1,545
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Influence of the Built Environment on Graduate Student Perceptions of Graduate School Experience

Pages 79-92 | Published online: 15 Dec 2015

References

  • Acoustical Society of America. (2000). Classroom acoustics: A resource for creating learning environments with desirable listening conditions. URL: http://acousticalsociety.org/about_acoustics/acoustics_of_classrooms
  • Astin A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bennett S. (2006). First questions for designing higher education learning spaces. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (1), 14-16.
  • Bennett S. (2007). Designing for uncertainty: Three approaches. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (2), 165-179.
  • Burns R. (2001). Designing the university campus: It matters. National Forum. URL: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-78438417.html
  • Cao W. (2001). How male and female doctoral students experience their doctoral programs similarly and differently. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
  • Chickering A. W. & Reisser L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Clark M. H. & Schroth C. A. (2009). Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 20 (1), 19-24.
  • Cooke D. K., Sims R. L. & Peyrefitte J. (1995). The relationship between graduate student attitudes and attrition. Journal of Psychology, 129 (6), 677-688.
  • Crampton F., Thompson D. & Vesely R. (2004). The forgotten side of school finance equity: The role of infrastructure funding in student success. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 88 (640), 29-56.
  • Donald J. & Denison D. (1996). Evaluating undergraduate education: The use of broad indicators. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21 (1), 23-39.
  • Dorn S. M., Papalewis R. & Brown R. (1995). Educators earning their doctorates: Doctoral student perceptions regarding cohesiveness and persistence. Education, 116 (2), 305-315.
  • Hawkins W. & Lilley H. (1992). CEFPI’s guide for school facility appraisal. Columbus, Ohio: The Council of Educational Facility Planners International.
  • Hearn J., Lewis D., Kallsen L., Holdsworth J. & Jones L. (2006). Incentives for managed growth: A case study of incentives-based planning and budgeting in a large public research university. Journal of Higher Education, 77 (2), 286-316.
  • Hill M. C. & Epps K. K. (2010). The impact of physical classroom environments on student satisfaction and student evaluation of teaching in the university environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14 (4), 65-79.
  • Illuminating Engineering Society. (2000). Recommended practice on lighting for educational facilities. IESNA School and College Lighting Committee. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
  • Ivankova N. V. & Stick S. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48 (1), 93-135.
  • Johnson B. & Christensen L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Keeling R. P. (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience. URL: www.myacpa.org/pub/documents/LearningReconsidered.pdf (Accessed 1 November 2008).
  • Matell M. S. & Jacoby J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31 (3), 657-674.
  • National Science Foundation. (2008). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: Summary report 2007-08. URL: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/doctorates/ (Accessed 12 April 2010).
  • Pascarella E. T. & Terenzini P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Picus L., Marion S., Calvo N. & Glenn W. (2005). Understanding the relationship between student achievement and the quality of educational facilities: Evidence from Wyoming. Peabody Journal of Education, 30 (3), 71-95.
  • Rautopuro J. & Vaisanen P. (2000). Keep the customer satisfied: A longitudinal study of students’ emotions, experiences and achievement. Paper presented at The European Conference on Educational Research, Edinburgh, 20-23 September 2000.
  • Sanusi J. O. (2007). An exploratory study of undergraduate classroom experiences and occupational attainment in alumni satisfaction with university experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
  • Strange C. C. & Banning J. H. (2001). Educating by design: Creating campus learning environments that works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sturrock S. (2007). Handbook. Today’s student: Tomorrow’s alumnus. Cultivating good alumni relationships in conservatories. Association Europeene des Conservatoires, Academies de Musique et Musikhochshulen (AEC).
  • Thomas E. H. & Galambos N. (2004). What satisfies students? Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Research in Higher Education, 45 (3), 251-269.
  • Tinto V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Transportation Research Board Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2005). Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. URL: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr282.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2011).
  • Watson L. (2007). Building the future of learning. European Journal of Education, 42 (2), 255-263.
  • Woolner P., Hall E., Higgins S., McCaughey C. & Wall K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools in the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33 (1), 47-70.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.