Efficient mRNA Polyadenylation Requires a Ubiquitin-Like Domain, a Zinc Knuckle, and a RING Finger Domain, All Contained in the Mpe1 Protein

REFERENCES

• Elkon R, Ugalde AP, Agami R. 2013. Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation: extent, regulation and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:496–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber JH, Nazeer FI, Yeh PC, Kuehner JN, Borikar S, Hoskinson D, Moore CL. 2013. DNA damage induces targeted, genome-wide variation of poly(A) sites in budding yeast. Genome Res. 23:1690–1703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.144964.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian B, Manley JL. 2013. Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation: the long and short of it. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38:312–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2013.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan S, Choi EA, Shi Y. 2011. Pre-mRNA 3′-end processing complex assembly and function. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2:321–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wrna.54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmon SK, Lutz CS. 2012. mRNA 3′ end processing factors: a phylogenetic comparison. Comp. Funct. Genomics 2012:876893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/876893.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millevoi S, Vagner S. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic pre-mRNA 3′ end processing regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:2757–2774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo LT, Minet M, Schmitter JM, Lacroute F, Wyers F. 2001. Mpe1, a zinc knuckle protein, is an essential component of yeast cleavage and polyadenylation factor required for the cleavage and polyadenylation of mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:8346–8356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.24.8346-8356.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh DJ, Eiso AB, Faro A, Lutya PT, Hoffmann E, Rees DJ. 2006. DWNN, a novel ubiquitin-like domain, implicates RBBP6 in mRNA processing and ubiquitin-like pathways. BMC Struct. Biol. 6:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-6-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simons A, Melamed-Bessudo C, Wolkowicz R, Sperling J, Sperling R, Eisenbach L, Rotter V. 1997. PACT: cloning and characterization of a cellular p53 binding protein that interacts with Rb. Oncogene 14:145–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1200825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi Y, Di Giammartino DC, Taylor D, Sarkeshik A, Rice WJ, Yates JRIII, Frank J, Manley JL. 2009. Molecular architecture of the human pre-mRNA 3′ processing complex. Mol. Cell 33:365–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicke L, Schubert HL, Hill CP. 2005. Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:610–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel C, Serrano L. 2006. The ubiquitin domain superfold: structure-based sequence alignments and characterization of binding epitopes. J. Mol. Biol. 355:821–844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su V, Lau AF. 2009. Ubiquitin-like and ubiquitin-associated domain proteins: significance in proteasomal degradation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66:2819–2833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0048-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali PS, Ghoshdastider U, Hoffmann J, Brutschy B, Filipek S. 2012. Recognition of the let-7g miRNA precursor by human Lin28B. FEBS Lett. 586:3986–3990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.09.034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavaloc Y, Bourgeois CF, Kister L, Stevenin J. 1999. The splicing factors 9G8 and SRp20 transactivate splicing through different and specific enhancers. RNA 5:468–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355838299981967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasken MB, Leung SW, Banerjee A, Kodani MO, Chavez R, Bowman EA, Purohit MK, Rubinson ME, Rubinson EH, Corbett AH. 2011. Air1 zinc knuckles 4 and 5 and a conserved IWRXY motif are critical for the function and integrity of the Trf4/5-Air1/2-Mtr4 polyadenylation (TRAMP) RNA quality control complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286:37429–37445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.271494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrey SM, Voelker R, Berglund JA. 2006. An extended RNA binding site for the yeast branch point-binding protein and the role of its zinc knuckle domains in RNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. 281:27443–27453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603137200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holub P, Lalakova J, Cerna H, Pasulka J, Sarazova M, Hrazdilova K, Arce MS, Hobor F, Stefl R, Vanacova S. 2012. Air2p is critical for the assembly and RNA-binding of the TRAMP complex and the KOW domain of Mtr4p is crucial for exosome activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:5679–5693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin FE, Gebert LF, Towbin H, Brunschweiger A, Hall J, Allain FH. 2012. Structural basis of pre-let-7 miRNA recognition by the zinc knuckles of pluripotency factor Lin28. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:84–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu K, Heng X, Summers MF. 2011. Structural determinants and mechanism of HIV-1 genome packaging. J. Mol. Biol. 410:609–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. 2009. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:399–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama S, Nakayama KI. 2003. U-box proteins as a new family of ubiquitin ligases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 302:635–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00245-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kappo MA, Eiso AB, Hassem F, Atkinson RA, Faro A, Muleya V, Mulaudzi T, Poole JO, McKenzie JM, Chibi M, Moolman-Smook JC, Rees DJ, Pugh DJ. 2012. Solution structure of RING finger-like domain of retinoblastoma-binding protein-6 (RBBP6) suggests it functions as a U-box. J. Biol. Chem. 287:7146–7158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.217059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger MB, Pruneda JN, Klevit RE, Weissman AM. 2014. RING-type E3 ligases: master manipulators of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and ubiquitination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843:47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe T. 2005. Multiubiquitylation by E4 enzymes: ‘one size' doesn't fit all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30:183–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2005.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibi M, Meyer M, Skepu A, Rees DJG, Moolman-Smook JC, Pugh DJR. 2008. RBBP6 interacts with multifunctional protein YB-1 through its RING finger domain, leading to ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation of YB-1. J. Mol. Biol. 384:908–916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Deng B, Xing G, Teng Y, Tian C, Cheng X, Yin X, Yang J, Gao X, Zhu Y, Sun Q, Zhang L, Yang X, He F. 2007. PACT is a negative regulator of p53 and essential for cell growth and embryonic development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:7951–7956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701916104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellare P, Small EC, Huang X, Wohlschlegel JA, Staley JP, Sontheimer EJ. 2008. A role for ubiquitin in the spliceosome assembly pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:444–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng F, Wenzel S, Tansey WP. 2012. Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81:177–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-052110-120012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song EJ, Werner SL, Neubauer J, Stegmeier F, Aspden J, Rio D, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Kirschner MW, Rape M. 2010. The Prp19 complex and the Usp4Sart3 deubiquitinating enzyme control reversible ubiquitination at the spliceosome. Genes Dev. 24:1434–1447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1925010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutucci E, Stutz F. 2011. Keeping mRNPs in check during assembly and nuclear export. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:377–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos PC, Hockendorff J, Johnson ES, Varshavsky A, Dohmen RJ. 1998. Ump1p is required for proper maturation of the 20S proteasome and becomes its substrate upon completion of the assembly. Cell 92:489–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80942-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilt W, Enenkel C, Gruhler A, Singer T, Wolf DH. 1993. The PRE4 gene codes for a subunit of the yeast proteasome necessary for peptidylglutamyl-peptide-hydrolyzing activity. Mutations link the proteasome to stress- and ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 268:3479–3486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Moore C. 2005. Regulation of yeast mRNA 3′ end processing by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 19:619–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James P, Halladay J, Craig EA. 1996. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR. 1997. ‘Marker swap' plasmids: convenient tools for budding yeast molecular genetics. Yeast 13:647–653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19970615)13:7<647::AID-YEA115>3.0.CO;2-#.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boeke JD, Trueheart J, Natsoulis G, Fink GR. 1987. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 154:164–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)54076-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Kessler M, Helmling S, O'Connor JP, Moore C. 1999. Pta1, a component of yeast CF II, is required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition of mRNA precursor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7733–7740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstrasser M, Ellison MJ, Chau V, Varshavsky A. 1991. The short-lived MATα2 transcriptional regulator is ubiquitinated in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88:4606–4610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.11.4606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross S, Moore C. 2001. Five subunits are required for reconstitution of the cleavage and polyadenylation activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cleavage factor I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:6080–6085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101046598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmling S, Zhelkovsky A, Moore CL. 2001. Fip1 regulates the activity of poly(A) polymerase through multiple interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2026–2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.6.2026-2037.2001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler JS, Sadhale PP, Platt T. 1990. RNA processing in vitro produces mature 3′ ends of a variety of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:2599–2605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dichtl B, Keller W. 2001. Recognition of polyadenylation sites in yeast pre-mRNAs by cleavage and polyadenylation factor. EMBO J. 20:3197–3209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.12.3197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G, Rutz B, Bouveret E, Bragado-Nilsson E, Wilm M, Seraphin B. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24:218–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GM, Stalker J, Humphray S, West A, Cox T, Rogers J, Dunham I, Prelich G. 2008. A systematic library for comprehensive overexpression screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Methods 5:239–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghazy MA, He X, Singh BN, Hampsey M, Moore C. 2009. The essential N terminus of the Pta1 scaffold protein is required for snoRNA transcription termination and Ssu72 function but is dispensable for pre-mRNA 3′-end processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:2296–2307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01514-08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezeokonkwo C, Ghazy MA, Zhelkovsky A, Yeh PC, Moore C. 2012. Novel interactions at the essential N-terminus of poly(A) polymerase that could regulate poly(A) addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 586:1173–1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Guzman RN, Wu ZR, Stalling CC, Pappalardo L, Borer PN, Summers MF. 1998. Structure of the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein bound to the SL3 psi-RNA recognition element. Science 279:384–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5349.384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabino SM, Ohnacker M, Keller W. 2000. Distinct roles of two Yth1p domains in 3′-end cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast pre-mRNAs. EMBO J. 19:3778–3787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.14.3778.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dichtl B, Blank D, Sadowski M, Hubner W, Weiser S, Keller W. 2002. Yhh1p/Cft1p directly links poly(A) site recognition and RNA polymerase II transcription termination. EMBO J. 21:4125–4135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graber JH, McAllister GD, Smith TF. 2002. Probabilistic prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3′-processing sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1851–1858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.8.1851.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bucheli ME, He X, Kaplan CD, Moore CL, Buratowski S. 2007. Polyadenylation site choice in yeast is affected by competition between Npl3 and polyadenylation factor CFI. RNA 13:1756–1764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.607207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Khan AU, Cheng H, Pappas DLJr, Hampsey M, Moore CL. 2003. Functional interactions between the transcription and mRNA 3′ end processing machineries mediated by Ssu72 and Sub1. Genes Dev. 17:1030–1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1075203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley D. 2009. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:477–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081507.101607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos PC, Marques AJ, London MK, Dohmen RJ. 2004. Role of C-terminal extensions of subunits β2 and β7 in assembly and activity of eukaryotic proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:14323–14330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308757200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dikic I, Wakatsuki S, Walters KJ. 2009. Ubiquitin-binding domains—from structures to functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:659–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma R, Peters NR, D'Onofrio M, Tochtrop GP, Sakamoto KM, Varadan R, Zhang M, Coffino P, Fushman D, Deshaies RJ, King RW. 2004. Ubistatins inhibit proteasome-dependent degradation by binding the ubiquitin chain. Science 306:117–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1100946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DH, Goldberg AL. 1998. Proteasome inhibitors cause induction of heat shock proteins and trehalose, which together confer thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:30–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adachi K, Lakka V, Zhao Y, Surrey S. 2004. Ubiquitylation of nascent globin chains in a cell-free system. J. Biol. Chem. 279:41767–41774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405059200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavelin I, Beer A, Kam Z, Rotter V, Oren M, Navon A, Geiger B. 2009. Discovery of novel proteasome inhibitors using a high-content cell-based screening system. PLoS One 4:e8503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi N, Moore C. 2000. Posttranslational phosphorylation and ubiquitination of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase at the S/G2 stage of the cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2794–2802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.8.2794-2802.2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Gonzalez M, Kabbaj MH, Gunjan A. 2012. Novel E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate histone protein levels in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 7:e36295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:4569–4574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061034498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Cheng D, Marsischky G, Roelofs J, Finley D, Gygi SP. 2003. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:921–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Kee Y, Huibregtse JM, Piper RC. 2007. Hse1, a component of the yeast Hrs-STAM ubiquitin-sorting complex, associates with ubiquitin peptidases and a ligase to control sorting efficiency into multivesicular bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell 18:324–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-06-0557.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, Sahalie J, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Gebreab F, Li N, Simonis N, Hao T, Rual JF, Dricot A, Vazquez A, Murray RR, Simon C, Tardivo L, Tam S, Svrzikapa N, Fan C, de Smet AS, Motyl A, Hudson ME, Park J, Xin X, Cusick ME, Moore T, Boone C, Snyder M, Roth FP, Barabasi AL, Tavernier J, Hill DE, Vidal M. 2008. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322:104–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Olmo M, Mizrahi N, Gross S, Moore CL. 1997. The Uba2 and Ufd1 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae interact with poly(A) polymerase and affect the polyadenylation activity of cell extracts. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255:209–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004380050491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley JL. 2007. Sumoylation modulates the assembly and activity of the pre-mRNA 3′ processing complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:8848–8858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01186-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley JL. 2008. Sumoylation regulates multiple aspects of mammalian poly(A) polymerase function. Genes Dev. 22:499–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1628208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saguez C, Schmid M, Olesen JR, Ghazy MA, Qu X, Poulsen MB, Nasser T, Moore C, Jensen TH. 2008. Nuclear mRNA surveillance in THO/sub2 mutants is triggered by inefficient polyadenylation. Mol. Cell 31:91–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gwizdek C, Iglesias N, Rodriguez MS, Ossareh-Nazari B, Hobeika M, Divita G, Stutz F, Dargemont C. 2006. Ubiquitin-associated domain of Mex67 synchronizes recruitment of the mRNA export machinery with transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:16376–16381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607941103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Libri D, Dower K, Boulay J, Thomsen R, Rosbash M, Jensen TH. 2002. Interactions between mRNA export commitment, 3′-end quality control, and nuclear degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8254–8266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.23.8254-8266.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SA, Kim H, Erickson B, Bentley DL. 2011. The export factor Yra1 modulates mRNA 3′ end processing. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:1164–1171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias N, Tutucci E, Gwizdek C, Vinciguerra P, Von Dach E, Corbett AH, Dargemont C, Stutz F. 2010. Ubiquitin-mediated mRNP dynamics and surveillance prior to budding yeast mRNA export. Genes Dev. 24:1927–1938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.583310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitaliano-Prunier A, Babour A, Herissant L, Apponi L, Margaritis T, Holstege FC, Corbett AH, Gwizdek C, Dargemont C. 2012. H2B ubiquitylation controls the formation of export-competent mRNP. Mol. Cell 45:132–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandel CR, Bai Y, Tong L. 2008. Protein factors in pre-mRNA 3′-end processing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65:1099–1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-7474-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano F, Bye H, Duncan LM, Buchet-Poyau K, Billaud M, Wills MR, Lehner PJ. 2012. The RNA-binding E3 ubiquitin ligase MEX-3C links ubiquitination with MHC-I mRNA degradation. EMBO J. 31:3596–3606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano F, Miranda-Saavedra D, Lehner PJ. 2010. RNA-binding E3 ubiquitin ligases: novel players in nucleic acid regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38:1621–1626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0381621.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biderman L, Manley JL, Prives C. 2012. Mdm2 and MdmX as regulators of gene expression. Genes Cancer 3:264–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947601912455331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naski N, Gajjar M, Bourougaa K, Malbert-Colas L, Fahraeus R, Candeias MM. 2009. The p53 mRNA-Mdm2 interaction. Cell Cycle 8:31–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.1.7326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried NT, Xu P, Duong DM, Cheng D, Hanfelt J, Peng J. 2008. Systematic approach for validating the ubiquitinated proteome. Anal. Chem. 80:4161–4169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac702516a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swaney DL, Beltrao P, Starita L, Guo A, Rush J, Fields S, Krogan NJ, Villen J. 2013. Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat. Methods 10:676–682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar