Economic Geographers and the Limelight: Institutions and Policy in the World Development Report 2009

references

• Acemoglu, D., and Johnson, S. H. 2006. Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy 113:949–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., and Thomas, D. 1996. The negotiated economy: State and civic institutions in Denmark. Economy and Society 25:255–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39:61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.; Eriksson, R.; and Lindgren, U. 2009. How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography 9:169–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryceson, K.; Gough, K.; Rigg, J.; and Agergaard, J. 2009. Critical commentary: The World Development Report 2009. Urban Studies 46:723–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, R. M., and Buckley, T. D. 2009. Discontent with the World Bank’s excursion into economic geography: Lions and butterflies once more? Environment and Planning A 41:2806–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking away the ladder. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and Morgan, K. 1998. The associational economy: Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and Puga, D. 2005. From sectoral to functional urban specialisation. Journal of Urban Economics 57:343–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and RodrÍguez-Pose, A. 2005. When economists and geographers collide, or the tale of the lions and the butterflies. Environment and Planning A 37:1695–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K.; Van Oort, F. G.; and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41:685–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3:75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., and Wang, H. G. 2005. Aspects of the rural-urban transformation of countries. Journal of Economic Geography 5:23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino S., and McCann, P. 2006. The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy 35:1018–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maringanti, A.; Sheppard, E.; and Zhang, J. 2009. Where is the geography? The World Bank’s WDR 2009. Economic and Political Weekly 44:45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. 1996. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography 72:293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 1999. The new “geographical turn” in economics: Some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23:65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2001. Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25:189–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009. How regions grow: Trends and analysis. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, H. G. 2004. Can we learn anything from economic geography proper? Journal of Economic Geography 4:501–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quehenberger, M. 2000. Ten years after: Eastern Germany’s convergence at a halt? EIB Papers 5:117–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, J.; Bebbington, A.; Gough, K. V.; Bryceson, D. F.; Agergaard, J.; Fold, N.; and Tacoli C. 2009. The World Development Report 2009 “reshapes economic geography”: Geographical reflections. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 34:128–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RodrÍguez-Pose, A., and Gill, N. 2006. How does trade affect regional disparities? World Development 34:1201–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RodrÍguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2006. Better rules or stronger communities? On the social foundations of institutional change and its economic effects. Economic Geography 82:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9:131–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 2009. World Development Report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 9:583–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. 2010. Weltbank (Hrsg.) (2009): Weltentwicklungsbericht 2009. Wirtschaftsgeografie neu gestalten [Review of the World Development Report 2009: Reshaping economic geography]. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 68:231–233.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and Rallet, A. 2005. Proximity and localization. Regional Studies 39:47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigilia, C. 1992. Sviluppo senza autonomia [Development without autonomy]. Bolonga, Italy: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2009. World Development Report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar