Territorial political orientations in Swedish city-regions

References

• Antonsich, M., & Holland, E. C. (2014). Territorial attachment in the age of globalization: The case of Western Europe.European Urban and Regional Studies, 21, 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkan, S. E. (2004). Explaining public support for the environmental movement: A civic voluntarism model. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 913–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, J. (2005). Perspectives on the city-region. Regional Studies, 39, 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, D. J., & Frug, G. E. (2005). Defensive localism: A view of the field from the field. Journal of Law and Politics, 21, 261–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. (2003). Reinventing urban citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 7, 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Bolan, M. (1997). The mobility experience and neighborhood attachment. Demography, 34, 225–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, N. (2015). Citizens’ views on city-regional governance in Sweden. Journal of Urban Affairs, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, W., & Leknes, E. (2012). The city region as a concept, object, and practice. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 66(4), 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, J. F. (2005). Voters in context: Cities, suburbs and presidential vote. American Politics Research, 33, 435–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, M. (2006). Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities. Urban Studies, 43, 745–765.
   Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Martinot, V., & Sellers, J. (2007). Metropolitan governance. In United Cities and Local Governments, World report on decentralization and local democracy (pp. 255–279). Barcelona, Spain: United Cities and Local Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., & Savitch, H. V. (2010). The politics of city regions in comparative perspective. Métropoles, 7, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., & Olsson, M. (2006). The identification of functional regions: Theory, methods, and applications. Annals of Regional Science, 40, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C., & Lowery, D. (2004). Political participation and metropolitan institutional contexts. Urban Affairs Review, 39, 720–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler, D. (2005). La métropole et le citoyen. Les agglomerations urbaines en Suisse vues par leurs habitants.Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
   Google Scholar
• Laczko, L. S. (2005). National and local attachments in a changing world system: Evidence from an international survey. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 15, 517–528.
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C. (2010). The improbable metropolis: Decentralization, local democracy and metropolitan areas in the Western world. Ana´lise Social, 45, 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2006). Commuting and citizen participation in Swedish city-regions. Political Studies, 54, 865–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2010). Citizens’ inter-municipal political orientations: Evidence from Swedish city-regions. Urban Studies, 47, 2093–2109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2011). Sweden – Party dominated sub-national democracy under challenge. In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on sub-national democracy in Europe (pp. 261–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2013). Citizens in city-regions: Political orientations across municipal borders. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 282–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A., & Schaap, L. ( this issue). Comparing Citizenship in City-Regions. An Introduction. Journal of Urban Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. (1999). Territorial identities in the European Union. In J. J. Anderson (Ed.), Regional integration and democracy: Expanding on the European experience. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Redefining territories – The functional regions. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, L. E. (2002) Municipal size and local nonelectoral participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20, 829–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. (2008). The limits of boundaries: Why city-regions cannot be self-governing. Kingston, ON, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H., & Vogel, R. K. (2009). Regionalism and urban politics. In J. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (2nd ed., 106–124). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J., & Hoffmann-Martinot, V. (2009). Metropolitan governance. In United Cities and Local Governments, Decentralization and local democracy in the world (pp. 253–279). Barcelona, Spain: UCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Syssner, J. (2011). No space for citizens? Conceptualizations of citizenship in a functional region. Citizenship Studies, 15(1), 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. R. (2006). The causes of city-suburban political polarization: A Canadian case study. Annals of theAssociation of American Geographers, 96, 390–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar