions in Europe, edited by P. Hall and K. Pain, 53–64. London: Earthscan.
  • Taylor, P. J., and K. Pain, 2007. Polycentric Mega‐City Regions: Exploratory Research from Western Europe. In The Healdsburg Research Seminar on Megaregions, edited by P. Todorovich, 59–67. Cambridge, Mass.: Regional Plan Association, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Todorovich, P., ed. 2007a. The Healdsburg Research Seminar on Megaregions. Cambridge, Mass.: Regional Plan Association, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Todorovich, P., ed. 2007b. Introduction. The Economic Geography of Megaregions, edited by K. S. Goldfeld, 3–10. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.
  • Todorovich, P., ed. 2011. Megaregion Planning and High‐Speed Rail. In Regional Planning for a Sustainable America: How Creative Programs are Promoting Prosperity and Saving the Environment, edited by C. Montgomery, 261–267. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.