Where are the cost savings in city–county consolidation?

References

• Benton, J. E. (2003a). County government structure and county revenue policy: What's the connection? State and Local Government Review, 35(2), 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, J. E. (2003b). The impact of structural reform on county government service provision. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 858–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, J. E., & Gamble, D. (1984). City/county consolidation and economies of scale: Evidence from a time‐series analysis in Jacksonville, FL. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote‐seeking, tax‐ setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85, 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (1992). Local government structure and performance: Lessons from America? Public Administration, 70, 333–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property‐tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54(2), 203–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, B. S., & Strauss, R. P. (1992). Municipal consolidation: An analysis of the financial benefits for fiscally distressed small municipalities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 615–629.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. J. (2004). Leviathan and fiscal illusion in local government overlapping jurisdictions. Public Choice, 120, 301–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. J., & Turnbull, G. K. (2003). On government structure and spending: The effects of management form and separation of powers. Urban Studies, 40, 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., Bae, S.‐S., & Lu, W. (2006). City–county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review, 38(3), 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Condrey, S. E. (1994). Organizational and personnel impacts on local government consolidation: Athens–Clarke County, Georgia. Journal of Urban Affairs, 16, 371–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHoog, R. H., Lowery, D., & Lyons, W. E. (1990). Citizen satisfaction with local governance: A test of individual, jurisdictional, and city‐specific explanations. Journal of Politics, 52, 807–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B. E., & Worthington, A. C. (1996). The empirical analysis of fiscal illusion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10, 261–297.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (1993). An analysis of returns to scale in public production, with an application to fire protection. Journal of Public Economics, 52, 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning, D. (1995). The effects of city–county government consolidation: The perspectives of united government employees in Athens–Clarke county, Georgia. Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 272–298.
   Google Scholar
• Durning, D., & Nobbie, P. D. (2000). Post‐transition employee perspectives on city–county unification: The case of Athens–Clarke County. Public Administration Quarterly, 24, 140–168.
   Google Scholar
• Eberts, R. W., & Gronberg, T. J. (1990). Structure, conduct, and performance in the local public sector. National Tax Journal, 43(2), 165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulk, D., & Hicks, M. (2011). Local government consolidation in the United States. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faulk, D., Schaal, P., & Taylor, C. D. (2013). How does local government amalgamation affect spending? Evidence from Louisville, Kentucky. Public Finance and Management, 13(2), 80–98.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2004).Do consolidation entrepreneurs make a deal with the devil? In J. B. Carr & R. C. Feiock (Eds.), City–county consolidation and its alternatives: Reshaping the local government landscape (pp. 39–52). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Carr, J. B. (1997). A reassessment of city/county consolidation: Economic development impacts. State and Local Government Review, 29(3), 166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, M. (1997). Scale economics and police department consolidation: Evidence from Los Angeles. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(January), 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, K. F., & Zampelli, E. M. (1989). Is leviathan a mythical beast? American Economic Review, 79, 568–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustely, R. D. (1977). The allocational and distributional impacts of governmental consolidation: The Dade County experience. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 349–364.
   Google Scholar
• Gyapong, A. O., & Gyimah‐Brempong, K. (1988). Factor substitution, price elasticity of demand and returns to scale in police production: Evidence from Michigan. Southern Economic Journal, 54, 863–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, W. H. (1990). Local government inefficiency and the Tiebout hypothesis: Does competition among municipalities limit local government inefficiency? Southern Economic Journal, 57, 481–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., & Adhikari, S. (2013). Indicators of financial condition in pre‐ and post‐merger Louisville. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35, 553–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krimmel, J. T. (1997). The Northern York County police consolidation experience: An analysis of the consolidation of police services in eight Pennsylvania rural communities. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 20, 497–507.
   Google Scholar
• Langbein, L. I., Crewson, P., & Brasher, C. N. (1996). Rethinking ward and at‐large elections in cities: Total spending, the number of locations of selected city services, and policy types. Public Choice, 88, 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leland, S. M., & Thurmaier, K. (2010). City–county consolidation: Promises made, promises kept? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. E. (1977). The politics of city–county merger: The Lexington‐Layette County experience. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, R. J., & Cook, T. D. (1994). Convincing quasi‐experiments: The interrupted tie series and regression‐discontinuity designs. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 133–154). San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., & Schiff, J. H. (2011). City–county consolidations: Promise versus performance. State and Local Government Review, 43(2), 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• McDavid, J. C. (2002). The impacts of amalgamation on police services in the Halifax Regional Municipality. Canadian Public Administration, 45, 538–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. R., & Kickham, K. (1999). Changing the form of county government: Effects on revenue and expenditure policy. Public Administration Review, 59, 315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (2004). Same governance, different day: Does metropolitan reorganization make a difference? Review of Policy Research, 21, 595–611.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V. (2011). Analysis and comment: Task force on merger 2.0. Report submitted to Darryl T. Owens, Representative House District 42 and Member of Merger 2.0 Task Force. Retrieved June 19, 2014, from http://hvsavitch.blogspot.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (1986). Fragmentation and the growth of local government. Public Choice, 48, 255–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C., & Campbell, R. W. (2000). The expenditure impacts of unification in a small Georgia county: A contingency perspective of city–county consolidation. Public Administration Quarterly, 24(2), 169–201.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoquist, D. L. (1982). The effect of the number of local governments on central city expenditures. National Tax Journal, 35(1), 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, G. K. (2007). Government form and performance: Fiscal illusion and administrative ability in U.S. counties. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 754–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, G. K., & Djoundourian, S. S. (1994). The median voter hypothesis: Evidence from general purpose local governments. Public Choice, 81, 223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojnovic, I. (2000). The transitional impacts of municipal consolidations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22, 385–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. E. (1976). Revenue structure, fiscal illusion and budgetary choice. Public Choice, 25, 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zax, J. S. (1989). Is there a leviathan in your neighborhood? American Economic Review, 79, 560–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar