2,739
Views
207
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution

Pages 1-27 | Published online: 22 Oct 2015

References

  • Alexander, G. 2001. Institutions, path dependence, and democratic consolidation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 13:249–70.
  • Arthur, W. B. 1988. Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In The economy as an evolving, complex system, ed. P. Anderson, K. Arrow, and D. Pines, 9–31. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
  • Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and “lock-in” by historical events. Economic Journal 99:116–31.
  • Arthur, W. B. 1994a. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Arthur, W. B. 1994b. Path dependence, self-reinforcement and human learning. In Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy, by W. B. Arthur, 133–58. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Arthur, W. B. 1994c. Industry location patterns and the importance of history. In Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy, by W. B. Arthur, 49–67. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Arthur, W. B. 1994d. Urban systems and historical path dependence. In Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy, by W. B. Arthur, 99–110. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Audia, P. G.; Freeman, J. H.; and Reynolds, P. D. 2006. Organizational foundings in community context: Instruments manufacturers and their interrelationship with other organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 51:381–419.
  • Audretsch, D. B.; Houweling, P.; and Thurik, A. R. 2004. Industry evolution: Diversity, selection and the role of learning. International Small Business Journal 22:331–48.
  • Backhouse, R. 2004. History and equilibrium: A partial defense of equilibrium economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:291–305.
  • Bathelt, H., and Boggs, J. S. 2003. Toward a reconceptualization of regional development paths: Is Leipzig’s media cluster a continuation of or a rupture with the past? Economic Geography 79:265–93.
  • Belussi, F., and Sedita, S. R. 2009. Life cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts. European Planning Studies 17:505–28.
  • Boas, T. C. 2007. Conceptualising continuity and change: The composite-standard model of path dependence. Journal of Theoretical Political Science 19:33–54.
  • Bode, E. 2001. Is regional innovative activity path dependent? An empirical analysis for Germany. Working Paper 1058, Kiel Institute for World Economics, Kiel, Germany.
  • Boschma, R. A. 2004. Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies 38:1001–14.
  • Boschma, R. A., and Frenken, K. 2003. Evolutionary economics and industrial location. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Boschma, R. A., and Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Journal of Economic Geography 6:273–302.
  • Boschma, R., and Martin, R. 2007. Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 7:537–48.
  • Boschma, R., and Van Der Knaap, B. 1997. New technology and windows of locational opportunity. In Economics and evolution, ed. J. Reijnders, 171–202. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Brezis, E. S., and Krugman, P. R. 1997. Technology and the life cycles of cities. Journal of Economic Growth 2:369–83.
  • Carlsson, B. 2007. The role of public policy in emerging clusters. In Cluster genesis: Technology based industrial development, ed. P. Braunerhjelm and M. Feldman, 264–78. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
  • Castaldi, C., and Dosi, G. 2006. The grip of history and the scope for novelty: Some results and open questions on path dependence in economic processes. In Understanding change: Models, methodologies and metaphors, ed. A. Wimmer and R. Kössler, 99–128. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Castellaci, F. 2006. A critical realist interpretation of evolutionary growth theorizing. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30:861–80.
  • Collier, R. B., and Collier, D. 1991. Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Cooke, P., and Morgan, K. 1998. The associational economy. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
  • Corte-Real, M. J. R. 2008. Dynamic competitiveness of industrial clusters in a globalising economy: The case of the Portuguese footwear industry. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
  • Crouch, C., and Farrell, H. 2004. Breaking the path of institutional development? Alternatives to the new determinism. Rationality and Society 16:5–43.
  • David, P. A. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75:332–37.
  • David, P. A. 1986. Understanding the economics of QWERTY: The necessity of history. In Economic History and the Modern Economics, ed. W. N. Parker, 30–49. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
  • David, P. A. 1988. Path dependence: Putting the past into the future of economics. Economic Series Technical Report 533, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
  • David, P. A. 1992. Heros, herds and hysteresis in technological history. Industrial and Corporate Change 1:129–79.
  • David, P. A. 1993a. Path dependence and predictability in dynamic systems with local network externalities: A paradigm for historical economics. In Technology and the wealth of nations, ed. D. Foray and C. Freeman, 187–216. London: Pinter.
  • David, P. A. 1993b. Historical economics in the long run: Some implications of path dependence. In Historical analysis in economics, ed. G. D. Snooks, 29–40. London: Routledge.
  • David, P. A. 1994. Why are institutions the “carriers of history”? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organisations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5:205–20.
  • David, P. A. 2005. Path dependence in economic processes: Implications for policy analysis in dynamical systems contexts. In The evolutionary foundations of economics, ed. K. Dopfer, 151–94. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • David, P. A. 2007. Path dependence and historical social science: An introductory lecture. Paper presented at the Symposium on Twenty Years of Path Dependence and Qwerty-Effects, Russian University–Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 13 May 2005. SIEPR Policy Paper No. 04–022.
  • Endler, J. A., and McLellan, T. 1988. The process of evolution: Towards a new synthesis. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 19:395–421.
  • Foster, J. 2005. The self-organisational perspective on economic evolution: A unifying paradigm. In The evolutionary foundations of economics, ed. K. Dopfer, 367–90. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frenken, K.; Van Oort, F. G.; and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41:685–97.
  • Fuchs, G., and Shapira, P., eds. 2005. Rethinking regional innovation and change: Path dependency or regional breakthrough? New York: Springer.
  • Garnsey, E., and McGlade, J., eds. 2006. Complexity and co-evolution: Continuity and change in socio-economic systems. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Garretsen, H., and Martin, R. L. Forthcoming. Taking history and geography seriously in NEG theory. Spatial Economic Analysis.
  • Garud, R., and Karnøe, P. 2001. Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnøe, 1–38. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gertler, M. 2005. Tacit knowledge, path dependency and local trajectories of growth. In Rethinking regional innovation and change: Path dependency or regional breakthrough? ed. G. Fuchs and P. Shapira, 23–42. New York: Springer.
  • Glasmeier, A. 2000. Manufacturing time: Global competition in the watch industry, 1795–2000. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Grabher, G. 2009. Yet another turn? The evolutionary project in economic geography. Economic Geography 85:119–27.
  • Gunderson, L., and Holling, C. S., eds. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
  • Hacker, J. 2004. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review 98:243–60.
  • Harris, D. J. 2004. Joan Robinson on “history versus equilibrium.” Paper presented at the Joan Robinson Centennial Conference, Department of Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, 17–19 October 2003.
  • Hassink, R. 2005a. How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13:521–35.
  • Hassink, R. 2005b. Geography, networks and renewal in old industrial areas. Paper prepared for the Fourth European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics, Utrecht, 19–21 May.
  • Hassink, R., and Shin, D.-H. 2005. The restructuring of old industrial areas in Europe and Asia. Environment and Planning A 37:571–80.
  • Herrendorf, B.; Valentinyi, A.; and Waldmann, R. 2000. Ruling out multiplicity and indeterminacy: The role of heterogeneity. Review of Economic Studies 67:295–307.
  • Kenney, M., and Von Burg, U. 2001. Paths and regions: The creation and growth of Silicon Valley. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnøe, 127–48. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Klepper, S. 1997. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6:145–82.
  • Klepper, S. 2001. Employee start-ups in high tech industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 11:645–66.
  • Klepper, S. 2007. Disagreements, spinoff, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the US automobile industry. Management Science 53:616–31.
  • Krugman, P. 1996. The self-organizing economy. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
  • Lagerholm, M., and Malmberg, A. 2009. Path dependence in economic geography. In The evolution of path dependence, ed. L. Magnuson, 87–107. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Lang, D., and Setterfield, M. 2006. History versus equilibrium? On the possibility and realist basis of a general critique of traditional equilibrium analysis. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 29:191–209.
  • Library House. 2004. The Cambridge cluster report, 2004. Cambridge, U.K.: Library House.
  • Library House. 2007. Looking inwards, reaching outwards: The Cambridge cluster report, 2007. Cambridge, U.K.: Library House.
  • MacKinnon, D.; Cumbers, A.; Pike, A.; Birch, K.; and McMaster, R. 2009. Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography 85:129–50.
  • Mahoney, J. 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29:507–48.
  • Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
  • Martin, R. L. Forthcoming. The new economic geography: Credible models of the economic landscape? In The Sage companion to economic geography, ed. R. Lee, A. Leyshon, L. McDowell, and P. Sunley. London: Sage.
  • Martin, R. L., and Sunley, P. J. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6:395–438.
  • Martin, R. L., and Sunley, P. J. 2007. Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 7:573–602.
  • Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A. 2007. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Jounal of Economic Geography 7:603–18.
  • Menzel, M.-P., and Fornahl, D. 2007. Cluster life cycles: Dimensions and rationales of cluster development. Jena Economic Research Paper 2007-076, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
  • Metcalfe, J. S. 1998. Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London: Routledge.
  • Metcalfe, J. S.; Foster, J.; and Ramlogan, R. 2006. Adaptive economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30:7–32.
  • Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and innovation in organisations and economies. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
  • North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Page, S. E. 2006. Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1:87–115.
  • Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94:252–67.
  • Popp, A., and Wilson, J. 2007. Life cycles, contingency, and agency: Growth, development and change in English industrial districts and clusters. Environment and Planning A 39:2975–92.
  • Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
  • Schickler, E. 2001. Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Schneiberg, M. 2007. What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review 5:47–80.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • Schwartz, H. 2004. Down the wrong path: Path dependence, increasing returns, and historical institutionalism. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
  • Scott, A. J. 2006. Geography and economy. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
  • Segal Quince Wicksteed. 1985. The Cambridge phenomenon. Cambridge, U.K.: Segal Quince Wicksteed.
  • Segal Quince Wicksteed. 2000. The Cambridge phenomenon revisited. Cambridge, U.K.: Segal Quince Wicksteed.
  • Setterfield, M. 1997. Should economists dispense with the notion of equilibrium? Journal of Keynesian Economics 20:47–76.
  • Simmie, J.; Martin, R.; Carpenter, J.; and Chadwick, A. 2008. History matters: Path dependence and innovation in British city regions. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
  • Stam, E., and Garnsey, E. 2009. Decline and renewal of high-tech clusters: The Cambridge case. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen Business School.
  • Stark, D. 1996. Recombinant property in east European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 101:993–1027.
  • Stark, D., and Bruszt, L. 2001. One way or multiple paths? For a comparative sociology of east European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 106:1129–37.
  • Storper, M. 1995. The resurgence of regions ten years on: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies 2:191–221.
  • Storper, M. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Sydow, J.; Schreyögg, G.; and Koch, J. 2005. Organisational paths: Path dependency and beyond. Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Free University of Berlin.
  • Thelen, K. 2003. How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, ed. J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, 208–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thelen, K. 2004. How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walker, R. 2000. The geography of production. In A companion to economic geography, ed. E. Sheppard and T. Barnes, 113–32. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
  • Wimmer, A., and Kössler, R., eds. 2006. Understanding change: Models, methodologies and metaphors. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Witt, U. 2003. “Lock-in” versus “critical masses”—Industrial change under network externalities. In The evolving economy: Essays on the evolutionary approach to economics, by U. Witt, 115–35. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.