Achieving Mixed Income Communities through Infill? The Effect of Infill Housing on Neighborhood Income Diversity

REFERENCES

• Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht,The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B, 36, 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2000). Growing smart by linking transportation and urban development. Virginia Environment Law Journal, 357, 357–374.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010). Building “community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45, 299–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), Natural Resources Defense Council, & U.S. Green Building Council. (2011). LEED 2009 for neighborhood development rating system. Washington, DC: U.S. Green Building Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, A., & Newman, L. L. (2009). Sustainable development for some: Green urban development and affordability. Local Environment, 14, 669–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, K. (2003). New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2000). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., & O’Regan, K. (2011). How low income neighborhoods change: Entry, exit, and enhancement. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., Pendall, R., & Chen, D. (2002). Measuring sprawl and its impact. Retrieved from http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/MeasuringSprawl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farris, J. T. (2001). The barriers to using urban infill development to achieve smart growth. Housing Policy Debate, 12, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2009). Neighborhood diversity, metropolitan segregation and gentrification: What are the links in the US? Urban Studies, 46, 2079–2101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., & Harrison, A. (2001). Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/es/urban/publications/fulton.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., Booza, J. C., & Cutsinger, J. M. (2008). Income diversity within neighborhoods and very low-income families. Cityscape, 10(1), 257–300.
   Google Scholar
• Grigsby, W., Baratz, M., Galster, G., & Maclennan, D. (1987). The dynamics of neighborhood change and decline. Progress in Planning, 28, 1–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2009). Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: The case of the Atlanta beltline. Urban Studies, 46, 1723–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, E. J. (2004). The adoption of sustainable development and techniques in U. S. cities: How wide, how deep, and what role for planners? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. A., Schwartz, S. I., & Tracy, S. (1984). Growth phasing and resistance to infill development in Sacramento county. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50, 434–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, H. (2013). Determinants of neighborhood change: A multilevel analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 319–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Chung, H., & Blanco, A. G. (2013). The suburbanization of decline: Filtering, neighborhoods, and housing market dynamics. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35, 435–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. D., Hood, H., Li, G., Rogers, T., & Warren, C. (2006). The future of infill housing in California: Opportunities, potential, and feasibility. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 681–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, K. (2005). New urbanism’s role in inner-city neighborhood revitalization. Housing Studies, 20, 795–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leccese, M., & McCormick, K. (Eds.). (2000). The charter for the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies, 45, 2449–2470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnish, T., Walsh, R., & White, T. K. (2010). Who gentrifies low-income neighborhoods? Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 180–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen, D. P. (2003). Identifying sub-centres using contiguity matrices. Urban Studies, 40, 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D., & Gearin, E. (2001). Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 12, 633–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Special report 298: Driving and the built environment: The effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohls, J. C. (1975). Public policy toward low income housing and filtering in housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 2, 144–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., & Carruthers, J. I. (2003). Does density exacerbate income segregation? Evidence from U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000. Housing Policy Debate, 14, 541–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. A. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411002_HOPEVI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Quercia, R. G., & Galster, G. C. (2000). Threshold effects and neighborhood change. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20(2), 146–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. D., & Weber, R. (2007). Valuing new development in distressed urban neighborhoods: Does design matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, D., & Paterson, R. G. (2008). Local government efforts to promote the “three Es” of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, L., & Zhou, J. (2010). Neighborhood air quality, respiratory health, and vulnerable populations in compact and sprawled regions. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. (2003). Infill development and affordable housing: Patterns from 1996 to 2000. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, D. R. (2002). Developing successful infill housing. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2006a). Design that enables diversity: The complications of a planning ideal. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2006b). Neighborhood-level social diversity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 431–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. (1996). Neighborhood change and urban policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, D. M. (2001). Land use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. American Geographical Society, 91, 544–564.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999). The transportation and environmental impacts of infill versus greenfield development: A comparative case study analysis. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/infill_greenfield.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2001). Comparing methodologies to assess transportation and air quality impacts of brownfields and infill development. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/comparing_methodologies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2007). Measuring the air quality and transportation impacts of infill development. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/transp_impacts_infill.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, K. (2009). An exploration of the impact of residential infill on neighborhood property values (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (Order No. 3389028).
   Google Scholar