Does advocacy help to embed information literacy into the curriculum? A case study

References

• BestB. (2003) Accelerated learning pocketbook. Alresford: Teachers’ Pocketbooks.
   Google Scholar
• BodenD. & HollowayS. (2005) ‘What’s in a name?’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• BodiS. (1990) ‘Teaching effectiveness and bibliographic instruction: the relevance of learning styles’, College and Research Libraries, March: 113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrineA. & StubbingsR. (2003) ‘Plagiarism and the role of the library’, Library & Information Update, 2(12): 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• DominoG. (1971) ‘Interactive effects of achievement orientation and teaching styles on academic achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 62: 427–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoskatschI., 2002. ‘Immersion in Australia: an information literacy health spa for librarians?’, Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 33(3): 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• GoodwinP. (2003) ‘Information Literacy, but at what level?’, in MartinA. & RaderH. (eds.) Information & IT literacy: enabling learning in the 21st century. London: Facet Publishing: 88–99.
   Google Scholar
• GrassianE. (2004) ‘Building on bibliographic instruction: our strong BI foundation supports a promising IL future’, American Libraries, 35(9): 51–52.
   Google Scholar
• HobbsH. & AsplandT. (2003) ‘Bedding down the embedding: IL reality in a teacher education programme’, Australian Library Journal, 52(4): 341–351.
   Google Scholar
• HowardH. & NewtonA. (2005) ‘How to win hearts and minds’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• JacksonC. and MoggR. (2005) ‘Embedding IL into the curriculum’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• JohnstonB. & WebberS. (2003) ‘Information literacy in Higher Education: a review and case study’, Studies in Higher Education, 28(3): 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesR. (2005) ‘Information literacy and independent learning’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 56.
   Google Scholar
• Jubilee Project Team (2002) Jubilee (JISC User Behaviour in Information seeking: Longitudinal Evaluation of EIS) annual report 2002. 3rd edn.
   Google Scholar
• LockS. (July 2004) The Seven Pillars of Information Literacy [Online]. Available at http://www.sconul.ac.uk/activities/inf_lit/seven_pillars.html (Accessed 11 November 2005).
   Google Scholar
• McloughlinD. (2004) ‘It’s eliteracy Jim, but not as we know it: exploring a common approach to creating an effective eliteracy framework for Edge Hill’. Paper presented at eLit 2004, eLiteracy for Learning and Life. Third International Conference on eLiteracy, 2-4 June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• MoonJ. (2001) Short courses and workshops: improving the impact of learning, training and professional development. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• NeedhamG. (2004) ‘Does it work? Strengthening the evidence base for Information Literacy development’. Paper presented at eLit 2004: eLiteracy for Learning and lIfe. Third International Conference on eLiteracy, 2-4 June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• PoirerJ. (2005) ‘Connecting to great minds: an information literacy framework for final year students’. Paper presented at GCEE2005. 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, 16-19 September 2005.
   Google Scholar
• PowisC. & WebbJ. (2005) ‘Start with the learner’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency. (2001), 6 October, 2005-last updated, Policy statement on a progress file for Higher Education [Online]. Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/progressFiles/archive/policystatement/default.asp (Accessed 11 November 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Queensland University of Technology Library (07 January, 2005) information literacy: academics [Online]. Available at: http://www.library.qut.edu.au/academics/ (Accessed 24 October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• RoscelloF.R. (2003) ‘Standards implementation: a planned advocacy campaign’, School Libraries in Canada, 23(1): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• RutterR. & MathewsM. (2002) ‘Infoskills: a holistic approach to on-line user education’, The Electronic Library, 20(1): 29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SanderP. & StevensonK. & KingM. & CoatesD. (2000) ‘University students’ expectations of teaching’, Studies in Higher Education, 25(3): 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmartJ. (2004) ‘Consistency, context and collaboration’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• SmithM. & HepworthM. (2005) ‘Motivating learners to become information-literate’, Library & Information Update, 4(1 - 2): 46–47.
   Google Scholar
• SottoE. (1994) When teaching becomes learning. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• SpenceL. (2004) ‘The usual does not work: why we need problem-based learning’, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(4): 485–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TarterA. & WavellC. (2005) ‘Learning the vocabulary of education’, Library & Information Update, 4(1-2): 54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Teacher Librarian, (2003) TL toolkit: collaborative program planning and teaching [Online]. Available at: http://www.teacherlibrarian.com/images/media/Collaborative%20Program%20Planning.pdf (Accessed 27 October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• UrquhartC. & ThomasR. & LonsdaleR. & SpinkS. & YeomanA. & FentonR. & ArmstrongC. (2003) Uptake and use of electronic information services: trends in UK higher education from the JUSTEIS project. Program: electronic library & information systems, 37(3): 168–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WallerL. & DouglasJ. (2003) ‘Information Skills Information Sources: Learning Objects for information literacy’. Paper presented at eLit 2003: Second International Conference on Information and IT Literacy, 11-13 June 2003.
   Google Scholar