Use of Feed-forward Mechanisms in a Novel Research-led Module

References

• åkerlind, G.S. (2005) Postdoctoral researchers: Roles, functions and career prospects. Higher Education Research & Development 24, 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton-Knapp, S.L. and Krentler, K.A. (2006) Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: The importance of managing student expectations. Journal of Marketing Education 28, 254–264.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, M. (1995) What should we be assessing? In Assessment for Learning in Higher Education ( ed. P. Knight). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, R., Badge, J., Cann, A., Willmot, C. and Scott, J. (2008) Seeing eye-to-eye? Staff and student views on feedback. Bioscience Education 12, doi: 10.3108/beej.12.1.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5, 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000) Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education 22, 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. (2006) Research and Teaching: Beyond the divide ( eds. N. Entwistle and R. King). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendelbury, M. (1997) Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. (2000) Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 5, 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R Book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B.R. (2007) Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32, 571–581.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M. and Sluijsmans, D. (1999) The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education 24, 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, N. (2007) ‘Feed-forward’: Improving students‘ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32, 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. and Goldfinch, J. (2000) Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research 70, 287–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2004) Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, C. and Brown, E. (2006) Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education 7, doi: 10.3108/beej.2006.07000004.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Biggs, J. and Purdie, N. (1996) Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66, 99–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. (2001) Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 6, 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Academy (2012) A Marked Improvement: Transforming assessment in higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, S.A. (2011) Making movies: The next big thing in feedback? Bioscience Education 18, doi: 10.3108/beej.18.2SE.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R. and Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998) Teaching and research: Student perspectives and policy implications. Studies in Higher Education 23, 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclellan, E. (2001) Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, 307–318.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, L. and Saunders, G. (2009) Exploring Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback. Project Report. Southampton: The Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Social Policy and Social Work (SWAP).
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W.J. (2002) Teaching Tips. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010) From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35, 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2004) Rethinking formative assessment in HE: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. In Enhancing Student Learning Though Effective Formative Feedback ( eds. C. Juwah, D. Macfarlane-Dick, B. Matthew, D. Nicol and B. Smith). York: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P. (2011) Self- and Peer-assessment: Guidance on Practice in the Biosciences. Leeds: UK Centre for Bioscience, Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Reiling, K. (1997) A study in self-assessment: Tutor and students’ perceptions of performance criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22 (4), 357–369.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Reiling, K. (2005) Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, 369–386.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) (2006) Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education. Section 6: Assessment of Students. Gloucester: QAA.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J., Shields, C., Gardner, J. and Hancock, A. (2011) Student engagement with feedback. Bioscience Education 18, 9pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. (1994) Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education 19, 69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, M.R. (2006) Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, 379–394.
   Google Scholar