Regional Partnerships and Metropolitan Economic Development

REFERENCES

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, O. J. (2011). Balancing efficiency, effectiveness and democracy in organizing inter-municipal partnerships: Conflicting aims? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, O. J., & Pierre, J. (2010). Exploring the strategic region: Rationality, context, and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 46, 218–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A., & Hawkins, C. V. (2012). Regional cooperation and multilateral agreements in the provision of public safety. American Review of Public Administration, 43, 460–475. doi:10.1177/0275074012447676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arminger, G., & Muller, F. (1990). Lineare Modelle zur Analyse von Paneldaten. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Barltee, D., & Steele, J. (1998, November 9). Corporate welfare. Time, 152(19), 36–54.
   Google Scholar
• Basher, S. A., & Lagerlof, N. (2006). Geography, population density, and per-capita income gaps across US states and Canadian provinces (MPRA Paper No. 369). Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/369/
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, M. L., & Rolnick, A. J. (1995). Congress should end the economic war among the states. In Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota 1994 Annual Report. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Carr. J. B., Bae, S., & Lu, W. 2006. City-county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review, 38, 259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E. (1985). The political economy of federalism. American Political Science Review. 79, 994–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. E., & Saiz, M. R. (1996). Economic development and infrastructure policy. In V. Gray & H. Jacob (Eds.), Politics in the American states (6th ed., (pp. 516–548). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clingermayer, J., & Feiock, R. C. (2001). Institutional constraints and policy choice: An exploration of local governance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, B. P. (1992). Tug Hill, New York: Progress through cooperation in a rural region. National Civic Review, 81, 449–465.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, E. F. (1974). Accounting for United States economic growth, 1929–1969. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, T. R. (1964). Urban political integration: Conditions associated with annexation in American cities. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 8, 430–446.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. (1998). The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, U., & Reinecke, J. (1994). Panelanalyse. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2002). A quasi-market framework for development competition. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24: 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2004).Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29, 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41, 397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., & Park, H. J. (2012) Administrators and elected officials’ collaboration networks: Selecting partners to reduce risk in economic development. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Moon, J., & Park, H. J. (2008). Is the world “flat” or “spiky”? Rethinking the governance implications of globalization for economic development. Public Administration Review, 68, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. (Ed.). (2010). Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Steinacker, A., & Park, H. J. (2009). Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review, 69, 256–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Tao, J., & Johnson, L. (2004). Regionalism and institutional collective action. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florestano, P. S., & Wilson-Gentry, L. (1994). The acceptability of regionalism in solving state and local problems. SPECTRUM: The Journal of State Government, 67, 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Friesema, H. P. (1979). Interjurisdictional agreements in metropolitan areas. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 242–252
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, V. (2007). Partners or competitors? Perceptions of regional economic development cooperation in Illinois. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, G., & Fleischmann, A. (1991). Promoting economic development: A comparison of central cities, suburbs, and nonmetropolitan communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2011). Econometric analysis (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstone, M., & Moretti, E. (2003). Bidding for industrial plants: Does winning a “million dollar plant” increase welfare?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, J., & Gappert, G. (1993). The new civic infrastructure: Intersectoral collaboration and the decision-making process. National Civic Review, 82, 140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. V. (2009). Prospects for and barriers to local government joint ventures. State and Local Government Review, 41, 108–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. V. (2010). Competition and cooperation: Local government joint ventures for economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 253–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. V., & Andrew, S. (2011). Understanding horizontal and vertical relations in the context of economic development joint venture agreements. Urban Affairs Review, 47, 385–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. (1985). Industrialization and urbanization: International experience. Background paper prepared for the working group on Population Growth and Economic Development, Committee on Population, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberg, T. (1996). Regional cooperation: Strategies and incentives for global competitiveness and urban reform. National Civic Review, 85(2), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberg, T., Magidson, P., & Wernecke, M.L. (1992). Promoting regional cooperation in southeastern Pennsylvania. National Civic Review, 81, 418–434.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2000). Multilevel analyses of grouped and longitudinal data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabe, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data (pp. 15–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (1986) Analysis of panel data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, M. (1992). Momentum 21: Regional cooperation in the Chippewa Valley. National Civic Review, 81, 435–448.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., & Neiman, M. (2004). Courting business: Competition for economic development among cities. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation (pp 124–146). Washington. DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. W., Feiock, R. C., & Bae, J. (2014). The roles of regional organizations in interlocal resource exchange: Complement or substitute? American Review of Public Administration, 44, 339–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. W., & Park, H. J. (2007). Choosing sides: Formation of regional partnership for economic development in metropolitan area and landscape theory of aggregation. International Review of Public Administration, 12, 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Schneider, M., Scholz, J., & Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 148–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. E., Lowery, D., & DeHoog, R. H. (1992). The politics of dissatisfaction: Citizens, services and urban institutions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Manzato, G. G., Arentzeb, T. A., Timmermansc, H. J. P., & Ettemad, D. (2010). Location and accessibility mediated influences on office firm closure rates: A proportional hazard model. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 14, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, B. C., & Feiock, R. C. (2005). Bested levels of institutions: State rules and city property taxes. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 634–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2000). Collaborative policy making and administration: The operational demands of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 278–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olberding, J. C. (1997, October). Regional alliances for economic development: Why cooperative structure are adopted in a competitive environment. Paper presented at the 1997 Southeastern Conference for Public Administration, Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Olberding J. C. (2000). The formation, structure, process and performance of regional partnerships for economic development in metropolitan areas (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington).
   Google Scholar
• Olberding J. C. (2002). Diving into the “third waves” of regional governance strategies: A study of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. metropolitan areas. Economic Development Quarterly, 16, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1993). American intergovernmental relations: An overview. In L. J. O’Toole, Jr. (Ed.), American intergovernmental relations: Foundations, perspectives and issues (2nd ed., pp.1–32). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., & Feiock, R. C. (2005, April) Social capital and regional partnerships: Overcoming the transaction costs of institutional collective action. Paper presented at the Innovative Governance Salon, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., and Feiock, R. C. (2006). Institutional collective action, social capital, regional partnership. International Review of Public Administration, 11(2), 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., & Oakerson, R. J. (2000). Regionalism, localism, and metropolitan governance: Suggestion from the research program on local public economies. State and Local Government Review, 32, 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, N. R. (1993a). Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, N. R. (1993b). The dawn of the age of the “citistates”. National Journal, 31, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2011). Cost-efficiency and public interest in inter-local partnerships. Urban Research and Practice, 4(1), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raasch, R., & Brooks, J. (1995). Regional alliances improve economic advantage. Nation’s Cities Weekly, 18(38), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. M. (2000). Entrepreneurial cities, U.S. federalism, and economic development. In L. J. O’Toole, Jr. (Ed.), American intergovernmental relations: Foundations, perspectives and issues (3rd ed., pp. 217–228). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., & Feiock, R. C. (2009). Governing U.S. metropolitan areas: Self-organizing and multiplex service networks. American Politics Research, 37, 801–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. (2004). Game theoretic models of metropolitan cooperation. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation (pp. 46–66). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education: Potential perils associated with complex sample designs. Research in Higher Education, 42, 517–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1976). On the nature, formation, and maintenance of relations among organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1(4), 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, J. J. (1991). The Great Depression: Have we learned our lessons? In J. J. Wallis (Ed.), Second thought: The uses of American economic history (pp. 19–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Working Group on Population Growth and Economic Development, Committee on Population, & National Research Council. (1986). Population growth and economic development: Policy questions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar