Both DNA Polymerases δ and ε Contact Active and Stalled Replication Forks Differently

REFERENCES

• Zeman MK, Cimprich KA. 2014. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 16:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazouzi A, Velimezi G, Loizou JI. 2014. DNA replication stress: causes, resolution and disease. Exp Cell Res 329:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio OM. 2013. Location, location, location: it's all in the timing for replication origins. Genes Dev 27:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.209999.112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell SD, Botchan MR. 2013. The minichromosome maintenance replicative helicase. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a012807. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pursell ZF, Isoz I, Lundstrom EB, Johansson E, Kunkel TA. 2007. Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 317:127–130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nick McElhinny SA, Gordenin DA, Stith CM, Burgers PM, Kunkel TA. 2008. Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol Cell 30:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman B. 2008. DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes. Mol Cell 30:259–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen AR, Lujan SA, Burkholder AB, Orebaugh CD, Williams JS, Clausen MF, Malc EP, Mieczkowski PA, Fargo DC, Smith DJ, Kunkel TA. 2015. Tracking replication enzymology in vivo by genome-wide mapping of ribonucleotide incorporation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigaku Y, Keszthelyi A, Muller CA, Miyabe I, Brooks T, Retkute R, Hubank M, Nieduszynski CA, Carr AM. 2015. A global profile of replicative polymerase usage. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijns MA, Kemp H, Ding J, de Proce SM, Jackson AP, Taylor MS. 2015. Lagging-strand replication shapes the mutational landscape of the genome. Nature 518:502–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh KD, Balachander S, Hesselberth JR, Storici F. 2015. Ribose-seq: global mapping of ribonucleotides embedded in genomic DNA. Nat Methods 12:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Gan H, Han J, Zhou ZX, Jia S, Chabes A, Farrugia G, Ordog T, Zhang Z. 2014. Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks stall. Mol Cell 56:551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Klassen R, Prakash L, Prakash S. 2015. A major role of DNA polymerase delta in replication of both the leading and lagging DNA strands. Mol Cell 59:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K. 2007. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129:823–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer M, Kircher M, Gansauge MT, Li H, Racimo F, Mallick S, Schraiber JG, Jay F, Prufer K, de Filippo C, Sudmant PH, Alkan C, Fu Q, Do R, Rohland N, Tandon A, Siebauer M, Green RE, Bryc K, Briggs AW, Stenzel U, Dabney J, Shendure J, Kitzman J, Hammer MF, Shunkov MV, Derevianko AP, Patterson N, Andres AM, Eichler EE, Slatkin M, Reich D, Kelso J, Paabo S. 2012. A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338:222–226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansauge MT, Meyer M. 2013. Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA. Nat Protoc 8:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane A, Robbiani DF, Resch W, Bothmer A, Nakahashi H, Oliveira T, Rommel PC, Brown EJ, Nussenzweig A, Nussenzweig MC, Casellas R. 2013. RPA accumulation during class switch recombination represents 5′-3′ DNA-end resection during the S-G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Cell Rep 3:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.12.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Donnell M, Langston L, Stillman B. 2013. Principles and concepts of DNA replication in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a010108. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a010108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marechal A, Zou L. 2013. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a012716. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Elledge SJ. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu YV, Yardimci H, Long DT, Ho TV, Guainazzi A, Bermudez VP, Hurwitz J, van Oijen A, Scharer OD, Walter JC. 2011. Selective bypass of a lagging strand roadblock by the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase. Cell 146:931–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langston LD, Zhang D, Yurieva O, Georgescu RE, Finkelstein J, Yao NY, Indiani C, O'Donnell ME. 2014. CMG helicase and DNA polymerase epsilon form a functional 15-subunit holoenzyme for eukaryotic leading-strand DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:15390–15395. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418334111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta S, van Deursen F, de Piccoli G, Labib K. 2013. Dpb2 integrates the leading-strand DNA polymerase into the eukaryotic replisome. Curr Biol 23:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, van Deursen F, Edmondson RD, Labib K. 2006. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 8:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambus A, van Deursen F, Polychronopoulos D, Foltman M, Jones RC, Edmondson RD, Calzada A, Labib K. 2009. A key role for Ctf4 in coupling the MCM2-7 helicase to DNA polymerase alpha within the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J 28:2992–3004. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb JA, Bjergbaek L, Shimada K, Frei C, Gasser SM. 2003. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J 22:4325–4336. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Piccoli G, Katou Y, Itoh T, Nakato R, Shirahige K, Labib K. 2012. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol Cell 45:696–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran HT, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. 1999. The 3′–>5′ exonucleases of DNA polymerases delta and epsilon and the 5′–>3′ exonuclease Exo1 have major roles in postreplication mutation avoidance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19:2000–2007. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.3.2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou ZX, Zhang MJ, Peng X, Takayama Y, Xu XY, Huang LZ, Du LL. 2013. Mapping genomic hotspots of DNA damage by a single-strand-DNA-compatible and strand-specific ChIP-seq method. Genome Res 23:705–715. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.146357.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkel K, Spadola A, Yuan E, Kosek J, Jiang L, Hod E, Li K, Murty VV, Schupf N, Vilain E, Morris M, Haghighi F, Tycko B. 2008. Genomic surveys by methylation-sensitive SNP analysis identify sequence-dependent allele-specific DNA methylation. Nat Genet 40:904–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waga S, Stillman B. 1998. The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 67:721–751. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell SP, Dutta A. 2002. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 71:333–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini F, Pellicioli A, Paciotti V, Lucchini G, Plevani P, Stern DF, Foiani M. 1997. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J 16:639–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.3.639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsurimoto T, Stillman B. 1991. Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. II. Switching of DNA polymerase alpha and delta during initiation of leading and lagging strand synthesis. J Biol Chem 266:1961–1968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsurimoto T, Stillman B. 1991. Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. I. DNA structure-specific recognition of a primer-template junction by eukaryotic DNA polymerases and their accessory proteins. J Biol Chem 266:1950–1960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waga S, Stillman B. 1994. Anatomy of a DNA replication fork revealed by reconstitution of SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 369:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/369207a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu RE, Langston L, Yao NY, Yurieva O, Zhang D, Finkelstein J, Agarwal T, O'Donnell ME. 2014. Mechanism of asymmetric polymerase assembly at the eukaryotic replication fork. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:664–670. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JS, Clausen AR, Lujan SA, Marjavaara L, Clark AB, Burgers PM, Chabes A, Kunkel TA. 2015. Evidence that processing of ribonucleotides in DNA by topoisomerase 1 is leading-strand specific. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman B. 2015. Reconsidering DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes. Mol Cell 59:139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros J, Kumar C, Lynch G, Yadav T, Whitehouse I, Remus D. 2015. Post-licensing specification of eukaryotic replication origins by facilitated Mcm2-7 sliding along DNA. Mol Cell 60:797–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santocanale C, Diffley JF. 1998. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395:615–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/27001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirahige K, Hori Y, Shiraishi K, Yamashita M, Takahashi K, Obuse C, Tsurimoto T, Yoshikawa H. 1998. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395:618–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/27007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Denisenko O, Bomsztyk K. 2006. Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat Protoc 1:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, Liu XS. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9:R137. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar