Function and Control of RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Phosphorylation in Vertebrate Transcription and RNA Processing

REFERENCES

• Buratowski S. 2009. Progression through the RNA polymerase II CTD cycle. Mol. Cell 36:541–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MJ, Proudfoot NJ. 2009. Pre-mRNA processing reaches back to transcription and ahead to translation. Cell 136:688–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsin JP, Manley JL. 2012. The RNA polymerase II CTD coordinates transcription and RNA processing. Genes Dev. 26:2119–2137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.200303.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidemann M, Hintermair C, Voss K, Eick D. 2013. Dynamic phosphorylation patterns of RNA polymerase II CTD during transcription. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829:55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.08.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff S, Dienstbier M, Murphy S. 2012. Updating the RNA polymerase CTD code: adding gene-specific layers. Trends Genet. 28:333–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover-Cutter K, Larochelle S, Erickson B, Zhang C, Shokat K, Fisher RP, Bentley DL. 2009. TFIIH-associated Cdk7 kinase functions in phosphorylation of C-terminal domain Ser7 residues, promoter-proximal pausing, and termination by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:5455–5464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00637-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar MS, Heidemann M, Tietjen JR, Zhang DW, Chapman RD, Eick D, Ansari AZ. 2009. TFIIH kinase places bivalent marks on the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 34:387–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho EJ, Kobor MS, Kim M, Greenblatt J, Buratowski S. 2001. Opposing effects of Ctk1 kinase and Fcp1 phosphatase at Ser 2 of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 15:3319–3329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.935901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall NF, Peng J, Xie Z, Price DH. 1996. Control of RNA polymerase II elongation potential by a novel carboxyl-terminal domain kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 271:27176–27183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.43.27176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartkowiak B, Liu P, Phatnani HP, Fuda NJ, Cooper JJ, Price DH, Adelman K, Lis JT, Greenleaf AL. 2010. CDK12 is a transcription elongation-associated CTD kinase, the metazoan ortholog of yeast Ctk1. Genes Dev. 24:2303–2316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1968210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazek D, Kohoutek J, Bartholomeeusen K, Johansen E, Hulinkova P, Luo Z, Cimermancic P, Ule J, Peterlin BM. 2011. The cyclin K/Cdk12 complex maintains genomic stability via regulation of expression of DNA damage response genes. Genes Dev. 25:2158–2172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.16962311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran R, Dahmus ME, Wang JYJ. 1993. Tyrosine phosphorylation of mammalian RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90:11167–11171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.23.11167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer A, Heidemann M, Lidschreiber M, Schreieck A, Sun M, Hintermair C, Kremmer E, Eick D, Cramer P. 2012. CTD tyrosine phosphorylation impairs termination factor recruitment to RNA polymerase II. Science 336:1723–1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1219651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsin JP, Sheth A, Manley JL. 2011. RNAP II CTD phosphorylated on threonine-4 is required for histone mRNA 3′-end processing. Science 334:683–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1206034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintermair C, Heidemann M, Koch F, Descostes N, Gut M, Gut I, Fenouil R, Ferrier P, Flatley A, Kremmer E, Chapman RD, Andrau JC, Eick D. 2012. Threonine-4 of mammalian RNA polymerase II CTD is targeted by Polo-like kinase 3 and required for transcriptional elongation. EMBO J. 31:2784–2797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann S, Shuman S. 2002. Characterization of the CTD phosphatase Fcp1 from fission yeast. Preferential dephosphorylation of serine 2 versus serine 5. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21213–21220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202056200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bataille AR, Jeronimo C, Jacques PE, Laramee L, Fortin ME, Forest A, Bergeron M, Hanes SD, Robert F. 2012. A universal RNA polymerase II CTD cycle is orchestrated by complex interplays between kinase, phosphatase, and isomerase enzymes along genes. Mol. Cell 45:158–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang DW, Mosley AL, Ramisetty SR, Rodriguez-Molina JB, Washburn MP, Ansari AZ. 2012. Ssu72 phosphatase-dependent erasure of phospho-Ser7 marks on the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain is essential for viability and transcription termination. J. Biol. Chem. 287:8541–8551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.335687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang K, Nagaike T, Xiang S, Kilic T, Beh MM, Manley JL, Tong L. 2010. Crystal structure of the human symplekin-Ssu72-CTD phosphopeptide complex. Nature 467:729–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang K, Manley JL, Tong L. 2012. An unexpected binding mode for a Pol II CTD peptide phosphorylated at Ser7 in the active site of the CTD phosphatase Ssu72. Genes Dev. 26:2265–2270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.198853.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley AL, Pattenden SG, Carey M, Venkatesh S, Gilmore JM, Florens L, Workman JL, Washburn MP. 2009. Rtr1 is a CTD phosphatase that regulates RNA polymerase II during the transition from serine 5 to serine 2 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 34:168–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff S, Zaborowska J, Laitem C, Kiss T, Murphy S. 2012. Ser7 phosphorylation of the CTD recruits the RPAP2 Ser5 phosphatase to snRNA genes. Mol. Cell 45:111–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang K, Manley JL, Tong L. 2012. The yeast regulator of transcription protein Rtr1 lacks an active site and phosphatase activity. Nat. Commun. 3:946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietjen JR, Zhang DW, Rodriguez-Molina JB, White BE, Akhtar MS, Heidemann M, Li X, Chapman RD, Shokat K, Keles S, Eick D, Ansari AZ. 2010. Chemical-genomic dissection of the CTD code. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:1154–1161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Erickson B, Luo W, Seward D, Graber JH, Pollock DD, Megee PC, Bentley DL. 2010. Gene-specific RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and the CTD code. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:1279–1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1913.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer A, Lidschreiber M, Siebert M, Leike K, Soding J, Cramer P. 2010. Uniform transitions of the general RNA polymerase II transcription complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:1272–1278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CK, Shuman S. 1999. Distinct roles for CTD Ser-2 and Ser-5 phosphorylation in the recruitment and allosteric activation of mammalian mRNA capping enzyme. Mol. Cell 3:405–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80468-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrega C, Shen V, Shuman S, Lima CD. 2003. Structure of an mRNA capping enzyme bound to the phosphorylated carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 11:1549–1561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00187-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwer B, Shuman S. 2011. Deciphering the RNA polymerase II CTD code in fission yeast. Mol. Cell 43:311–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DP, Greenleaf AL. 2000. The splicing factor, Prp40, binds the phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem. 275:39935–39943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M004118200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David CJ, Boyne AR, Millhouse SR, Manley JL. 2011. The RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain promotes splicing activation through recruitment of a U2AF65-Prp19 complex. Genes Dev. 25:972–983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2038011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong N, Bentley DL. 2001. Capping, splicing, and 3′-processing are independently stimulated by RNA polymerase II: different functions for different segments of the CTD. Genes Dev. 15:1783–1795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.889101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Z, Schwartz BE, Werner J, Suarez JR, Lis JT. 2004. Coordination of transcription, RNA processing, and surveillance by P-TEFb kinase on heat shock genes. Mol. Cell 13:55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00526-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff S, O'Reilly D, Chapman RD, Taylor A, Tanzhaus K, Pitts L, Eick D, Murphy S. 2007. Serine-7 of the RNA polymerase II CTD is specifically required for snRNA gene expression. Science 318:1777–1779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1145989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West ML, Gorden JL. 1995. Construction and analysis of yeast RNA polymerase II CTD deletion and substitution mutations. Genetics 140:1223–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiller JW, McConaughy BL, Hall BD. 2000. Evolutionary complementation for polymerase II CTD function. Yeast 16:57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(20000115)16:1<57::AID-YEA509>3.0.CO;2-E.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman RD, Heidemann M, Albert TK, Mailhammer R, Flatley A, Meisterernst M, Kremmer E, Eick D. 2007. Transcribing RNA polymerase II is phosphorylated at CTD residue serine-7. Science 318:1780–1782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1145977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirngruber J, Shchebet A, Schreiber L, Shema E, Minsky N, Chapman RD, Eick D, Aylon Y, Oren M, Johnsen SA. 2009. CDK9 directs H2B monoubiquitination and controls replication-dependent histone mRNA 3′-end processing. EMBO Rep. 10:894–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman M. 2001. Ribonuclease protection assay. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. Chapter 4:Unit4.7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb0407s24.
   Google Scholar
• Larochelle S, Batliner J, Gamble MJ, Barboza NM, Kraybill BC, Blethrow JD, Shokat KM, Fisher RP. 2006. Dichotomous but stringent substrate selection by the dual-function Cdk7 complex revealed by chemical genetics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose Y, Manley JL. 1998. RNA polymerase II is an essential mRNA polyadenylation factor. Nature 395:93–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/25786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamenski T, Heilmeier S, Meinhart A, Cramer P. 2004. Structure and mechanism of RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatases. Mol. Cell 15:399–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Shuman S, Lima CD. 2008. The structure of Fcp1, an essential RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatase. Mol. Cell 32:478–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eick D, Geyer M. 2013. The RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) code. Chem. Rev. 113:8456–8490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr400071f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RD, Conrad M, Eick D. 2005. Role of the mammalian RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain (CTD) nonconsensus repeats in CTD stability and cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:7665–7674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.17.7665-7674.2005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman RD, Palancade B, Lang A, Bendaude O, Eick D. 2004. The last CTD repeat of the mammalian RNA polymerase II large subunit is important for its stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:35–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolomei MS, Halden NF, Cullen CR, Corden JL. 1988. Genetic analysis of the repetitive carboxyl-terminal domain of the largest subunit of mouse RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:330–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassart C, Drogat J, Migeot V, Hermand D. 2012. Distinct requirement of RNA polymerase II CTD phosphorylations in budding and fission yeast. Transcription 3:231–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/trns.21066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egloff S, Szczepaniak SA, Dienstbier M, Taylor A, Knight S, Murphy S. 2010. The integrator complex recognizes a new double mark on the RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain. J. Biol. Chem. 285:20564–20569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.132530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosonina E, Blencowe BJ. 2004. Analysis of the requirement for RNA polymerase II CTD heptapeptide repeats in pre-mRNA splicing and 3′-end cleavage. RNA 10:581–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.5207204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin JE, Uguen P, Taylor A, Bentley DL, Murphy S. 2003. The C-terminal domain of pol II and a DRB-sensitive kinase are required for 3′-processing of U2 snRNA. EMBO J. 22:925–934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong N, Bird G, Vigneron M, Bentley DL. 2003. A 10 residue motif at the C-terminus of the RNA pol II CTD is required for transcription, splicing and 3′-end processing. EMBO J. 22:4274–4282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larochelle S, Amat R, Glover-Cutter K, Sanso M, Zhang C, Allen JJ, Shokat KM, Bentley DL, Fisher RP. 2012. Cyclin-dependent kinase control of the initiation-to-elongation switch of RNA polymerase II. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:1108–1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SH, Kim M, Buratowski S. 2004. Phosphorylation of serine 2 within the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain couples transcription and 3′-end processing. Mol. Cell 13:67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00492-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird G, Zorio DA, Bentley DL. 2004. RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain phosphorylation is required for cotranscriptional pre-mRNA splicing and 3′-end formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8963–8969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.20.8963-8969.2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu B, Eick D, Bensaude O. 2013. CTD serine-2 plays a critical role in splicing and termination factor recruitment to RNA polymerase II in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:1591–1603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornemann J, Kotovic KM, Hujer K, Neugebauer KM. 2005. Cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly occurs in a stepwise fashion and requires the cap binding complex. Mol. Cell 19:53–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover-Cutter K, Kim S, Espinosa J, Bentley DL. 2008. RNA polymerase II pauses and associates with pre-mRNA processing factors at both ends of genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Li T, Rahl PB, Adamson TE, Loudas NB, Guo J, Varzavand K, Cooper JJ, Hu X, Gnatt A, Young RA, Price DH. 2012. Functional association of Gdown1 with RNA polymerase II poised on human genes. Mol. Cell 45:38–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartkowiak B, Greenleaf AL. 2011. Phosphorylation of RNAPII: To P-TEFb or not to P-TEFb? Transcription 2:115–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/trns.2.3.15004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsao DC, Park NJ, Nag A, Martinson HG. 2012. Prolonged alpha-amanitin treatment of cells for studying mutated polymerases causes degradation of DSIF160 and other proteins. RNA 18:222–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.030452.111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandal SS, Chu C, Wada T, Handa H, Shatkin AJ, Reinberg D. 2004. Functional interactions of RNA-capping enzyme with factors that positively and negatively regulate promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:7572–7577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401493101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims RJIII, Rojas LA, Beck D, Bonasio R, Schuller R, Drury WJIII, Eick D, Reinberg D. 2011. The C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II is modified by site-specific methylation. Science 332:99–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1202663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman WC, Erikson RL. 2007. Finding Plk3. Cell Cycle 6:1314–1318. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.11.4275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu YX, Hirose Y, Zhou XZ, Lu KP, Manley JL. 2003. Pin1 modulates the structure and function of human RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 17:2765–2776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1135503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar