Migration and Development? The Gendered Costs of Migration on Mexico's Rural “Left Behind”

References

• Anguiano‐téllez, M. E. 2005. Rumbo al Norte: Nuevos Destinos de la Emigración Veracruzana. Migraciones Internacionales 3(1): 82–110.
   Google Scholar
• Antman, F. 2010. Adult Child Migration and the Health of Elderly Parents Left Behind in Mexico. American Economic Review 100 (2):205‐208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. 2010. Population Geographies, Gender, and the Migration‐Development Nexus. Progress in Human Geography 34(3): 375–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., D. Clifford, and G. Falkingham. 2013. Household Members’ Migration and the Education of Children “Left Behind”: Empirical Findings from Tajikistan and Reflections for Research Practice. Population, Space and Place 19: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biao, X. 2007. How Far Are the Left‐Behind Left Behind? A Preliminary Study in Rural China. Population, Space and Place 13(3): 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binford, L. 2003. Migrant Remittances and (Under)Development in Mexico. Critique of Anthropology 23: 305–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buvinić, M., and G. Rao gupta. 1997. Female‐Headed Households and Female‐Maintained Families: Are They Worth Targeting to Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries? Economic Development and Cultural Change 45(2): 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carte, L., M. Mcwatters, E. Daley, and R. Torres. 2010. Experiencing Agricultural Failure: Internal Migration, Tourism and Local Perceptions of Regional Change in the Yucatan. Geoforum 41: 700–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, E., and L. Buck. 2011. Remittances, Transnational Parenting, and the Children Left Behind: Economic and Psychological Implications. The Latin Americanist 55(4): 85–110.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S., and R. Delgado wise, eds. 2008. Migration and Development: Perspectives from the South. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Coon, J. 2007. Migration, Remittances, and Sustainable Community Development in Mexico. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Dannecker, P. 2009. Migrant Visions of Development: A Gendered Approach. Population, Space and Place 15: 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Garza, R. 2010. Migration, Development and Children Left Behind: A Multidimensional Perspective. Social and Economic Policy Working Paper. UNICEF policy and practice. 18 July 2013. [http://www.unicef.org]
   Google Scholar
• Delgado wise, R., and H. Márquez covarrubias. 2008. Capitalist Restructuring, Development and Labour Migration: The Mexico‐U.S. Case. Third World Quarterly 29(7): 1359–1374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado wise, R., H. Márquez covarrubias, and R. Puentes. 2013. Reframing the Debate on Migration, Development and Human Rights. Population, Space and Place 19: 430–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowler, L., and J. Sharp. 2001. A Feminist Geopolitics? Space & Polity 5(3): 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Dreby, J. 2007. Children and Power in Mexican Transnational Family. Journal of Marriage and Family 69: 1050–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, J., V. Lozano, and R. Romo. 2005. Interviewer's Manual. Mexican Migration Project (MMP), September 2005. 18 July 2013 [http://mmp.opr.princeton.edu]
   Google Scholar
• Durand, J., and D. S. Massey. 2003. Clandestinos: Migración México‐Estados Unidos en Los Albores del Siglo XXI. Zacatecas: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas.
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, I. 2005. Feminist Geography, the ‘Everyday’, and Local‐Global Relations: Hidden Spaces of Place‐making. Suzanne Mackenzie Memorial Lecture. The Canadian Geographer 49(3): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, D. 2003. Policy Research on Migration and Development. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3117.
   Google Scholar
• Faist, T. 2008. Migrants as Transnational Development Agents: An Inquiry into the Newest Round of the Migration‐Development Nexus. Population, Space and Place 14: 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, P. 1996. On Suffering and Structural Violence: a View From Below. Daedalus 125(1): 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, A. M., and F. L. N. Li. 1997. An Auto‐biographical Approach to Understanding Migration: The Case of Hong Kong Emigrants. Area 29(1): 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, R., and E. Wildsmith. 2005. The Grass Widows of Mexico: Migration and Union Dissolution in a Binational Context. Social Forces 83(3): 919–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundación BBVA Bancomer. 2012. In 2011, Remittances to Mexico Recorded its Highest Annual Growth From the Last 5 Years. In BBCA Research Migration Flash. February 1st, 2012. 18 July 2013. D.F. Mexico: [http://www.bbvaresearch.com]
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. and A. Pécoud. 2013. Migration, Development and the ‘Migration and Development Nexus’. Population, Space and Place 19(4): 369–374.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewald, S. F., and M. M. Van Den Berg. 2012. Smallholder Livelihood Adaptation in the Context of Neoliberal Policy Reforms: a Case of Maize Farmers in Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Development Studies 48(3): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi, A. 2001. International Migration and the Change of Women's Position Among the Left‐behind in Rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Population Geography 7: 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Halfacree, K. H., and P. J. Boyle. 1993. The Challenge Facing Migration Research: The Case for a Biographical Approach. Progress in Human Geography 17(3): 333–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, E., and S. B. Coutin. 2006. Remitting Subjects: Migrants, Money and States. Economy and Society 35(2): 185–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, S. 2013. Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies: Migrant Farmworkers in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Housen, T., S. Hopkins, and J. Earnest. 2012. A Systematic Review on the Impact of Internal Remittances on Poverty and Consumption in Developing Countries: Implications for Policy. Population, Space and Place: 19(5): 610–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2001. Towards a Feminist Geopolitics. The Canadian Geographer 45(2): 210–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 1995. Ambivalent Journey: U. S. Migration and Economic Mobility in North‐Central Mexico. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabbanji, L. 2013. Towards a Global Agenda on Migration and Development? Evidence from Senegal. Population, Space and Place 19(4): 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, W., and G. Kao. 2001. The Impact of Temporary Labor Migration on Mexican Children's Educational Aspirations and Performance. International Migration Review 35(4): 1205–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, W., and D. S. Massey. 2002. The Culture of Mexican Migration: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Social Forces 80(3): 981–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A., V. Das, and M. Lock (eds.). 1997. Social Suffering. Berkeley, CA: University California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knodel, J., and C. Saengtienchai. 2007. Rural Parents with Urban Children: Social and Economic Implications of Migration for the Rural Elderly in Thailand. Population, Space and Place 13(3): 193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofman, E., and P. Raghuram. 2009. The Implications of Migration for Gender and Care regimes in the South. Social Policy and Development Programme Paper Number 41. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. 18 July 2013:[www.unrisd.org]
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, V. 2000. Arguments Within Geographies of Movement: the Theoretical Potential of Migrants’ Stories. Progress in Human Geography 24(2): 173–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, P., and N. Nyberg‐sørensen. 2004. The Transnational Turn in Migration Studies. Global Commission on International Migration (GCIM), Global Migration Perspectives, No. 6: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn‐ee ho, E., and M. E. Hatfield. 2011. Migration and Everyday Matters: Sociality and Materiality. Population, Space and Place 17(6): 707–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. 2005. Comparative Topographies of Neoliberalism in Mexico. Environment and Planning A 37(2): 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D.S., and M. Aysa. 2005. Social Capital and International Migration from Latin America. Expert group meeting on international migration and development in Latin America and the Caribbean, UN Secretariat, Mexico City.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, V., and D. Schans. 2011. Transnational Families and the Well‐being of Children: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family 73(4): 704–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcevoy, J., P. Petrzelka, C. Radel, and B. Schmook. 2012. Gendered Mobility and Morality in a South‐eastern Mexican Community: Impacts of Male Labour Migration on the Women Left Behind. Mobilities 7(3): 369–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcguire, S., and K. Martin. 2007. Fractured Migrant Families: Paradoxes of Hope and Devastation. Family & Community Health 30(3): 178–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran‐taylor, M. 2008. When Mothers and Fathers Migrate North: Caretakers, Children, and Child Rearing in Guatemala. Latin American Perspectives 35(4): 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., and J. Hyndman. 2006. Feminist Approaches to the Global Intimate. Women's Studies Quarterly 34(½): 446–463.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L., B. Yeoh, and M. Toyota. 2006. Migration and the Well‐being of the ‘Left Behind’ in Asia. Asian Population Studies 2(1): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Designing Qualitative Studies. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods 3: 230–246.
   Google Scholar
• Pina‐delgado, J. 2013. The Current Scheme to Manage Migration Between Europe and Cape Verde: Promoter of Development or Tool for Border Closure? Population, Space and Place 19(4): 404–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popke, J., and R. M. Torres. 2013. Neoliberalization, Transnational Migration, and the Varied Landscape of Economic Subjectivity in the Totonacapan Region of Veracruz. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(1): 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, G., and V. Rosner (eds.). 2012. The Global and the Intimate: Feminism in Our Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raghuram, P. 2009. Which Migration, What Development? Unsettling the Edifice of Migration and Development. Population, Space and Place 15(2): 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. M. 2009. Temporary Migration and Changing Family Dynamics: Implications for Social Development. Population, Space and Place 15(2): 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riosmena, F., and D. Massey. 2012. Pathways to El Norte: Origins, Destinations and Characteristics of Mexican Migrants to the United States. International Migration Review 46(1): 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. M., and H. Schwenken. 2013. Becoming a Migrant at Home: Subjectivation Processes in Migrant‐sending Countries Prior to Departure. Population, Space and Place 19(4): 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvey, R. 2004. Power, Difference and Mobility: Feminist Advances in Migration Studies. Progress in Human Geography 28(4): 490–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeldon, R. 2008. International Migration as a Tool in Development Policy: A Passing Phase? Population and Development Review 34(1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. 2009. On Denationalization as Neoliberalization: Biopolitics, Class Interest and the Incompleteness of Citizenship. Political Power and Social Theory 20: 287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez‐orozco, C., and D. B. Qin. 2006. Gendered Perspectives in Psychology: Immigrant Origin Youth. International Migration Review 40(1): 165–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. 1999. The New Economics of Labour Migration and the Role of Remittances in the Migration Process. International Migration 37(1): 63–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, R. M. 2015. Gendered Costs to the “Left Behind”: A Challenge to the Migration and Development Nexus. In A Handbook of Gender and Development, edited by A. Coles, L. Grey and J. Momsen, 365‐374. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, R. M., and L. Carte. 2013. Community Participatory Appraisal in Migration Research: Connecting Neoliberalism, Rural Restructuring and Mobility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39(1): 140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, R. M., and M. Wicks‐asbun. 2014. Undocumented Students’ Narratives of Liminal Citizenship: High Aspirations, Exclusion and ‘In‐between’ Identities. Professional Geographer 66(2): 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyota, M., B. S. A. Yeoh, and L. Nguyen. 2007. Editorial Introduction: Bringing the ‘Left Behind’ Back into View in Asia: A Framework for Understanding the ‘Migration–Left Behind Nexus’. Population, Space and Place 13(3): 157–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCSD Secretariat. 2012. Migration and Sustainable Development. RIO 2012 Issues Briefs, No. 15. 18 July 2013. [http://www.uncsd2012.org]
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2007. The Impact of International Migration: Children Left Behind in Selected Countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. Global Migration Group. 1 September 2012. [http://www.globalmigrationgroup.org]
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2008. Children and Women Left Behind in Labour Sending Countries: an Appraisal of Social Risks Working Paper. Global Migration Group. 1 September 2012. [http://www.globalmigrationgroup.org]
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., P. Bourgois, and H. M. Loinaz. 2004. Masculinity and Undocumented Labor Migration: Injured Latino Day Laborers in San Francisco. Social Science & Medicine 59(6): 1159–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. 2006. Disposable Women and Other Myths of Global Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, B., and T. Lam. 2007. The Cost of (Im)mobility: Children Left Behind and Children Who Migrate with a Parent. In Perspectives on Gender and Migration, United Nations ESCAP; Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commissions for Asia and the Pacific; 120–149.
   Google Scholar
• Zentgraf, K., and N. Stoltz chinchilla. 2012. Transnational Family Separation: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(2): 345–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zúñiga, V., and R. Hernández‐león. 2005. New Destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar