Noncoding Transcription Is a Driving Force for Nucleosome Instability in spt16 Mutant Cells

REFERENCES

• Haushalter KA, Kadonaga JT. 2003. Chromatin assembly by DNA-translocating motors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:613–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ransom M, Dennehey BK, Tyler JK. 2010. Chaperoning histones during DNA replication and repair. Cell 140:183–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh S, Workman JL. 2015. Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:178–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger K. 2006. Dynamic nucleosomes. Chromosome Res 14:5–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-005-1026-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. 2007. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 128:721–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess RJ, Zhang Z. 2013. Histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and human disease. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:14–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szenker E, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G. 2011. The double face of the histone variant H3.3. Cell Res 21:421–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Long C, Chen X, Huang C, Chen S, Zhu B. 2010. Partitioning of histone H3-H4 tetramers during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Science 328:94–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1178994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan T, Liu CL, Erkmann JA, Holik J, Grunstein M, Kaufman PD, Friedman N, Rando OJ. 2008. Cell cycle- and chaperone-mediated regulation of H3K56ac incorporation in yeast. PLoS Genet 4:e1000270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamai A, Imoberdorf RM, Strubin M. 2007. Continuous histone H2B and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast cells outside of replication. Mol Cell 25:345–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufiange A, Jacques PE, Bhat W, Robert F, Nourani A. 2007. Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. Mol Cell 27:393–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Friedman N, Rando OJ. 2007. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315:1405–1408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. 2007. Histone replacement marks the boundaries of cis-regulatory domains. Science 315:1408–1411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Pugh BF. 2009. A compiled and systematic reference map of nucleosome positions across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Genome Biol 10:R109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pugh BF. 2010. A preoccupied position on nucleosomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb0810-923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, Field Y, LeProust EM, Hughes TR, Lieb JD, Widom J, Segal E. 2009. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458:362–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wippo CJ, Wal M, Ward E, Korber P, Pugh BF. 2011. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332:977–980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1200508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teves SS, Henikoff S. 2014. Transcription-generated torsional stress destabilizes nucleosomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:88–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinberg D, Sims RJ, III. 2006. de FACTo nucleosome dynamics. J Biol Chem 281:23297–23301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R600007200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin H, Takahata S, Blanksma M, McCullough L, Stillman DJ, Formosa T. 2009. yFACT induces global accessibility of nucleosomal DNA without H2A-H2B displacement. Mol Cell 35:365–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler DD, Luger K. 2011. The histone chaperone FACT: structural insights and mechanisms for nucleosome reorganization. J Biol Chem 286:18369–18374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R110.180778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone EA, Clark CD, Chiang A, Winston F. 1991. Mutations in SPT16/CDC68 suppress cis- and trans-acting mutations that affect promoter function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11:5710–5717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.11.11.5710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamai A, Puglisi A, Strubin M. 2009. Histone chaperone Spt16 promotes redeposition of the original H3-H4 histones evicted by elongating RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 35:377–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bakel H, Tsui K, Gebbia M, Mnaimneh S, Hughes TR, Nislow C. 2013. A compendium of nucleosome and transcript profiles reveals determinants of chromatin architecture and transcription. PLoS Genet 9:e1003479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Moyano E, Mergui X, Garcia-Rubio ML, Barroso S, Aguilera A. 2014. The yeast and human FACT chromatin-reorganizing complexes solve R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts. Genes Dev 28:735–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.234070.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung V, Chua G, Batada NN, Landry CR, Michnick SW, Hughes TR, Winston F. 2008. Chromatin- and transcription-related factors repress transcription from within coding regions throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Biol 6:e277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeronimo C, Watanabe S, Kaplan CD, Peterson CL, Robert F. 2015. The histone chaperones FACT and Spt6 restrict H2A.Z from intragenic locations. Mol Cell 58:1113–1123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Zhou H, Wurtele H, Davies B, Horazdovsky B, Verreault A, Zhang Z. 2008. Acetylation of histone H3 lysine 56 regulates replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Cell 134:244–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Li Q, McCullough L, Kettelkamp C, Formosa T, Zhang Z. 2010. Ubiquitylation of FACT by the Cullin-E3 ligase Rtt101 connects FACT to DNA replication. Genes Dev 24:1485–1490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1887310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltman M, Evrin C, De Piccoli G, Jones RC, Edmondson RD, Katou Y, Nakato R, Shirahige K, Labib K. 2013. Eukaryotic replisome components cooperate to process histones during chromosome replication. Cell Rep 3:892–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton ML, Galani K, Kang S, Bell SP, MacAlpine DM. 2010. Conserved nucleosome positioning defines replication origins. Genes Dev 24:748–753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1913210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Xi Y, Pan X, Li Z, Kaestner K, Tyler J, Dent S, He X, Li W. 2013. DANPOS: dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing. Genome Res 23:341–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.142067.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2008. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320:1344–1349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt ME, Brown TA, Trumpower BL. 1990. A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 18:3091–3092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.10.3091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. 2009. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25:1105–1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 28:511–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Liu T, Qin B, Zhang Y, Liu XS. 2012. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat Protoc 7:1728–1740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Wei W, Gagneur J, Perocchi F, Clauder-Munster S, Camblong J, Guffanti E, Stutz F, Huber W, Steinmetz LM. 2009. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast. Nature 457:1033–1037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk EL, Chen CL, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Gourvennec S, Kwapisz M, Roche V, Bertrand C, Silvain M, Legoix-Ne P, Loeillet S, Nicolas A, Thermes C, Morillon A. 2011. XUTs are a class of Xrn1-sensitive antisense regulatory non-coding RNA in yeast. Nature 475:114–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner A, Hughes A, Yassour M, Rando OJ, Friedman N. 2010. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. Genome Res 20:90–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.098509.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner GE, Tsukiyama T, Henikoff S. 2013. ISWI and CHD chromatin remodelers bind promoters but act in gene bodies. PLoS Genet 9:e1003317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulze JM, Hentrich T, Nakanishi S, Gupta A, Emberly E, Shilatifard A, Kobor MS. 2011. Splitting the task: Ubp8 and Ubp10 deubiquitinate different cellular pools of H2BK123. Genes Dev 25:2242–2247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.177220.111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillemette B, Drogaris P, Lin HH, Armstrong H, Hiragami-Hamada K, Imhof A, Bonneil E, Thibault P, Verreault A, Festenstein RJ. 2011. H3 lysine 4 is acetylated at active gene promoters and is regulated by H3 lysine 4 methylation. PLoS Genet 7:e1001354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batta K, Zhang Z, Yen K, Goffman DB, Pugh BF. 2011. Genome-wide function of H2B ubiquitylation in promoter and genic regions. Genes Dev 25:2254–2265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.177238.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavri R, Zhu B, Li G, Trojer P, Mandal S, Shilatifard A, Reinberg D. 2006. Histone H2B monoubiquitination functions cooperatively with FACT to regulate elongation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 125:703–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCava J, Houseley J, Saveanu C, Petfalski E, Thompson E, Jacquier A, Tollervey D. 2005. RNA degradation by the exosome is promoted by a nuclear polyadenylation complex. Cell 121:713–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanacova S, Wolf J, Martin G, Blank D, Dettwiler S, Friedlein A, Langen H, Keith G, Keller W. 2005. A new yeast poly(A) polymerase complex involved in RNA quality control. PLoS Biol 3:e189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch JL, Tan BC, Panov KI, Panova TB, Andersen JS, Owen-Hughes TA, Russell J, Lee SC, Zomerdijk JC. 2009. FACT facilitates chromatin transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. EMBO J 28:854–865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruppa M, Moir RD, Kolodrubetz D, Willis IM. 2001. Nhp6, an HMG1 protein, functions in SNR6 transcription by RNA polymerase III in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 7:309–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00179-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formosa T, Eriksson P, Wittmeyer J, Ginn J, Yu Y, Stillman DJ. 2001. Spt16-Pob3 and the HMG protein Nhp6 combine to form the nucleosome-binding factor SPN. EMBO J 20:3506–3517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.13.3506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolle M, Workman JL. 2013. Transcription-associated histone modifications and cryptic transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829:84–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan CD, Laprade L, Winston F. 2003. Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 301:1096–1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1087374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil H, Malabat C, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Xu Z, Steinmetz LM, Jacquier A. 2009. Widespread bidirectional promoters are the major source of cryptic transcripts in yeast. Nature 457:1038–1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core LJ, Waterfall JJ, Lis JT. 2008. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322:1845–1848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seila AC, Calabrese JM, Levine SS, Yeo GW, Rahl PB, Flynn RA, Young RA, Sharp PA. 2008. Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science 322:1849–1851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam MT, Li W, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK. 2014. Enhancer RNAs and regulated transcriptional programs. Trends Biochem Sci 39:170–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natoli G, Andrau JC. 2012. Noncoding transcription at enhancers: general principles and functional models. Annu Rev Genet 46:1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi K, Zare H, Dell'orso S, Grontved L, Gutierrez-Cruz G, Derfoul A, Hager GL, Sartorelli V. 2013. eRNAs promote transcription by establishing chromatin accessibility at defined genomic loci. Mol Cell 51:606–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse I, Rando OJ, Delrow J, Tsukiyama T. 2007. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450:1031–1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celona B, Weiner A, Di Felice F, Mancuso FM, Cesarini E, Rossi RL, Gregory L, Baban D, Rossetti G, Grianti P, Pagani M, Bonaldi T, Ragoussis J, Friedman N, Camilloni G, Bianchi ME, Agresti A. 2011. Substantial histone reduction modulates genomewide nucleosomal occupancy and global transcriptional output. PLoS Biol 9:e1001086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossett AJ, Lieb JD. 2012. In vivo effects of histone H3 depletion on nucleosome occupancy and position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 8:e1002771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim YS, Choi Y, Kang K, Cho K, Oh S, Lee J, Grewal SI, Lee D. 2012. Hrp3 controls nucleosome positioning to suppress non-coding transcription in eu- and heterochromatin. EMBO J 31:4375–4387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennig BP, Bendrin K, Zhou Y, Fischer T. 2012. Chd1 chromatin remodelers maintain nucleosome organization and repress cryptic transcription. EMBO Rep 13:997–1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pointner J, Persson J, Prasad P, Norman-Axelsson U, Stralfors A, Khorosjutina O, Krietenstein N, Svensson JP, Ekwall K, Korber P. 2012. CHD1 remodelers regulate nucleosome spacing in vitro and align nucleosomal arrays over gene coding regions in S. pombe. EMBO J 31:4388–4403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGennaro CM, Alver BH, Marguerat S, Stepanova E, Davis CP, Bahler J, Park PJ, Winston F. 2013. Spt6 regulates intragenic and antisense transcription, nucleosome positioning, and histone modifications genome-wide in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 33:4779–4792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01068-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lickwar CR, Rao B, Shabalin AA, Nobel AB, Strahl BD, Lieb JD. 2009. The Set2/Rpd3S pathway suppresses cryptic transcription without regard to gene length or transcription frequency. PLoS One 4:e4886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004886.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu CL, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Schreiber SL, Friedman N, Rando OJ. 2005. Single-nucleosome mapping of histone modifications in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 3:e328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmizis A, Santos-Rosa H, Penkett CJ, Singer MA, Vermeulen M, Mann M, Bahler J, Green RD, Kouzarides T. 2007. Arginine methylation at histone H3R2 controls deposition of H3K4 trimethylation. Nature 449:928–932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz D, Schwalb B, Kiesel A, Baejen C, Torkler P, Gagneur J, Soeding J, Cramer P. 2013. Transcriptome surveillance by selective termination of noncoding RNA synthesis. Cell 155:1075–1087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar