Communicative competence in the information age: Towards a critical theory of information literacy education

References

• ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries) (2000) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education: standards, performance indicators and outcomes, Chicago, ACRL. http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilcomstan.html (Accessed: 9 November 2005)
   Google Scholar
• AndrettaS. (2005) Information literacy: empowering the learner “against all odds”. Paper presented at the LILAC Conference, 4-6 April 2005, Imperial College, London. [Online] Tangentium, 2(2) May 2005. Available at: http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/∼polaw/tangentium/may05/feature3.html (Accessed: 12 November 2005)
   Google Scholar
• ArendtH. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ArgyrisC. & SchönD. A. (1974) Theory in Practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• AugoustinosM. & WalkerI. (1996) Social Cognition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• BeckU. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• BergeZ. L. & CollinsM. P. (1995) Computer-Mediated Communication and the Online Classroom. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• BlaugR. (1999) Democracy Real and Ideal: Discourse Ethics and Radical Politics. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• BurrellG. and MorganG. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• BushV. (1945) ‘As We May Think’, Atlantic Monthly, July. [Online] Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush (Accessed: 9 November 2005).
   Google Scholar
• CalhounC. (ed.) (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• CallinicosA. (1989) Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• CapelR. (1992) ‘Social Histories of Computer Education: Missed Opportunities?’x, in BeynonJ. & MackayH. (eds.) Technological Literacy and the Curriculum. London: Falmer: 38-64.
   Google Scholar
• CarrW. & KemmisS. (1986) Becoming Critical: Knowing Through Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ChecklandP. (1999) Soft Systems Methodology: a 30-year retrospective. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• ComteA. (1869) Course de philosophie positive. Paris: J. B. Ballière.
   Google Scholar
• CushmanM. (2005) ‘letter to The Guardian’, October 10. [Online] Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,,1588403,00.html (Accessed: 13 November 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Eshet-AlkalaiY. (2004) ‘Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era’, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1): 93-106.
   Google Scholar
• FayB. (1975) Social Theory and Political Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• ForesterJ. (1985) ‘The Policy Analysis—Critical Theory Affair: Wildavsky and Habermas as Bedfellows?’, in ForesterJ. (ed.) Critical Theory and Public Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• GarsonG. D. (2000) ‘The role of information technology in quality education’, in GarsonG. D. (ed.) Social Dimensions of Information Technology: Issues for the New Millennium. London: Idea Group: 177-197.
   Google Scholar
• GauntlettD. (2000) Web Studies: A User’s Guide, in GauntlettD. (ed.) web.studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age. London, Arnold: 2-18.
   Google Scholar
• GilsterP. (1997) Digital Literacy. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1976) Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action volume I: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action volume 2: Lifeworld and system — a critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1991) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (1994) The Past as Future. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ. (2001) On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary studies in the Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• HepworthM. (2000) ‘Approaches to providing information literacy training in higher education: challenges for librarians’, The New Review of Academic Librarianship 6, 21-34.
   Google Scholar
• KempR. (1985) ‘Planning, Public Hearings, and the Politics of Discourse’, in ForesterJ. (ed.) Critical Theory and Public Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 177-201.
   Google Scholar
• KohlbergL. (1971) ‘From Is To Ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development’, in MischelL. (ed.) Cognitive Development and Epistemology. in London: Academic Press: 151-235.
   Google Scholar
• KolbD. (1996) ‘Discourse across links’, in EssC. (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany: SUNY Press: 15-26.
   Google Scholar
• LangeforsB. (1970) ‘Computer applications in the 1970s: consequences for education from computer science to informatics’, in ScheepmakerB. & ZinnK. L. (eds) World Conference on Computer Education 1970, papers of the 1st IFIP Conference. Groningen: I/29 - I/33.
   Google Scholar
• LinH. (2000) ‘Fluency with information technology’, Government Information Quarterly, 17(1): 69-76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LukeT. W. & WhiteS. K. (1985) ‘Critical theory, the information revolution, and an ecological path to modernity’, in ForesterJ. (ed.) Critical Theory and Public Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 22-56.
   Google Scholar
• MackayH. (1992) ‘From Computer Literacy to Technology Literacy’, in BeynonJ. & MackayH. (eds.) Technological Literacy and the Curriculum. London: Falmer: 125-147.
   Google Scholar
• MartinA. (2003) ‘Towards e-literacy’, in MartinA. & RaderH. (eds.) Information and IT literacy: Enabling learning in the 21st century. London: Facet: 3-23.
   Google Scholar
• MartinA. & RaderH. (eds.) (2003): Information and IT literacy: Enabling learning in the 21st century. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthyT. (1984) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• MitchamC. (1994) Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• MiyoshiM. (2002) ‘The University in the ‘Global’ Economy’, in RobinsK. & WebsterF. (eds.) The Virtual University?: Knowledge, Markets and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 49-83.
   Google Scholar
• NevisonJ. M. (1976) Computing in the liberal arts college, Science, October 22: 396-402.
   Google Scholar
• OffeC. (1984) ‘Ungovernability: On the renaissance of conservative theories of crisis’, in HabermasJ. (ed.) Observations on ‘The Spiritual Situation of the Age’. Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 67-88.
   Google Scholar
• OuthwaiteW. (1996) The Habermas Reader. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• ReffellP. & WhitworthA. (2002) ‘Information fluency: critically examining IT education’, New Library World, 102(11-12): 427-435.
   Google Scholar
• RheingoldH. (2000) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• SchottR. L. (1991) ‘Administrative and Organizational Behavior: Some Insights from Cognitive Psychology’, Administration and Society, 23(1): 54-73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchulerD. & NamiokaA. (eds.) (1993) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• ShenkD. (1997) Data Smog: Surviving the information glut. San Francisco: HarperEdge.
   Google Scholar
• ShorI. (1996) When students have power: negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WebsterF. (2002) Theories of the Information Society. Revised ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteS. K. (1988) The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice and modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WhitworthA. (2005) ‘Who wants to learn web design anyway? Course design for student diversity in an ICT sub-discipline’, ITALICS 4(2). [Online] Available at: http://www.ics.ltsn.ac.uk/pub/italics/vol4iss2.htm (Accessed: 10 November 2005)
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsR. and EdgeD. (1996) ‘The Social Shaping of Technology’, Research Policy, 25: 856-899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrongD. H. (1995) Power: Its forms, bases and uses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• YoungR. E. (1990) A critical theory of education: Habermas and our children’s future. New York: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• ZellerT. (2005) ‘Measuring literacy in a world gone digital,’ New York Times, 17 January 2005 . [Online] Available at: http://shulman.ucsur.pitt.edu/doc/Supplemental/ITFluency/MeasuringLiteracy.pdf (Accessed: 13 November 2005)
   Google Scholar