Typology of Spaces and Topology of Toleration: City, Pluralism, Ownership

REFERENCES

• Atkinson, R., & Blandy, S. (Eds.). (2006). Gated communities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2006). Property and no-property. Houston Law Review, 42, 1425–1449.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (1994). Ethical land use. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, L. C. (1977). Property rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, W. (1766). Commentaries on the laws of England. Repr. (2002), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2004). Unsettling the city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2009). Homelessness, rights and the delusions of property. Urban Geography, 30, 577–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunetta, G., & Moroni, S. (2008). Libertà e istituzioni nella città volontaria. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetta, G., & Moroni, S. (2012). Contractual communities in the self-organizing city. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica 32: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1968). The demand and supply of public goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Chadderdon, L. J. (2006). No political speech allowed: Common interest developments, homeowners associations, and restrictions on free speech. Journal of Land Use, 21, 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Crees, J. C. (2009). The right and wrong ways to sell a public forum. Iowa Law Review, 94, 1419–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Levine, M., & McAuley, R. (2006). Locating impropriety: Street drinking, moral order and the ideological dilemma of public space. Political Psychology, 27, 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. (1993). Property in land. Yale Law Journal, 102, 1315–1400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. (1996). Controlling chronic misconduct in city spaces: On panhandlers, skid rows and public-space zoning. Yale Law Journal, 105, 1665–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. E., Rose, C. M., & Ackerman, B. A. (2002). Perspectives on property Law. New York: Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foldvary, F. (1994). Public goods and private communities. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Foldvary, F. (2001). The completely decentralized city: The case for benefits based public finance. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60, 403–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzese, P. A., & Siegel, S. (2008). The Twin Rivers case: Of homeowners associations, free speech rights and privatized mini-governments. Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy, 5, 729–768.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, A. (2002). Toleration as recognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geisler, C., & Daneker, G. (Eds.). (2000). Property and values: Alternatives to public and private ownership. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G. (2003). Private neighbourhoods as club economies and shareholder democracies. Belgeo 1, 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G. (2006). Some reflections on the economic and political organisation of private neighbourhoods. In R. Atkinson & S. Blandy (Eds.), Gated communities (pp. 34–46). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., Webster, C., & Frantz, K. (2006). Introduction. In G. Glasze, C. Webster, & K. Frantz (Eds), Private cities: Global and local perspectives (pp. 1–8). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krueckenberg, D. A. (1995). The difficult character of property: To whom do things belong? Journal of the American Planning Association, 61, 301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenson, P., & Collins, D. (2007). Beyond punitive regulation? Antipode, 39, 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Webster, C. (2006). Enclosure of the urban commons. GeoJournal, 66(1–2): 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lottieri, C. (2010). Usi civici e città volontaria. In C. Lottieri (Ed.), Dalle vicinie al federalismo (pp. 47–93). Pordenone, Italy: Associazione Carlo Cattaneo.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, K. E., & Larson-Keagy, E. M. (2005). These white walls: The dialectic of retirement communities. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 241–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, C. (2006). Toleration: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., Durrett, C., & Hertzman E. (2011). Cohousing: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendus, S. (2009). Introduction. In S. Mendus (Ed.), Justifying toleration: Conceptual and historical perspectives (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. J. (2002). Two forms of toleration: Tolerance in public and personal life. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33, 548–562.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public Space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 108–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (1997). The annihilation of space by law: The root and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. Antipode, 29, 303–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S., & Chiodelli, F. (2013). Pluralism in private spaces: homeowners associations, clubs, shopping malls. In S. Moroni, & D. Weberman (Eds), Space and Pluralism. Budapest: Central University Press (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Munzer, S. R. (1990). A theory of property. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2006). Planning, law and economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. H. (2005). Private neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, S. (1985). Cities and services: The geography of collective consumption. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, F. J. (1979). Ownership: The hidden factor in land use regulation. In R. L. Andrews (Ed.), Land in America (pp. 129–135). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. (1980). Distribution, allocation, social structure and spatial form: Elements of planning theory. Progress in Planning, 14, 227–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, D. D. (1988). The intolerable. In S. Mendus (Ed.), Justifying toleration (pp. 137–153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, D. B., & Den Uyl, D. (2005). Norms of liberty. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. (1992). Place, modernity, and the consumer’s world. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, E. J. (2005). Public access in shopping centers. In International Council of Shopping Centers (Ed.), Guide to union and public access in shopping centers (pp. 15–43). New York: International Council of Shopping Centers.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditures. The Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 387–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditures. The Review of Economics and Statistics 37, 350–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1958). Aspects of public expenditure theories. The Review of Economics and Statistics 40, 332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazama, G. W. (2000). Lessons from the history of affordable housing cooperatives in the United States. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59, 573–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (2004). Tolerance, liberalism and the problem of boundaries. Society, 41(2), 12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, B. (2009). Boundaries of order. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. W. (2008). Things we would like to take for granted: Minimum standards for the legal framework of a free and democratic society. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 2, 139–159.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Low, S. (2006). Introduction: The imperative of public space. In S. Low & N. Smith (Eds.), The politics of public space (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L. A., & Mitchell, D. (2006). USA’s destiny? Regulating space and creating community in American shopping malls. Urban Studies, 43, 977–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L. A., & Mitchell, D. (2008). The people’s property? Power, politics and the public. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz, L. J. (2006). Exclusionary amenities in residential communities. Virginia Law Review, 92, 437–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, R. (1988). Scepticism and toleration in the seventeenth century. In S. Mendus (Ed.), Justifying toleration: Conceptual and historical perspectives (pp. 21–35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underkuffler, L. S. (2003). The idea of property. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1993). Liberal rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. (2001). Gated cities of to-morrow. Town Planning Review 72: 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: gates, green belts, and gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B, 29, 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. (2007). Property rights, public space and urban design. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C., & Lai, L. W. C. (2003). Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar