Designing Proper Fiscal Arrangements for Sub-Local Decentralization in Montreal

REFERENCES

• Bäck, H., Gjelstrup, G., Helgesen, M., Johansson, F., & Klausen, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Urban political decentralization: Six Scandinavian cities. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, S., & Marando, V. (2001). The subdistricting of cities: Applying the polycentric model. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 721–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, R. (2001). Rationales and forms of decentralization. In R. Bird & Stauffer (Eds.), Intergovernmental fiscal relations in fragmented societies (pp. 1–13). Fribourg, Switzerland: Institute of Federalism.
   Google Scholar
• Bish, R. L., & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding urban government: Metropolitan reform reconsidered. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J.-A., Hamel, P., Jouve, B., & Keil, R. (2006). Comparing metropolitan governance: The cases of Montreal and Toronto. Progress in Planning, 66, 7–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2002). Decoding the newest “metropolitan regionalism” in the USA: A critical overview. Cities, 19, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, J.-P., & Robertson, M. (2005). The borough system of consolidated Montreal: Revisiting urban governance in a composite metropolis. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27, 307–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry, D., & Stoker, G. (2002). New localism: Refashioning the centre-local relationship. London: New Local Government Network (NLGN).
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., & Tufte, E. (1973). Size and democracy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delorme, P. (2009). Une île, une ville: Réunification ratée et complexification administrative. In P. Delorme (Ed.), Montréal aujourd’hui et demain: Politique, urbanisme, tourisme (pp. 15–40). Montreal: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Garcea, J., & LeSage E. (Eds.). (2008). Local government reform: A comparative analysis of advanced Anglo-American countries. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Kortt, M., & Grant, B. (2011). A normative model for local government de-amalgamation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 46, 601–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., & Aars, J. (2007). Tensions and cooperation in a multilevel system: Integrating district councils in city government in Bergen. Local Government Studies, 33, 677–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcea, J., & LeSage, E. (2005). Municipal reform in Canada: Reconfiguration, re-empowerment and rebalancing. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacek, M., & Grabner, A. (2013). Local sub-decentralization and sub-municipal divisions in Slovenia. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 13, 213–230.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, P. J. (2009). Services centraux, services en trop: La dérive centrifuge des arrondissements de Montréal. In L. Bherer & G. Sénécal (Eds.), La métropolisation et ses territoires (pp. 157–175). Montreal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, P., & Rousseau, J. (2006). Revisiting municipal reforms in Quebec and the new responsibilities of local actors in a globalizing world. In R. Young & C. Leuprecht (Eds.), Canada: The state of the federation 2004: Municipal-federal-provincial relations in Canada (pp. 139–160). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K., Miller, D. Y., & Paytas, J. (2004). Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 147–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (2005). Metropolitan governance, democracy and the dynamics of place. In H. Heinelt & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 8–28). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R., Jimenez, B., & Lal, K. (2011). Does local government fragmentation reduce local spending? Urban Affairs Review, 47, 467–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illsley, B., & Coles, E. (2009). Putting communities in control: A Scottish perspective. Planning Practice and Research, 24, 363–378.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. S., & Hendrick, R. (2010). Is government consolidation the answer? State and Local Government Review, 42, 258–270.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P. (2008). Varieties of city regionalism and the quest for political cooperation: A comparative perspective. Urban Research and Practice, 1(2), 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Latendresse, A. (2005). Municipal reform and public participation in Montreal’s urban affairs: Break or continuity? In P. Booth & B. Jouve (Eds.), Metropolitan democracies: Transformations of the state and urban policy in Canada, France and Great Britain (pp. 117–132). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Litvak, J., Ahmad, J., & Bird, R. (1998), Rethinking decentralization at the World Bank. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lõhmus, M. (2008). Local autonomy and territorial decentralisation in capital cities. Halduskultuur, 9, 60–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance. Public Administration, 86, 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Searle, B. (2007). Fiscal equalization: Challenges in the design of intergovernmental transfers. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meloche, J.-P., & Vaillancourt, F. (2012). Le financement des arrondissements de la Ville de Montréal: Constats, principes et options. Rapport de projet 2012RP–11. Montréal: Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations (CIRANO).
   Google Scholar
• Meloche, J.-P., Vaillancourt, F., & Yilmaz, S. (2004). Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? Policy Research Working Paper 3254. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morçol, G., Hoyt, L., Meek, J. W., & Zimmermann, U. (Eds.). (2008). Business improvement districts: Research, theories and controversies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (2001). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 557–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Ostaaijen, J., Gianoli, A., & Coulson, A. (2012). The added value of intra-municipal decentralisation: Comparing Bologna, Rotterdam, and Birmingham. In L. Schaap & H. Daemen (Eds.), Renewal in European local democracies (pp. 145–163). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Parks, R. B. (1999). Neither Gargantua nor the land of Lilliput: Conjectures on mixed systems of metropolitan organization. In M. D. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis (pp. 284–305). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Bish, R., & Ostrom, E. (1988). Local government in the United States. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., & Oakerson, R. J. (2000). Regionalism, localism, and metropolitan governance: Suggestions from the research program on local public economies. State and Local Government Review, 32, 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett, L. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the “ new localism.” Political Studies, 52, 358–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röber, M., & Schröter, E. (2007). Governing the capital: Comparing institutional reform in Berlin, London and Paris. In R. Hambleton & J. Gross (Eds.), Governing cities in a global era: Competition, innovation, and democratic reform (pp. 33–43). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robotti, L., & Dollery, B. (2009). Structural reform, revenue adequacy and optimal tax assignments in local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 3, 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. S., Boothe, P., Dahlby, B., & Smith, R. S. (1999). Public finance in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentraub, M. S., & al Habil, W. (2009). Why metropolitan governance is growing, as is the need for elastic governments. In D. Phares (Ed.), Governing metropolitan regions in the 21st century (pp. 39–53). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. (2008). The limits of boundaries: Why city-regions cannot be self-governing. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H., & Vogel, R. K. (2009). Regionalism and urban politics. In J. Davies, D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (2nd edition, pp. 106–124). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2012). Grant financing of metropolitan areas: A review of principles and worldwide practices. Policy Research Working Paper 6002. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, E., & Bird, R. M. (2012). Merging municipalities: Is bigger better? In A. Moisio (Ed.), Rethinking local government: Essays on municipal reform (pp. 83–130). Helsinki: VATT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2004). New localism, progressive politics and democracy. The Political Quarterly, 75, 117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanstrom, T. (2006). Regionalism, equality and democracy. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P. (2013). Intra-municipal units in urban political systems in Poland: Vicious round-about of marginalization or dead-end street? Paper prepared for Annual EURA conference, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M. (2012). Exploring the metropolitan trap: The case of Montreal. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 554–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent P. (2012) The merger delusion: How swallowing its suburbs made an even bigger mess of Montreal. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, D., & Dierickx, G. (2007). The decentralisation of city government and the restoration of political trust. Local Government Studies, 33, 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar