References
- Argyris C. (1981). Teaching and learning in design studio settings. In: Consortium of East Coast Schools of Architecture, architectural education study, Vol. 1: The papers. New York: Andrew Mellon Foundation.
- Belbin R. M. (1981). Management teams: Why they succeed or fail. London: Heinemann.
- Billig S. H., Root S. & Jesse D. M. (2005). The impact of participation in service-learning on high school students’ civic engagement. Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE). URL: http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP33Billig.pdf
- Bines H. (1992). Course delivery and assessment. In: Bines H. & Watson D.Developing professional education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, pp. 57-89.
- Bines H. & Watson D. (1992). Developing professional education: A polytechnic perspective. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
- Building Futures. (2011). The future for architects?Royal Institution of British Architects. URL: http://www.buildingfutures.org.uk/assets/downloads/The_Future_for_Architects_Full_Report_2.pdf (Accessed 6 June 2011).
- Chiles P. & Till J. (no date). Live projects: An inspirational model the student perspective. CEBE Case Study. URL: http://cebe.cf.ac.uk/learning/casestudies/case_pdf/PrueChiles.pdf (Accessed 3 June 2011).
- Flyvbjerg B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Forsyth A., Lu H. & McGirr P. (1999). Inside the service learning studio in urban design. Landscape Journal, 18 (2), 166-179.
- Frymier A. B. & Shulman G. M. (1995). What’s in it for me? Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44 (1), 40-50.
- George P. (1992). Academic disciplines and professional education: The case of sociology. In: Bines H. & Watson D.Developing professional education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, pp. 150-155.
- Glaser B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
- Kolb D. A. & Fry R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In: Cooper C. L. (Ed.). Theories of group processes. New York: Wiley, pp. 33-58.
- Mattessich P. W. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. Minnesota: Amherst H Wilder Foundation.
- Nicol D. & Pilling S. (2000). Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism. London: Spon Press.
- Ramsden P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Rogers J. (2001). Adults learning. 4th ed.Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Sara R. (2004a). Between studio and street: The role of the live project in architectural education. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
- Sara R. (2004b). Does the live project have a future in architectural education?Studio Culture 2: Touching the Real, 15th-16thDecember (trigger paper). http://cebe.cf.ac.uk/news/events/sc2/index.php
- Sara R. (2006). Live project good practice: A guide for the implementation of live projects. CEBE Briefing Guide No. 8. URL: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/cebe/documents/resources/briefingguides/BriefingGuide_08.pdf
- Schön D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Urdan T. C. (Ed.) (1999). The role of context: Advances in achievement and motivation. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
- Wink J. (2005). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.