References
- AlnabhanM., (2002), An empirical investigation of the effects of three methods of handling guessing and risk taking on the psychometric indices of a test, Social Behaviour and Personality, 30(7), pp 645-652.
- Ben-SimonA., BudescuD. & NevoB., (1997), A comparison study of measures of partial knowledge in multiple-choice tests, Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(1), pp 65-88.
- BradbardD., ParkerD & StoneG., (2004), An alternative multiple-choice scoring procedure in a macroeconomics course, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), pp 11-26.
- BushM., (2001), A multiple-choice test that rewards partial knowledge, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(2), pp 157-163.
- CoombsC. H., MilhollandJ. E. & WomerF. B., (1956), The assessment of partial knowledge, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, pp 13-37.
- FrandsenG. S. & SchwarzbachM. T., (2006), A singular choice for multiple choice, ACM SIGCSE, 38(4), pp 34-38.
- GibbonsJ. D., OlkinI. & SobelM. A., (1979), Subset selection technique for scoring items on a multiple-choice test, Psychometika, 44, pp 259-270.
- JaradatD. & SawagedS., (1986), The subset selection technique for multiple-choice tests: an empirical inquiry, Educational Assessment, 23(4), pp 369-376.
- JenningsS. & BushM., (2006), A comparison of conventional and liberal (free-choice) multiple-choice tests, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(8).