Perceptions and their influences on approaches to learning

References

• AkamN. (2003) Engineering? No thanks! I want to do something creative! Progress 3 Conference: Strategies For Student Achievement In Engineering. 25 to 26 September 2003, Hull, UK.
   Google Scholar
• BailieC. and BernhardJ. (2009) Educational research impacting engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4). 291-294.
   Google Scholar
• BorregoM., DouglasE. P. and AmelinkC, T. (2009) Quantitative, qualitative and mixed research methods in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 98 (1), 53-66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoudD. (Ed.) (1981) Developing student autonomy in learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Public Accounts (2008) Staying the course: the retention of students on higher education courses. Tenth Report of Session 2007-08. House of Commons report.
   Google Scholar
• CreswellJ. and GarrettA. (2008) The ‘movement’ of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28, 321-333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CreswellJ. and Plano-ClarkV. (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CreswellJ. W. (2003) Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CreswellJ. W. and ClarkV. L. P. (2008) The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CronjeT. and CollR. K. (2008) Student perceptions of higher education science and engineering learning communitites. Research in Science and Technological Education, 26 (3), 295-309.
   Google Scholar
• CroslingG., ThomasL. and HeagneyM (2007) Improving student retention in higher education: the role of teaching and learning. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• EliotM., TurnsJ. and XuK. (2008) Engineering students’ external and internal frames of reference for the construction of professional identity. Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 7-10 July 2008, Davos, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• EllisR., GoodyearP., CalvoR. and ProsserM. (2008) Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18 (3), 267-282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EntwistleN. (2008) Taking stock: teaching and learning research in higher education. International symposium on ‘Teaching and Learning Research in Higher Education’, 25-26 April 2008, Guelph, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• ETL-Project (2005) Shortened experiences of teaching and learning questionnaire. Available from http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/etl/docs/SETLQ.pdf [accessed 23 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• HammoudehA. (2003) Tackling student retention - strategic and tactical interventions. Progress 3 Conference: Strategies for Student Achievement In Engineering. 25-26 September 2003, Hull, UK.
   Google Scholar
• JesiekB., BorregoM. and BeddoesK. (2008) Expanding global engineering education research collaboration. Proceedings of the 2008 SEFI Annual Conference, 2-5 July 2008, Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• JonesR. (2008) Widening participation/student retention and success. Available from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/EvidenceNet/Syntheses/wp_retention_synthesis.pdf [accessed 23 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• LairdT. F. N., ShoupR., KuhG.D. and SchwarzM.J. (2008) The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49, 469-494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbolm-YlanneS., TrigwellK., NevgiA. and AshwinP. (2006) How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (3), 285-298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loshbaugh. H. G. and ClaarB. A. (2007) Geeks are chic: cultural identity and engineering students’ pathways to the profession. American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 24-27 June 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• MaffioliF. and AugustiG. (2003) Tuning engineering education into the European Higher Education Orchestra. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28 (3), 251-273.
   Google Scholar
• MooreT., Diefes-DuxH. and ImbrieP.K. (2007) Developing first-year students’ perceptions of the engineering profession through realistic, client-driven problems. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 19-22 October 2005, Indianapolis, USA.
   Google Scholar
• MorseJ. (1991) Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40 (2), 120-123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (2007) Staying the course: the retention of students in higher education. House of Commons report.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford University Press (2010) Oxford Dictionary.
   Google Scholar
• PROGRESS Project (2004) Methodologies for improving student progression in engineering. Available from www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/progress/methodology.pdf [accessed 23 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• ProsserM. and TrigwellK. (2001) Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• TessmerM. and RicheyR. C. (1997) The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 (2), 85-115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar