Geography and the Immigrant Division of Labor

References

• Alba, R. D.; Logan, J. R.; and Stults, B. J. 2000. The changing neighborhood contexts of the immigrant metropolis. Social Forces 79:587–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba, R.; Logan, J.; Stults, B.; Marzan, G.; and Zhang, W. 1999. Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review 64:446–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., and Turner, E. 1997. The ethnic quilt: Population diversity in southern California. Northridge: California State University, Center for Geographical Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., and Turner, E. 2005. Ethnic residential concentrations in United States metropolitan areas. Geographical Review 95:267–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., and Waldinger, R. 1991. Primary, secondary, and enclave markets: A training systems approach. American Sociological Review 56:432–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, T. J. 1993. Proximity to job opportunities and African American male unemployment: A test of the spatial mismatch hypothesis in Indianapolis. Professional Geographer 45:407–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M., and Wright, R. 1999. The industrial division of labor among immigrants and internal migrants to the Los Angeles economy. International Migration Review 33:26–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, K. V. L. 1993. Suburban pink-collar ghettos: The spatial entrapment of women Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83:225–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R. M. 1994. Race, space, and job accessibility: Evidence from a plant relocation. Economic Geography 70:390–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R. M., and Fernandez-Mateo, I. 2006. Networks, race and hiring. Annual Review of Sociology 71:42–71.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, W. H., and DeVol, R. C. 2000. America’s demography in the new century. Policy Brief No. 9, Milken Institute, Santa Monica, Calif.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S., and Pratt, G. 1995. Gender, work, and space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D. S. 2005. Methods to test the spatial mismatch hypothesis. Economic Geography 81:407–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. 2002. Modeling the probability of niche employment: Exploring workforce segmentation in metropolitan Atlanta. Urban Geography 23:528–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iceland, J. 2004. Beyond black and white: Residential segregation in multiethnic America. Social Science Research 33:248–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K., and Sjoquist, D. 1991. The effect of job access on black and white youth employment: A cross-sectional analysis. Urban Studies 28:255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kain, J. 1968. Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 82:175–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, I.; Bernard, R. B.; and Kim R. 1999. Immigrant incorporation in the garment industry of Los Angeles. International Migration Review 33:5–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, I.; Sabagh, G.; Bozorgmehr, M.; and Der-Martirosian, C. 1994. Beyond the ethnic enclave economy. Social Problems 41:65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R.; Alba, R. D.; and Zhang, W. Q. 2002. Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review 67:299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. 1984. Spatial divisions of labor: Social structures and the geography of production. New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. 1985. Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical and empirical synthesis. Sociology and Social Research 69:315–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mouw, T. 2000. Job relocation and the racial gap in unemployment in Detroit and Chicago, 1980 to 1990. American Sociological Review 65:730–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, V. 2004a. Access to work: The effects of spatial and social accessibility on unemployment for native-born black and immigrant women in Los Angeles. Economic Geography 80:141–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, V. 2004b. The gendered connection between ethnic residential and labor market segregation in Los Angeles. Urban Geography 25:589–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, V. 2005. The geography of immigrant labor markets: Space, networks, and gender. New York: LFB Scholarly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 1989. Reconceptualizing the local labor market: Space, segmentation, and the state. Progress in Human Geography 13:42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and Jensen, L. 1989. The enclave and the entrants: Patterns of ethnic enterprise in Miami before and after Mariel. American Sociological Review 54:929–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and Manning, R. 1986. The immigrant enclave: Theory and empirical examples. In Comparative ethnic relations, ed. S. Olzak and J. Nagel, 47–68. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and Sensenbrenner, J. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology 98:1320–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, V.; McLafferty, S.; and Liu, X. F. 1998. Geographical barriers to employment for American-born and immigrant workers. Urban Studies 35:529–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, S. 1998. The spatial mismatch hypothesis and black youth unemployment: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Journal of Urban Economics 43:79–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J., and Nee, V. 1987. Limits of ethnic solidarity in the enclave economy. American Sociological Review 52:745–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1988. The mobility of labor and capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1995. Immigration and local labor markets. In The economic sociology of immigration, ed. A. Portes, 87–127. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 1989. Metropolis: From the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 1993. Technopolis: High-technology industry and regional development in Southern California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J.A. J. Scott, 1–48. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q. 1998. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low wage workers. Environment and Planning B 15:345–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, W. 1992. Urban structure and the labor market. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, M. 1974. Labor market areas: Uses and definitions. Progress in Planning 2:239–53.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, M. A. 1999. Spatial job search, spatial mismatch, and the employment and wages of racial and ethnic groups in Los Angles. Journal of Urban Economics 46:129–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, M. A. 2005. Geographical skills mismatch, job search, and race. Urban Studies 42:695–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, M. A., and Raphael, S. 2000. Racial differences in spatial job search patterns: Exploring the causes and consequences. Economic Geography 76:201–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, J. 1960. Labor shed, employment field and dynamic analysis in urban geography. Economic Geography 36:189–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R. 1992. Native blacks, new immigrants, and the post-industrial transformation of New York. In Ethnic minorities and industrial change in Europe and North America, ed. M. Cross, 205–25. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R. 1996. Still the promised city? African Americans and new immigrants in postin-dustrial New York. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R., and Bozorgmehr, M. 1996. The making of a multicultural metropolis. In Ethnic Los Angeles, ed. R. Waldinger and M. Bozorgmehr, 3–38. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R., and Der-Martirosian, C. 2001. The immigrant niche: Pervasive, persistent, diverse. In Strangers at the gates: New immigrants in urban America, ed. R. Waldinger, 228–71. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R., and Lichter, M. 2003. How the other half works: Immigration and the social organization of labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. 2004. Labor market concentration of Asian ethnic groups in US metropolitan areas: A disaggregated study. Population Space and Place 10:479–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. 2006. Linking home to work: Ethnic labor market concentration in the San Francisco CMSA. Urban Geography 27(1):72–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, D. 1971. Cities and immigrants: A geography of change in nineteenth-century America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. D. 2003. Ethnic niching and metropolitan labor markets. Social Science Research 32:429–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., and Portes, A. 1980. Immigrant enclaves: An analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami. American Journal of Sociology 86:295–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R., and Ellis, M. 2000. The ethnic and gender division of labor compared among immigrants to Los Angeles. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24:583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R., and Ellis, M. 2001. Immigrants, the native-born, and the changing division of labor in New York City. In New immigrants in New York, ed. N. Foner, 81–110. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., and Logan, J. 1989. Returns on human capital in ethnic enclaves: New York City’s Chinatown. American Sociological Review 54:809–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar