Firm Network Position and Corporate Venture Capital Investment

References

• Ahuja, G. (2000). “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study,” Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barringer, B. R., and A. C. Bluedorn (1999). “The Relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal 20(5), 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., C. Phelps, and S. Kotha (2011). “Towards Understanding Who Makes Corporate Venture Capital Investments and Why,” Journal of Business Venturing 26, 153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelas, A. (1951). “Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups,” in The Policy Sciences. Eds. D. Lerner and H. K. Lasswell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Baysinger, B., and H. Butler (1985). Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 1, 101–125.
   Google Scholar
• Baysinger, B., and R. Hoskisson (1990). Academy of Management Review 15(1), 72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D., and H. Ziedonis (2009). “Corporate Venture Capital as a Window on New Technologies: Implications for the Performance of Corporate Investors When Acquiring Startups,” Organization Science 20(2), 329–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizjak, J. M., M. L. Lemmon, and R. J. Whitby (2007). Options Backdating and Board Interlocks, American Finance Association, Meeting Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Z., and I. Macmillan (1993). Corporate Venturing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., and P. C. Foster (2003). “The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology,” Journal of Management 29, 991–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. (1983). “A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm,” Administrative Science Quarterly 28(2), 223–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. (1985). “Managing the New Venture Division: Research Findings and Implications for Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal 6, 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bygrave, W. D. (1987). “Syndicated Investments by Venture Capital Firms: A Networking Perspective,” Journal of Business Venturing 2(2), 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesborough, H. W. (2002). Making Sense of Venture Capital, Harvard Business Review, March.
   Google Scholar
• Colarelli o'connor, G., and M. Rice (2001). “Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms,” California Management Review 43(2), 95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., E. Katz, and H. Menzel (1966). Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs‐Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J., and M. Miles (1999). “Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit of Competitive Advantage,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Spring, 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J., and M. Miles (2007). “The Strategic Use of Corporate Venturing,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(2), 183–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J., and D. Slevin (1991). “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Fall, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F. (1991). “Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network,” Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 583–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G., D. Ireland, S. Floyd, J. Janney, P. Lane, and S. Zahra (2003). “Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Management 29(3), 351–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimaggio, P., and W. Powell (1983). “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48(2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G. (2006). “Corporate Venture Capital: Past Evidence and Future Directions,” in Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Ed. M. Casson, B. Yeung, A. Basu, and N. Wadeson. New York: Oxford University Press, 397–431.
   Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., and M. J. Lenox (2005). “When Do Firms Undertake R&D by Investing in New Ventures?,” Strategic Management Journal 26, 947–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., and M. J. Lenox (2006). “When Does Corporate Venture Capital Investment Create Firm Value,” Journal of Business Venturing 21, 753–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., and J. M. Shaver (2009). “Limitations to Interorganizational Knowledge Acquisition: The Paradox of Corporate Venture Capital,” Strategic Management Journal 30, 1045–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, N. D. (1977). The Rise and Fall of Corporate New Venture Divisions. New York: UMI Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). “Centrality in Social Networks: I. Conceptual Clarification,” Social Networks 1, 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical.
   Google Scholar
• Gompers, P. A. (2002). “Corporations and the Financing of Innovation: The Corporate Venturing Experience,” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 87(4), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic Action, Social Structure, and Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, P. G., C. G. Brush, and M. Hart (1999). “The Corporate Venture Champion: A Resource‐Based Approach to Role and Process,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23(3), 103.
   Google Scholar
• Guth, W. D., and A. Ginsberg (1990). “Guest Editor's Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship,” Strategic Management Journal 11, 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunschild, R. R. (1993). “Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity,” Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 564–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunschild, R. R., and C. M. Beckman (1998). “When Do Interlocks Matter? Alternative Sources of Information and Interlock Influence,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43, 815–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, E. M. (2011). The Rise of the European Corporate Elite: evidence from the Network of Interlocking Directorates in 2005 and 2010, Paper 34, http://opensiuc.lib.edu/pnconfs_2011/34.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, G., G. T. Lumpkin, and R. P. Singh (1997). Opportunity Recognition: Perceptions and Behaviors of Entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R., M. Hitt, and C. Hill (1993). Organization Science 4(2), 325–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, E. R. (1985). The Change Masters. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, T. (2002). External Corporate Venturing: Strategic Renewal in Rapidly Changing Industries. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, T. (2004). “Building External Corporate Venturing Capability,” Journal of Management Studies 41(5), 799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, T., M. Maula, and C. Wilson (2010). “Unique Resources of Corporate Venture Capitalists as a Key Entry into Rigid Venture Capital Syndication Networks,” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice January, 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kentor, J., A. Sobek, and M. Timberlake (2011). “Interlocking Corporate Directorates and the Global City Hierarchy,” American Sociological Association XVII(2), 498–514.
   Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1995). “Entrepreneurial Opportunities in an Entrepreneurial Firm: A Structural Approach,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Spring, 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Lorsch, J. W. (1989). Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. Boston: HBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G., and G. Dess (1996). “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance,” Academy of Management Review 21(1), 135–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, R., Y. Huang, and O. Shenkar (2011). “Social Networks and Opportunity Recognition: A Cultural Comparison between Taiwan and the United States,” Strategic Management Journal 32(11), 1183–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston, MA: HBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maula, M., E. Autio, and G. Murray (2009). “Corporate Venture Capital and the Balance of Risks and Rewards for Portfolio Companies,” Journal of Business Venturing 24, 274–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1967). “The Small World Problem,” Psychology Today 2, 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). “Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms,” Management Science 29(7), 770–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). “What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research in Interlocking Directorates,” Annual Review of Sociology 22, 271–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., and N. S. Contractor (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozgen, E., and R. A. Baron (2007). “Social Sources of Information in Opportunity Recognition: Effects of Mentors, Industry Networks, and Professional Forums,” Journal of Business Venturing 22(2), 174–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. A., P. D. Jennings, and X. Zhou (1993). “Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts,” Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 100–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith‐doerr (1996). “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 116–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahaym, A., K. Steensma, and J. Barden (2010). “The Influence of R&D Investment on the Use of Corporate Venture Capital: An Industry‐Level Analysis,” Journal of Business Venturing 25, 376–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildt, H. A., M. V. Maula, and T. Keil (2005). “Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29, 493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman (2000). “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research,” Academy of Management Review 25(1), 217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. C., D. Ketchen, C. Shook, and D. Ireland (2010). “The Concepts of ‘Opportunity’ in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges,” Journal of Management, 36(1), 40–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shropshire, C. (2010). “The Role of the Interlocking Director and Board Receptivity in the Diffusion of Practices,” Academy of Management Review 35(2), 246–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R. P., G. E. Hills, R. C. Hybels, and G. T. Lumpkin (1999). Opportunity Recognition through Social Networks of Entrepreneurs, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 228–241.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., and D. Gumpert (1985). “The Heart of Entrepreneurship,” Harvard Business Review March–April, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, H. B. (1990). “Corporate Venture Capital: Strategies for Success,” Journal of Business Venturing 5, 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Useem, M. (1984). The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1996). “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect,” American Sociological Review 61(4), 674–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. (2005). “Network Models and Methods for Studying the Diffusion of Innovations, Models and Methods,” in Social Network Analysis. Eds. P. J. Carrington, J. Scott and S. Wasserman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vesper, K. H. (1980). New Venture Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhwa, A., and S. Kotha (2006). “Knowledge Creation through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry,” Academy of Management Journal 49(4), 819–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz (1998). “Collective Dynamics of Small‐World Networks,” Nature 363, 202–204.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. (1996). “Governance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities,” Academy of Management Journal 39, 1713–1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and J. Covin (1995). “Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship‐Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis,” Journal of Business Venturing 10, 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and D. Garvis (2000). “International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility,” Journal of Business Venturing 15(5,6), 469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., D. Jennings, and D. Kuratko (1999). “The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm‐Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Development Winter, 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., D. O. Neubaum, and M. Huse (2000). “Entrepreneurship in Medium‐Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems,” Journal of Management. 26, 947–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar