The Concept of the Firm in Economic Geography

References

• Amin, A. 2000. Organisational learning through communities of practice. Paper prepared for workshop on “Conceptualising the Firm in Economic Geography,” 9–11 March, University of Portsmouth, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., and Cohendet, P. 1999. Learning and adaptation in decentralised business networks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17:87–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald, G. C., ed. 1971. The Theory of the Firm. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. 1994. Industrial districts, inter-firm cooperation and endogenous technological development: The experience of developed countries, In Technological dynamism in industrial districts: An alternative approach to industrialization in developing countries? UNCTAD, 91–142. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. 1996. Industrial districts as “learning regions”: A condition for prosperity European Planning Studies 4:379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. 1997. “Learning regions” in a globalised world economy: Towards a new competitive advantage of industrial districts? In Interdependent and uneven development, global-local perspective, ed. M. Taylor and S. Conti, 143–76. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. 2000. The learning firm in the learning region: Workers participation as social capital. Paper presented at workshop on “Conceptualising the Firm in Economic Geography,” 9–11 March, University of Portsmouth, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. 2001. Learning regions as development coalitions: Partnership as governance in European workfare states Concepts and Transformation. International Journal of Action Research and Organizational Renewal 6:73–101.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., and Isaksen, A. 1997. Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway European Planning Studies 5:299–330.
   Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H-J.; Cooke, P.; and Heidenreich, M., eds. 1998. Regional innovation systems. London and Bristol, Penn.: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G.; Feldman, M.; and Gertler, M., eds. 2000. The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., and Wrigley, N. 1997. Exit, the firm and sunk costs: Reconceptualising the corporate geography of disinvestment and plant closure. Progress in Human Geography 21:338–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. 1937. On the nature of the firm. Economica 4:386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. 1994. Essays on economics and economists. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and Morgan, K. 1994. Growth regions under duress: Renewal strategies in Baden-Württemberg and Emilia-Romagna. In Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe, ed. A. Amin and N. Thrift, 91–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dicken, P., and Thrift, N. 1992. The organization of production and the production of organization: Why business enterprises matter in the study of geographical industrialization. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17:279–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35:1504–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennals, R., and Gustavsen, B. 1999. Work organization and Europe as a development coalition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, Penn.: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 1995. Towards the learning region. Futures 27:527–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., ed. 1997. Resources, firms and strategies. A reader in the resource-based perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, E., and Bamford, J., eds. 1989. Small firms and industrial districts in Italy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., ed. 1993. The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., ed. 2001. Ecologies of creativity. The group, the village and the heterarchic organisation of the British advertising industry. Environment & Planning A 33:351–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1995. The social organization of boards of directors. British Journal of Sociology 46:245–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1974. What kind of geography for what kind of public policy Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 63:18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, B., and Savoie, D. 1995. Regional development theories and their application. New Brunswick, N.J., and London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. 1988. Economics and institutions: A manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 1999. The learning economy, the learning firm and the learning region: A sympathetic critique of the limits to learning. European Urban and Regional Studies 6:59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1995. Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1996. The self-organising economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. Have we ever been modern? Hemel Hempstead, U.K.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W., and O’Sullivan, M. 1996. Sustained economic development, STEP Report, No. 14. Oslo: The STEP Group.
   Google Scholar
• Leborgne, D., and Lipietz, A. 1992. Conceptual fallacies and open questions on post-Fordism. In Pathways to industrialization and regional development, ed. M. Storper and A. Scott, 332–48. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. 1992. Introduction. In National systems of innovation, ed. B.-Å. Lundvall, 1–19. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å., and Johnson, B. 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1(2):23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P. 1997. Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies 5:25–41.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., and Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 1996. Paul Krugman’s geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: A critical assessment. Economic Geography 72:259–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P.; Eskelinen, H.; Hannibalsson, I.; Malmberg, A.; and Vatne, E. 1998. Competitiveness, localised learning and regional development—Specialisation and prosperity in small open economies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1999. Space-time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24:261–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2001. Geography on the agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25:5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P., and Taylor, M. 1982. Industrial organisation and location. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 1997. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies 31:491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 1999. Innovation, learning and industrial organisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23:127–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, P., and Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1999. Enterprise discourse and executive talk: Stories that destabilize the company. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24:11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oinas, P., and van Gils, H. 2001 Forthcoming. Identifying contexts of learning in firms and regions. In Promoting local growth: Process, practice and policy, ed. D. Felsenstein and M. Taylor Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 1999. Editorial: Grey geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24:131–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of firms. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piore, M., and Sabel, C. 1984. The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. New York: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. The economy of instituted process. In Trade and Markets in Early Empires, ed. K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, and H. Pearson, 243–70. New York: Glencoe, Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, J.; Henry, N.; Bryson, J.; and Daniels, P. 2000. Shades of grey? Geographers and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 25:243–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1998. On competition. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour 12:295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pred, A. 1967. Behaviour and location, Part I, Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, No. 27. Lund, Sweden: Department of Geography, Royal University of Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, P., and Scott, M. 1999. Entrepreneurial diversification, business cluster formation, and growth. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17:527–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberger, E. 1994. Corporate strategy and corporate strategists: Power, identity and knowledge with the firm. Environment and Planning A 26:435–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberger, E. 1997. The cultural crisis of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. 1988a. New industrial spaces. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. 1988b. Metropolis: From the division of labor to spatial form. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., and Rosa, P. 1997. New businesses for old: The role of portfolio entrepreneurs in the start-up and growth of businesses. In Small firms, enterprising futures, ed. M. Ram, D. Deakins, and D. Smallbone, 22–33. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Search, P., and Taylor, M. 2001 Forthcoming. Local embeddedness and service firms: Evidence from southern England. In Social capital and the embedded enterprise: International comparisons, ed. M. Taylor and S. Leonard Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, A., and Thomas, H. 1994. Theories of the firm: Implications for strategy research. Journal of Management Studies 31:165–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 1971. Industrial location: An economic geographical analysis. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Soskice, D. 1999. Divergent production regimes. Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, ed. H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, and J. D. Stephens, 101–34. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W., ed. 1971. Organizational growth and development. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, D. 1994. Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1975. Organisation growth, spatial interaction and location decision-making. Regional Studies 9:313–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1984. Industrial geography and the business organisation. In The geography of Australian corporate power, ed. M. Taylor, 1–12. Sydney: Croom Helm Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1995. The business enterprise, power and patterns of geographical industrialisation. In The industrial enterprise and its environment: Spatial perspectives, ed. S. Conti, E. Malecki, and P. Oinas, 99–122. Aldershot, U.K.: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1996. Industrialisation, enterprise power, and environmental change: An exploration of concepts. Environment and Planning A 28:1035–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1999. The small firm as a temporary coalition. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 11:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2000. The firm as a temporary coalition. Paper presented at workshop on “Conceptualising the Firm in Economic Geography,” 9–11 March, University of Portsmouth, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M.; Ekinsmyth, C.; and Leonard, S. 1997. Global-local interdependencies and conflicting spatialities: “Space” and “place” in economic geography. In Interdependent and uneven development: Global-local perspectives, ed. M. Taylor and S. Conti, 57–79. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D., and Pisano, G. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3:537–56.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1995. A hyperactive world. In Geographies of Global Change, ed. R. J. Johnston, P. J. Taylor, and M. Watts, 18–35. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1996. Spatial formations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1998a. Towards a new regional geography. Berichte zur Deurschen Landeskinde, Leipzig 72:37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1998b. The rise of soft capitalism. In An unruly world? Globalization, governance and geography, ed. A. Herod, G. O. Tuathail, and S. Roberts, 25–71. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. 1899. The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. 1989. A requiem for corporate geography. Geografiska Annaler 71B:43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management 5:171–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1983. Organizational innovation: The transaction-cost approach. In Entrepreneurship, ed. J. Ronen, 101–34. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36:269–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, N., and Clark, G. 1997. The spatial configuration of the firm and the management of sunk costs. Economic Geography 73:285–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. 2000. Reconceptualising the firm in new economic geographies: An organisational perspective. Paper presented at workshop on “Conceptualising the Firm in Economic Geography,” 9–11 March, University of Portsmouth, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, S., and DiMaggio, P., eds. 1990. Structures of capital: The organization of the economy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar