The Impact of Teaching Models, Group Structures and Assessment Modes on Cooperative Learning in the Student Design Studio

References

• Bandura A. (1962). Social Learning through Imitation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. (1975). Social Learning & Personality Development. NJ: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, INC.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee H. & De Graaff E. (1996). Problem Based Learning in Architecture; Problems of Integration of Technical Disciplines. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21 (2), 185-195.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J. & Dobbie G. (1999). Supporting and Evaluating team dynamics in group projects. Paper presented at the 30th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers T., Manning A. & Theriot L. (2000). A New Theory for the Assignment of Members to Engineering Design Teams. Paper presented at the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Chang T. & Chang D. (2000). The Role of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Electrical Engineering Education. URL: http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2000/Proceedings/papers/MD6-2.pdf [accessed 10 August 2005].
   Google Scholar
• Cuff D. (1991). Architecture: The story of Practice. Mass: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff E. & Cowdroy R. (1997). Theory and Practice of Educational Innovation; Introduction of Problem-Based Learning in Architecture. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 13 (3), 166-174.
   Google Scholar
• Deibel K. (2005). Team Formation Methods for Increasing Interaction during In-Class Group Work. Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. June 27-29, 2005. Caparica Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg P. (1999). What Do You Mean by Collaborative Learning? In P.Dillenbourg. (Ed.). Collaborative-learning: cognitive and computational approaches (1-16). Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy F., Segers M., Van de Bossche P. & Gijbels D.(2003). Effects of problem-based learning; a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533-568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominick P. G., Reilly R. R. & McGourty J. (1997). Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process. Paper presented at the Best Assessment Processes in Engineering Education: A Working Symposium, Terre Haute, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Durling D., Cross N. & Johnson J. (1996). Personality and learning preferences of students in design and design-related disciplines. URL: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/cd/research/idater/downloads96/durling96.pdf [accessed 13 September 2005].
   Google Scholar
• Ellis T. J. & Hafner W. (2005). Peer Evaluations of Collaborative Learning Experiences Conveyed Through an Asynchronous Learning Network. Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov N. (1986). Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11 (2), 146-166.
   Google Scholar
• Filene P. G. (1969). Self-grading: An Experiment in Learning. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40 (6), 451-458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman M. & McKenzie J. (2000). Self and Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork: Designing, implementing and evaluating SPARK, a confidential, web based system. Paper presented at the ASET-HERDSA 2000 Conference, Toowoomba, Qld.
   Google Scholar
• Gorla N. & Lam Y. (2004). Who Should Work With Whom? Communications of the ACM, 7 (5), 79-82.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry G., Heinrich P., Lyon P., Barrat A., Simpson J., Hyde S., Gonsalkorale S., Hyde M. & Mgaieth S. (2005). Helping Students Understand their Learning Styles: Effects on study self-efficacy, preference for group work and group climate. Educational Psychology, 25 (4), 395 - 407.
   Google Scholar
• Keirsey D. (1998). Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Del Mar, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kvan T. & Yunyan J. (2005). Student Learning Styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design Studies, 26 (10), 19-34.
   Google Scholar
• Lai P. & Tang C. (2000). Obstacles to the implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) in local universities of Hong Kong. In O.S.Tan, P.Little, S.Y.Hee & J.Conway (eds). Problem-Based Learning: Educational innovation across disciplines. Singapore: Temasek Centre for Problem-Based Learning.]
   Google Scholar
• Oakley B., Felder R., Brent R. & Elhajj I. (2004). Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2 (1), 9-33.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. (1955). The Republic (D.Lee, Trans.): Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Roach P. (1999). Using Peer Assessment and Self-Assessment for the First Time. Assessment Matters in Higher Education (pp. 191-201). Buckingham [England]: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C. R. (1983). Dimensions of Facilitator Education. In M.Thorpe, Edwards R. and Hanson R. (Ed.). Dimensions of Facilitator Education. (pp. 228-242). London: Dimensions of Facilitator Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherfoord R. (2001). Using Personality Inventories to Help Form Teams for Software Engineering Class Projects. URL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/380000/377486/p73rutherfoord.pdf?key1=377486&key2=283
   Google Scholar
• Savery J. & Duffy T. (2001). Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its constructivist framework. CRLT Technical Report No 16-01. Centre for Research on Learning and Technology, Indiana University, Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Schrage M. (1995). No More Teams! Mastering the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration. New York: Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Smith E. & Mackie D. (2000). Social Psychology. Santa Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker R. (in print). Teaching and Learning in Collaborative Group Design Projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering & Design Management (Teaching and Learning in the Built Environment).
   Google Scholar
• Umbach P. & Wawrzynski M. (2005). Faculty Do Matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46 (2), 153-184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar