Firm competitiveness and regional disparities in Georgia

References

• Altomonte, C., and I. Colantone. 2008. Firm Heterogeneity and Endogenous Regional Disparities. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (6): 779–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and R. Pomfret. 2004. Spatial Inequality and Development in Central Asia. UNU‐WIDER Research Paper No. 2004/36), United Nations University (UNU).
   Google Scholar
• Backman, M. 2013. Human Capital in Firms and Regions: Impact on Firm Productivity. Papers in Regional Science 93 (3): 557–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, B., and M. Jarmuzek. 2009. Anatomy of Regional Disparities in the Slovak Republic. IMF Working Paper No. 09/145.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P.E., D.N. Dejong, and W. Troesken. 2001. Population Growth in U.S. Counties, 1840–1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31: 669–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, A.B., and J.B. Jensen. (2004). Why Some Firms Export, Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (2): 561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L.G. 2001. Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Journal of International Economics 53 (1): 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, G. 2010. Resilient Regions: Re‐'Place'ing Regional Competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3: 153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brülhart, M. 2011. The Spatial Effects of Trade Openness: A Survey. Review of World Economics 147: 59–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, N., I. Gordon, A. Harding, and I. Turok. 2005. Changing Cities: Rethinking Urban Competitiveness, Cohesion and Governance. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, N.F., and F. Coricelli. 2002. Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't, and What We Should. Journal of Economic Literature 40 (3): 793–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chankseliani, M. 2013. Rural Disadvantage in Georgian Higher Education Admissions: A Mixed‐Methods Study. Comparative Education Review 57 (3): 424–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinitz, B. 1961. Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. The American Economic Review 51 (2): 279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, E. 2008. The Non‐Observed Economy in Georgia: Economic Analysis and Policy Recommendations. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccone, A. 2002. Agglomeration Effects in Europe. European Economic Review 46:213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G. and D. Puga. 2001. Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1454–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G. and D. Puga 2004. Micro‐foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies, In J.V. Henderson and J.F. Thisse, eds., Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4: 2063–2117. North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, G. and E.L. Glaeser. 1999. The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration? American Economic Review 89 (2): 311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farole, T., A. Rodríguez‐pose and M. Storper. 2011. Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (5): 1089–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M.P. 1994. The Geography of Innovation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., P. Krugman and A. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M. and J.F. Thisse. 2002. Economics of Agglomeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski, P.A. 1995. What Do We Know about Entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization 13: 421–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P. 2007. Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a World where Differences Still Matter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giannias, D., P. Liargovas, and Y. Chepurko. 2005. Regional Disparities as Barriers to Transition to a Market Economy: The Russian Experience. The Journal of Developing Areas 38 (2): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. and W. Kerr. 2009. Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18 (3): 623–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. and D. Maré. 2001. Cities and Skills. Journal of Labor Economics 19 (2): 316–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman and A. Shleifer. 1992. Growth in Cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., Y.D. Wei, and X. Xie. 2008. Globalization, institutional change, and industrial location: Economic transition and industrial concentration in China. Regional Studies 42 (7): 923–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, P. 2007. Regional Labor Market Developments in Transition: A Survey of the Empirical Literature. European Journal of Comparative Economics 4 (2): 263–298.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R. and X. Zhang. 2005. Fifty Years of Regional Inequality in China: a Journey Through Central Planning, Reform, and Openness. Review of Development Economics 9 (1): 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1997. Pop Internationalism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuriakose, S. 2013. Fostering Entrepreneurship in Georgia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lessmann, C. 2009. Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: Evidence from Cross‐section and Panel Data. Environment and Planning A 41 (10): 2455–2473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin. 2003. Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies 70: 317–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., B. Malmberg and B. Lundeqvist. 2000. Agglomeration and Firm Performance: Economies of Scale, Localisation, and Urbanisation among Swedish Export Firms. Environment and Planning A 32: 305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murrell, P. 2005. Institutions and Firms in Transition Economies, In C. Menard and M.M. Shirley, eds., Handbook of New Institutional Economics, 667–699. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G.I.P. and J.F. Thisse. 2004. Agglomeration and Economic Geography, In J.V. Henderson and J.F. Thisse, eds., Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, 2563–2608. North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G.I.P. and J.F. Thisse 2005. New Economic Geography: What About the N? Environment and Planning A 37 (10): 1707–1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsoy, I. and M. Kubetova. 2006. The Development of Business Sector in Georgia. IBSU Scientific Journal 1 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Prud'homme, R. 1995. The Dangers of Decentralisation. World Bank Research Observer 10: 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y. 2002. How Reform Worked in China,.William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 473a, June 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. and J.D. Sachs. 2003. The United States as a Coastal Nation. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (1): 5–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M.J. and J.R. Tybout. 1997. The Decision to Export in Colombia: an Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs. The American Economic Review 87 (4): 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐pose, A. 2012. Trade and Regional Inequality. Economic Geography 88 (2): 109–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐pose, A. and R. Ezcurra. 2010. Does Decentralization Matter for Regional Disparities? A Cross‐country Analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 10 (5): 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐pose, A. and N. Gill. 2005. On the ‘Economic Dividend’ of Devolution. Regional Studies 39 (4): 405–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐pose, A. and A. Krøijer. 2009. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change 40 (3): 387–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1988. Social Network Analysis. Sociology 22 (1): 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Tatar, M. 2010. Estonian Local Government Absorption Capacity of European Union Structural Funds. Administrative Culture 11 (2): 202–226.
   Google Scholar
• Timm, C. 2013. Economic Regulation and State Interventions: Georgia's Move from Neoliberalism to State Managed Capitalism. PFH Forschungspapiere/Research Paper No. 2013/03: Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Tondl, G. and G. Vuksic. 2003. What Makes Regions in Eastern Europe Catching up? The Role of Foreign Investment, Human Resources and Geography,. ZEI working paper No. B 12‐2003.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J.G. 2005. Winners and Losers over Two Centuries of Globalization. Wider Perspectives on Global Development. UNU‐WIDER, Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 136–174.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. Doing Business 2011: Georgia ‐ Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs: Comparing Business Regulation in 183 Economies. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar