Early‐Stage of Innovations: Selection System Criteria for Funding U.S. Biotech SMEs

References

• Alegre, J., K. Sengupta, and R. Lapiedra (2011). “Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance in a High‐Tech SMEs Industry,” International Small Business Journal 32(4), 454–470.
   Google Scholar
• Allarakhia, M., and S. Walsh (2011). “Managing Knowledge Assets Under Conditions of Radical Change: The Case of the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Technovation 31(2–3), 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astebro, T., and J. L. Michela (2005). “Predictors of the Survival of Innovations,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 22, 322–335.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., and D. Castro (2009). “A National Technology Agenda for the New Administration,” Yale Journal of Law & Technology 11(1), 190–208.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, P. E., and L. M. Branscomb (2003). “Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States,” Journal of Technology Transfer 28, 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, J., F. C. Wezel, and J. Koo (2011). “Cross‐Cutting Ties, Organizational Density, and New Firm Formation in the U.S. Biotech Industry, 1994‐1998,” Academy of Management Journal 54(2), 295–311.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S. (1997). “National Systems of Biotechnology Innovation: Complex Interdependence in the Global System,” Journal of International Business Studies 28(2), 241–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendis, R., and M. Rohrbaugh (2012). “What Is a Biotech Innovation Ecosystem and How Is It Supposed to Work?” Presentation at Technology Transfer Society, Washington, DC, May 9, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, D. J. (2002). “Matching Technology Push to Market Pull: Strategic Choices and the Academic Spinout Firm,” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 2(4–5), 339–353.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, C., and J. Suret (2010). “Entrepreneurial Equity Financing and Securities Regulation: An Empirical Analysis,” International Small Business Journal 30(1), 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Certo, S. T. (2003). “Influencing Initial Public Offering Investors with Prestige: Signaling with Board Structures,” The Academy of Management Review 28(3), 432–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, G. H., and E. Jansen (1992). “The Founder's Self‐Assessed Competence and Venture Performance,” Journal of Business Venturing 7, 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, G. H., and S. H. Hanks (1994). “Founder Competence, the Environment, and Venture Performance,” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 18(3), 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. D., and T. J. Dean (2005). “Information Asymmetry and Investor Valuation of IPOS: Top Management Team Legitimacy as a Capital Market Signal,” Strategic Management Journal 26, 683–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2002). “Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters,” Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. (1997). “Fixing the Fuzzy Front End of the New Product Process,” CMA Magazine, 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• D'aventi, R. A. (1990). “Managerial Prestige and Organizational Bankruptcy,” Organization Science 1(3), 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (1991). From Invention to Innovation: Commercialization of New Technology by Independent and Small Business Inventors. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, M., and J. Eliashberg (2002). “Structuring the New Product Development Pipeline,” Management Science 48(3), 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, M. J., P. A. Golden, and T. Saxton (1997). “The Effect of Reputation on the Decision to Joint Venture,” Strategic Management Journal 18, 127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbers, J. J., and N. M. Wijnberg (2012). “Nascent Ventures Competing for Start‐Up Capital: Matching Reputations and Investors,” Journal of Business Venturing 27, 372–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erden, Z., D. Klang, R. Sydler, and G. Von krogh (2013). “How Can We Signal the Value of Our Knowledge? Knowledge‐Based Reputation and Its Impact on Firm Performance in Science‐Based Industries,” Long Range Planning 48, 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff (2000). “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University‐Industry‐Government Relations,” Research Policy 29, 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., and R. Reuber (2007). “The Good, the Bad, the Unfamiliar: The Challenges of Reputations Formation Facing New Firms,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(1), 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley (1990). “What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy,” Academy of Management Journal 33(2), 223–257.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, C., C. Sink, L. Mynatt, R. Rogers, and A. Rappazzo (1996). “Surviving the ‘Valley of Death': A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Technology Transfer 21(1–2), 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (1992). “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources,” Strategic Management Journal 13, 135–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. C., and R. Gulati (2006). “Stacking the Deck: The Effects of Top Management Background on Investor Decisions,” Strategic Management Journal 27, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, J., and R. Miller (2011). “What Investors Look for, the Differences Between Angel and VC Deals, Stages of Funding, and the Valley of Death,” Federal Lab Consortium Conference – Commercializing Innovation: Attracting Investors and Entrepreneurs, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Khilji, S., T. Mroczkowski, and B. Bernstein (2006). “From Invention to Innovation: Toward Developing an Integrated Innovation Model for Biotech Firms,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 23, 528–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana, A., and S. R. Rosenthal (1997, Winter). “Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development,” Sloan Management Review, 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, B. A., J. D. Linton, and S. T. Walsh (2013). “Neo‐Marshellian Equilibrium Versus Schumpeterian Creative Destruction: Its Impact on Business Research and Economic Policy,” Journal of Small Business Management 51(2), 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, T. (2002). “Economic Selection Theory,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 443–470.
   Google Scholar
• Kobe, K. (2012). Small Business GDP: Update 2002‐1010. Small Business Research Summary, 390. Retrieved January 28, 2013, retrieved from www.sba.gov/advocacy.
   Google Scholar
• Koen, P., G. Ajamian, R. Burkart, A. Clamen, J. Davidson, R. D'amore, C. Elkins, K. Herald, M. Incorvia, A. Johnson, R. Karol, R. Siebert, A. Slavejkov, and K. Wagner (2001). “Providing Clarity and a Common Language to the ‘Fuzzy Front End',” Research Technology Management 44(2), 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Landström, H. (1995). “A Pilot Study on the Investment Decision‐Making Behavior of Informal Investors in Sweden,” Journal of Small Business Management 33(3), 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, R. H., S. T. Certo, C. M. Dalton, D. R. Dalton, and A. A. Cannella (2006). “Initial Public Offering Investor Valuations: An Examination of Top Management Team Prestige and Environmental Uncertainty,” Journal of Small Business Management 44(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz (1998). “The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies,” Science and Public Policy 25(3), 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., and N. Vonortas (2009). Innovation Networks in Industries. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, S. K. (2002). “Moving Technologies from Lab to Market,” Research Technology Management 45(6), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, B. D. (1995). “Obsolescence of Core Competencies versus Corporation Renewal,” Technology Management 2(2), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1988). “The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property,” ISIS 79(4), 606–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts (1986). “Relying on the Information of Interested Parties,” Rand Journal of Economics 17, 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milken Institute‐FasterCures (2011). Crossing Over the Valley of Death. Retrieved January 21, 2013, retrieved from http://www.fastercures.org/Publications/Translational-VOD.php
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelmore, S., and J. Rowley (2010). “Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Literature Review and Development Agenda,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 16(2), 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Moenaert, R. K., A. De Meyer, W. E. Souder, and D. Deschoolmeester (1995). “R&D/Marketing Communicating During the Fuzzy Front‐End,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42(3), 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, J. M., and N. M. Wijnberg (2010). “From Resources to Value and Back: Competition Between and Within Organizations,” British Journal of Management 22(1), 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Paugh, J., and J. C. Lafrance (1997). Meeting the Challenge, U.S. Industry Faces the 21st Century: The U.S. Biotechnology Industry. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pfarrer, M. D., T. G. Pollock, and V. P. Rindova (2010). “A Tale of Two Assets: The Effects of Firm Reputation and Celebrity on Earnings Surprises and Investors’ Reactions,” Academy of Management Journal 53, 1131–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M. (1993). “A Status‐Based Model of Market Competition,” American Journal of Sociology 98(4), 829–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, T. G., P. M. Lee, K. Jin, and K. Lashley (2015). “(Un)Tangled: Exploring the Asymmetric Coevolution of New Venture Capital Firms’ Reputation and Status,” Administrative Science Quarterly 60(3), 482–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portilla, L. (2011). “Technology Development/Transfer Opportunities: Working with Federal Laboratories,” National Institutes of Health. Federal Lab Consortium Conference – Commercializing Innovation: Attracting Investors and Entrepreneurs, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith‐doerr (1996). “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus on Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1), 116–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. E., and U. de Brentani (2004). “The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management 21, 170–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinertsen, D. G. (1999). “Taking the Fuzziness Out of the Fuzzy Front End,” Research Technology Management 42(6), 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuber, A. R., and E. Fischer (2005). “The Company You Keep: How Young Firms in Different Competitive Contexts Signal Reputation Through Their Customers,” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 29(1), 57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., and C. J. Fombrun (1999). “Constructing Competitive Advantage: The Role of Firm‐Constituent Interactions,” Strategic Management Journal 20, 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., A. P. Petkova, and S. Kotha (2007). “Standing Out: How New Firms in Emerging Markets Build Reputation,” Strategic Organization 5, 31–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., T. G. Pollock, and M. L. A. Hayward (2006). “Celebrity Firms: The Social Construction of Market Popularity,” Academy of Management Review 31, 50–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., and D. Deeds (2004). “Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal 25, 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scales, T. W. (2011). “A Booming Economy,” Journal of Applied Business and Economics 12(3), 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonmaker, M. (2011). Pipeline‐to‐Partnerships – Phase 1 Research Results. (Unpublished paper). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Business, Department of Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonmaker, M., E. Carayannis, and P. Rau (2013). “The Role of Marketing Activities in the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: A Study of the Biotech Industry (Phase 1),” Journal of Technology Transfer 38, 850–872.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonmaker, M. G., and P. A. Rau (2014). “The Role of Marketing Activities in the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: A Study of Small‐ to Medium‐Size Enterprises in the Biotech Industry,” Journal of Medical Marketing 14(1), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and D. Cable (2002). “Network Ties, Reputation, and Financing of New Ventures,” Management Science 48(3), 364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sine, W. D., S. Shane, and D. Di Gregorio (2003). “The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions,” Management Science 49(4), 478–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small Business Administration (2009). Innovation in Small Businesses: Drivers of Change and Value Use. Retrieved November 22, 2015, retrieved from www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/rs342tot_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Small Business Administration (2011). What's SBA's Definition of a Small Business Concern? Retrieved September 4, 2011, retrieved from http://www.sba.gov/content/what-sbas-definition-small-business-concern
   Google Scholar
• Stremersch, S., and W. Van Dyck (2009). “Marketing of the Life Sciences: A New Framework and Research Agenda for a Nascent Field,” Journal of Marketing 73, 4–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T., H. Hoang, and R. C. Hybels (1999). “Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2), 315–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, R., W. Hermina, and S. Walsh (2013). “The Pharmaceutical Technology Landscape: A New Form of Technology Roadmapping,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80, 191–211.
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (2015). Innovation Strategy. Retrieved November 14, 2015, retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/innovation/innovation-imperative.htm
   Google Scholar
• Weigelt, K., and C. Camerer (1988). “Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications,” Strategic Management Journal 9, 443–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnberg, N. M. (2004). “Innovation and Organization: Value and Competition in Selection Systems,” Organization Studies 25, 1413–1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnberg, N. M. (2011). “Classification Systems and Selection Systems: The Risks of Radical Innovation and Category Spanning,” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27, 297–306.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnberg, N. M., and G. Gemser (2000). “Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts,” Organization Science 11(3), 323–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar